What's new

Democracy in China? It's in the eye of the beholder.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did I said about perfect world? what you work for? being worse or being better? the goal you set is to make you surpass your current one or opposite? what's your or human's ultimate goal? why you need leader? the purpose?

If you don't need book, why you need characters and language? sorry, I can't understand, animal have similar life style you described, why human need evolve from animal?

The answer to the Purpose of life cannot be found in politics or democracy or even economics.

You are asking the right question in a wrong place.

Purpose of life is different for everybody. There is no common universal purpose that drives people.

"Survival" is not the purpose of life. Purpose comes after survival.

Personal Growth is not one dimensional to be viewed from the POV of economics. And it certainly cannot be viewed from the POV of governance and administration.

But one thing it definitely requires is freedom. A wide range of freedom, not only the freedom to do the right thing.

Animals desire survival (i think) , Humans desire growth and expansion. But the growth and expansion cannot be viewed from the prism of economics.
 
.
Rich countries attract people going there , it doesn't matter what political system those countries have. Simple as that. If so called democracy is so dear in Indians' mind, you won't see so many Indians working in the middle east and everywhere in the world
 
.
That's the spirit, you can stop here. We are happy about the way we live and you about yours. Chinese don't talk about Indian political system much and Indians seem to be very keen of this topic

It is an interesting topic, even though I do not have any personal stake in it.

Like I said earlier, personal growth is not one dimensional.
 
.
It is an interesting topic, even though I do not have any personal stake in it.
Of course, the OP is Chinese people's take on democracy, not an Indian's. We took different paths and get the different results.
 
.
Rich countries attract people going there , it doesn't matter what political system those countries have. Simple as that. If so called democracy is so dear in Indians' mind, you won't see so many Indians working in the middle east and everywhere in the world

Yet the vast majority of Indians who work in the M.E have NO desire to settle in the M.E.

Even the muslims who work their.

Many of them aspire to migrate to the West if given a chance, not many would choose china even if that was possible.

Most work their to send money back home so that they can come back and lead a good life in India.
 
.
The answer to the Purpose of life cannot be found in politics or democracy or even economics.

You are asking the right question in a wrong place.

Purpose of life is different for everybody. There is no common universal purpose that drives people.

"Survival" is not the purpose of life. Purpose comes after survival.

Personal Growth is not one dimensional to be viewed from the POV of economics. And it certainly cannot be viewed from the POV of governance and administration.

But one thing it definitely requires is freedom. A wide range of freedom, not only the freedom to do the right thing.

Animals desire survival (i think) , Humans desire growth and expansion. But the growth and expansion cannot be viewed from the prism of economics.
Hehe, infact, no need to expand to far, back your original comment.

Very simple, is it privilege that makeing mistake in democratic society? China don't make mistake?
 
.
Many of them aspire to migrate to the West if given a chance, not many would choose china even if that was possible.
.

That's what I am saying, not many Chinese want to live in India either. You don't have to preach democracy to us, we can see how it works in India. you can keep it and we keep ours.
 
.
Hehe, infact, no need to expand to far, back your original comment.

Very simple, is it privilege that makeing mistake in democratic society? China don't make mistake?

I have already answered that question TWICE now.

The difference is CHOICE to make mistake and making mistake by ACCIDENT.

The difference is individual choice to make a mistake and the govt. making a mistake.

In the first case, the individual learns and the govt. learns through the individual, the the second case the govt. learns while the individual remains ignorant.

That's what I am saying, not many Chinese want to live in India either. You don't have to preach democracy to us, we can see how it works in India. you can keep it and we keep ours.

That is Factually wrong as we have a Large number of Tibetan Refugees in India, so clearly they desire to live in India rather than China.

NO one is preaching democracy to china, I couldn't care less.
 
.
I have already answered that question TWICE now.

The difference is CHOICE to make mistake and making mistake by ACCIDENT.

The difference is individual choice to make a mistake and the govt. making a mistake.

In the first case, the individual learns and the govt. learns through the individual, the the second case the govt. learns while the individual remains ignorant.
So, who is choosing to make mistake and who by accident? China choose to or by accident?

That is Factually wrong as we have a Large number of Tibetan Refugees in India, so clearly they desire to live in India rather than China.

NO one is preaching democracy to china, I couldn't care less.
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
 
.
I would say it's not about which system is right and which is wrong, it's more about their suitability to different countries based on their cultural and historical backgrounds, I don't understand why Indian posters vehmently try to argue that democracy is better for China while most Chinese don't give it a damn
 
.
So, who is choosing to make mistake and who by accident? China choose to or by accident?

Obvious its by accident by china since the govt. would be foolish or malefic to make a mistake on purpose.

Individuals have the space to make mistakes, govt.'s don't.
 
.
That is Factually wrong as we have a Large number of Tibetan Refugees in India, so clearly they desire to live in India rather than China.

NO one is preaching democracy to china, I couldn't care less.

They were there for religious reasons and they don't really represent the main stream China, right?
 
.
I would say it's not about which system is right and which is wrong, it's more about their suitability to different countries based on their cultural and historical backgrounds, I don't understand why Indian posters vehmently try to argue that democracy is better for China while most Chinese don't give it a damn

To the best of my knowledge, most Indian poster vehemently argue that democracy is better for everybody. China in only incidental to that topic. Hardly any Indians care about democracy in china.
 
.
If you claim that Chinese people want to live in India just because some Tibetans there following Dalai Lama, that will be really absurd.
 
.
So, who is choosing to make mistake and who by accident? China choose to or by accident?
:omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

You would feel better if I call them Chinese refugees ? Wouldn't make the slightest difference to me.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom