Delusional Indians and Abhinandans Humiliation.

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

B.S Dhanoa spitting more B/S.

Only in India such clowns become chief!!! He does not look professional at all.

 

[Pakistan First]

This statement is clarified and explained by DG ISPR himself that it was a fog of war like misquote when actually two different troops been reporting of the same Abhinandan hence, the miscount. DG ISPR clearly recalled this statement and even shared a tweet as well from official account. I am also sure that everyone does know the fact of recalling officially but ....

Regards,

That is correct.

There was just one pilot and that was Abhinandan. We do not have any other pilot in our custody.

Promise.

 

[PradoTLC]

All i have to say to ENdians... first convince this old hag to believe you shot down a F-16 then come and talk to us...

lol...

 

[ziaulislam]

pakistan on 27th of Feb.

3. DG ISPR mentioned that “One Indian pilot was arrested by troops on ground while two in the area

2. “Two pilots were arrested by troops on ground, one of them has been shifted to CMH while the other is in our Custody – and we will take full care of them.”

1. One in custody, he he.

So abhi isnt an indian..thats what your sources said first
And was mi17 not shot down by india..that we heard for 3 months
But perfectable reasonable assumption that two pilots were captured as 2 units reported it when you know you shot down 2 jets is some how a lie that too corrected before even india acknowledged that abhi was an indian..infact most said he wasnt because of his mustache but youtube...i belive they would denied him being a indian if his youtube/media existence was absent ...
Lets dont even get started about satellite imaging..thats a shame..even by shameless standarads

 

[Cookie Monster]

Whats really concerning from india side is how french dopped the indians..(per this article)

They provide inferior quality mirage uograde ..with just Mica when the promise was meteor and even that was facing glitches ..mirages returned back after they were locked but they couldnt lock the thunders back.

Technical details are not available in the public domain as to what went on exactly...but I personally think that the reason why the IAF M2K may have been unable to get a lock on PAF jets might be bcuz of jamming from PAF assets. The French are known to make some top of the line stuff when it comes to jets and avionics...
...these things go through thorough testing before becoming operational. So it seems almost unbelievable to think that they were unable to lock on due to a "glitch".

 

[Dark1]

Dgispr has claimed that 2 pilots were involved , one died and one was released.

 

[Jackdaws]

Lol. Pak chaps spoke to him so much and recorded much of the conversation. Where is the bit where he categorically states he did not shoot down an F16? Surely he must have told his captors that. Or they must have told him / asked him and he must have replied. Where is that footage?

 

[SIPRA]

All i have to say to ENdians... first convince this old hag to believe you shot down a F-16 then come and talk to us...

I don't think that now Indians would ever call her, on any public forum, to discuss Feb 26/27.

 

[taha137]

Statement under Pakistani authorites can be considered in admissible as he was under duress, but would you like to show a statement by abhinandan in India(his home country), in front of his people, where he categorically states that he shotdown F-16.

Lol. Pak chaps spoke to him so much and recorded much of the conversation. Where is the bit where he categorically states he did not shoot down an F16? Surely he must have told his captors that. Or they must have told him / asked him and he must have replied. Where is that footage?

 

[Shabi1]

Dgispr has claimed that 2 pilots were involved , one died and one was released.

And InAF claimed they killed 300 people but turned out 1 crow and few trees.

 

[PradoTLC]

I don't think that now Indians would ever call her, on any public forum, to discuss Feb 26/27.

with indians you never know......

 

[Dark1]

And InAF claimed they killed 300 people but turned out 1 crow and few trees.

Is this still the official pakistani position of one dead Indian pilot ?

 

[Jackdaws]

Statement under Pakistani authorites can be considered in admissible as he was under duress, but would you like to show a statement by abhinandan in India(his home country), in front of his people, where he categorically states that he shotdown F-16.

So the statement he made about Pak treating him well was under duress?

In India, active officers don't address press conferences except some chiefs. And he can say anything once he is back home and you will happily call it a lie even if he says he shot down an F16. But Pak released so much footage of Abhinandan enjoying tea, claiming the Indian media is bombastic (both of which I am sure is true) - surely they must have footage of him saying he missed his target.

As an aside, I don't think 300 people died in Balakot. So it's not as if I buy all my Government tells me hook, line and sinker.

When the American pilot was shot down and captured by the Soviets in 1960 - the Soviets let the Americans make all sorts of claims including that it was a weather aircraft and the pilot was dead. The Soviets then embarrassed the Americans by showing the pilot alive and proving he was on recce mission and not in some weather plane.

Here were just have 2 contradictory narratives. But it doesn't surprise me - when I first met Pak students in the US - they were shocked that in India it is taught that India won 65 as much I was shocked that Pak are taught that they won in 65. If the narrative of an entire war is so different - what can one expect from one dog fight incident?

 

[krash]

https://www.facebook.com/

B.S Dhanoa spitting more B/S.

So Dhanoa says that the PAF was not in the loop or they would have placed "terminal weapons" around Balakot and intercepted Indian standoff weapons......very smart analysis by him with that horrific smirk to match. Or....maybe....you know....the IAF tried to target a school? Hence the absence of any "terminal weapons" around Balakot, you blithering simpleton?

The IAF though, if we go by his exact argument, was indeed completely clueless and "out of the loop". The PAF came and dropped bombs on six highly sensitive Indian military locations and there were no Indian "terminal weapons" stationed there to intercept those Pakistani standoff weapons, as he proposed for the PAF at Balakot. One of those locations was a brigade headquarters with his Army Chief wetting his pants inside.

"Agar mein wahan hota".....what an absolute clown. I still don't get how his countrymen can actually take anything that he says seriously.

 

[Myth_buster_1]

So the statement he made about Pak treating him well was under duress?

seriously? it was pakistan army that rescued him in the first place! and then they gave him freewill to answer question whichever way he wanted to because in other parts of the world pilots get tortured to death. like when they asked him "what was your mission" to which he replied "im sorry sir im not suppose to tell you that" is not under duress!

In India, active officers don't address press conferences except some chiefs. And he can say anything once he is back home and you will happily call it a lie even if he says he shot down an F16. But Pak released so much footage of Abhinandan enjoying tea, claiming the Indian media is bombastic (both of which I am sure is true) - surely they must have footage of him saying he missed his target.

Here is a video of IAF female officer revealing her role on 27th February.
If she can come up to media and talk then why cant abhi? The thing is, PAF still has mig-21 blackbox so if abi lies he can be exposed even further more.