Did colonization ruin India's image?

[INDIC]

Asia minor was even created earlier. And India is a place like Asian minor. Or Levant or Persia or Arabia. Now, there were real Persia empire, but Persia is a name of a people and place.

The name Iran is more than a country, as Pushtans and Azabajanis are also Iranian people. Also, Uzbek and Kazaks are Turks. This does not mean that Afghanistan or Azabajan are part of Iran. And Uzbeks should be park of Turkey.

Indian the country today today is even more diverse than Turks or Iranians (the people, not the country). Its compose of Indo-Aryans in the north and Dravidians in the south. Both people have a varied degree of Australoid in them. Plus, there are some original Australoid in the mix. No wonder Britain was needed to create a country called India.

I don't find your historical comparison of any worth, its pure garbage. Now, even genetic studies proof North Indian and South Indians both share a common ancestry from two dominant races. What Pashtuns and Azeris think not my problem.

Central Asia is no more Iranic or Turks arrived in Asia minor in 11th century but we are descendants of same people, our languages evolved from the languages of our ancestors.