Tps43
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2016
- Messages
- 4,960
- Reaction score
- 16
- Country
- Location
Don’t take them seriously they are in denial and next stage is depression
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t take them seriously they are in denial and next stage is depression
Oh come on. You have a "proof" after all. Use it and expose us.
Come on. Let's try again.
Use your "proof" to show that it was fired by the same offensive formation that you claimed to engage and shot down. Try it
Lol even I can come up with such pieces and say that they are indian BVR missile s.. they aren’t hard to make..India never claimed F-16 fell on its side of LoC.
Actually it went like this -
Pakistan: No F-16 was used, JF-17s were in fray
India: (shows AMRAAM)
Pakistan: ........
TV channel @IndiaToday was recycling #Indian govt claim of shooting down a PAF F-16 and was displaying 'evidence' released by Indian military commanders.
Then something unexpected happened: the expert in the studio said the engine design shown is not what Pakistan uses. https://t.co/REVem2VuDg
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.
Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used?
If they don’t than will you’ll Indian airforce accept and apologies for making false claims ?You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.
Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used?
So now you want ur BF to come up and take the revenge for you. Jo phanti pari thai tum logon ko, tum us kai badlay Amreeca sa pabandian lagwana chahtay ho .You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.
Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used?
You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.
Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used?
I think this should be enough:
I already congratulated 9 Sqn in the morning.
This piece should remind them that we have 600+ of these for them
It is a BVR kill from JF17 supported by SAAB and Blinder in the Air and YLC and MPDR on the ground.
yeah.. that story is now catching fire at the sudden disappearance of the second pilot who was in Hospital and some sites going as far as saying that he was a PAF pilot .. can't be that DG ISPR said something, PM said something and suddenly all of that is wrong and there is only 1 guy...
Since you guys seem so sure on this....pease share the source of this info to back your claims and refute us.....You'll have the proof when sanctions come down on Pakistan for using F-16s and AMRAAMs paid for by US against the terms specified by WOT FMS rules.
Hint: Why do you think PAF was trying so hard to vehemently deny that any F-16 was used?