What's new

Debunking Indian claims of F-16 firing AIM-120C AMRAAM

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1920385/1/



Read tje full article till last line.... Than stick it some where...


Gives you full track of that mijjile

A lot of countries were sold missiles made under 0070 contract, the one sold to Taiwan was a sub-contract. There were other sub-contracts -

amraam.png


Now what you want to say... :lol:
 
.
india want badly an f-166666666666666666666666666666666666 [emoji38][emoji38][emoji38] i am enjoying thier pain how badly they want it :rofl:
By claiming they shot down a f-16 with a fucking mig-21 they are going to piss off the Americans for no reason. Giving a bad name to their house hold fighter jet
 
.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1920385/1-fact-checking-missile-shown-indian-generals-sold-taiwan/

The report revealed that contract number FA867505C0070 corresponded to a batch of AIM-120C-5 AMRAAM missiles supplied to Taiwan in a Foreign Military Sale worth $2.38 million.

How the wreckage of a missile sold to Taiwan ended up in the hands of an Indian military air vice marshal is something only New Delhi can explain.

IAF Chief Marshal just confirmed F16 down personally - by Mig 21 Bison! Joint chiefs of staff briefing on currently. Will post after it gets over.
Personally lol. Missile was sold to Taiwan. You would like to think USA would turn a blind eye to Taiwan selling AIM 120s on the black market; especially to Pakistan :D. Give me some of that stuff you're snorting!
 
.
Aren't they trying to proof that PAF destroyed their jet after crossing the line, which is a bad thing for their own chest thumping ?
 
. .
Why India took more then 32 hrs to find a piece of Amaram Missile and then show it on tv. Its seems that India shot a Amraam missile in air not an F-16. If they really shot a F-16 then where are other parts of the wreckage (please don't tell me that only the missile fell in IOK rest is fell on our side)

What was told by ISPR spokesman was that no F-16 took part in the bombing raid, mirages dropped bombs meanwhile JF-17 provided the escort. F-16 came in later when the Indian Mig's crossed LOC.
 
.
Hoping for another kill. however, an exploded AIM-120 does not exactly means a kill, isn't their a self-termination mechanism if the target is missed?

Also, it seems like the missile was sold to Taiwan, how on earth is it with PAF? (They might have fabricated the evidence)

Exactly, debunked. They have a lot to prove to support their claims.
 
. . . .
We have Aim-120c5s in use. It is possible they were used on the LoC in covering offensive force.
We have EVERY right to use them.

However, that missile is the worst proof possible of something shot down on our side and is actually proof that something was blown out of the sky on their side.
 
. .
If AMRAAM was indeed fired by an F-16 it would mean that the aircraft was far away from LoC. At least 50-60Km away. It will not be visible to ground forces where the engagement took place. For close combat, the pilot would use the Sidewinder. India should go back and look for Sidewinder debris. I am sure Israel or Taiwan might have one.
 
.
We have Aim-120c5s in use. It is possible they were used on the LoC in covering offensive force.
We have EVERY right to use them.

However, that missile is the worst proof possible of something shot down on our side and is actually proof that something was blown out of the sky on their side.

Sir can you inform us about the serial and contract numbers on the missile? Is it correct to conclude this particular piece was not fired by PAF and obtained by IAF through other means?
 
.
Sir can you inform us about the serial and contract numbers on the missile? Is it correct to conclude this particular piece was not fired by PAF and obtained by IAF through other means?
I cannot. There is too much loghorrea from India on the missile and its origins to effectively find a reasonable conclusion online.

All I can state is that we had and have every right to use the F-16 and its associated weapons as we wished but it was not used in the offensive operation accross the LoC.
However, if a missile is fired at IAF aircraft on our side of the LoC by a patrolling PAF F-16, and the missile chases it across the border and blows it up- it is logical that wreckage from that missile would fall into Indian controlled territory.

What is illogical is Indians claiming the piece of a Aim-120 as proof an entire jet was shot down.
But.. Indians.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom