What's new

Crisp J-20 pictures

看来离首飞时间应该很近了 :victory::victory:

Translation::::

یہ پہلی پرواز وقت سے لگتا ہے بہت قریب ہونا چاہئے

It seems that the first flight time should be very near!

What do you think, we can't understand Chinese?
nunu.gif


J/k
 
Last edited:
.
你要不要给他们说搭了观礼台和摄像机位的事情啊~~~~~

really?where did you get the news?:what:
 
.
now we have to move china for learn chines or some one stop this secret war?
 
. . . . . . .
Fighter but with multi-role capabilities. Air superiority is probably the emphasis though.

No. It's a striker. It has a heavy payload and fuel, and it sacrifices some of its maneuverability to do this. It's a fighter, yes, but with emphasis on strike.

The stealth fighter by SAC is an air superiority fighter. It's called J-12 or J-14.
 
.
No. It's a striker. It has a heavy payload and fuel, and it sacrifices some of its maneuverability to do this. It's a fighter, yes, but with emphasis on strike.

The stealth fighter by SAC is an air superiority fighter. It's called J-12 or J-14.

I've been hearing very different things from huzhigeng, the man who leaked the plane in 2009.
 
.
I've been hearing very different things from huzhigeng, the man who leaked the plane in 2009.

Most people agree on this theory:

The J-20 is a fighter-bomber

SAC will soon test fly the J-14, which is an air superiority stealth fighter
SAC will also soon test the J-16, a 4.5++/quasi-5th-gen fighter based on J-11B, which will supplement the more expensive J-13 and J-14.

So, in conclusion:
- J-20: multirole fighter (emphasis on strike)
- J-14: multirole fighter (emphasis on air superiority)
- J-16: multirole fighter (supplement the J-13 and J-14)
 
. . .

Most people agree on this theory:

The J-20 is a fighter-bomber

SAC will soon test fly the J-14, which is an air superiority stealth fighter
SAC will also soon test the J-16, a 4.5++/quasi-5th-gen fighter based on J-11B, which will supplement the more expensive J-13 and J-14.

So, in conclusion:
- J-20: multirole fighter (emphasis on strike)
- J-14: multirole fighter (emphasis on air superiority)
- J-16: multirole fighter (supplement the J-13 and J-14)



When the F-22 was designed, it had to be a good dogfighter with a gun no less because American didnt want to take the chance that visual range engagements are a thing of the past. Since then the lesson learned is that indeed BVR does seem to be as its hyped up to be. Furthermore F-22 pilots complain that they would be even more dominant with greater internal missile loads.
It then seems quite logical to design the J20 as a bigger missile ship than the F-22. Its internal bays are probably designed with larger next generation ramjet missles like the the PL-21 in mind, rather than limited to petite missiles like the AMRAAM.

J20 is a specialized air supremacy fighter like the F-22. It also makes perfect sense to design the J20 as a air supremacy fighter since China will have a JSF or B-2 to carry out the bomb role.
J16 is not a specialized air supremacy fighter like the J20. It is most likely a true multirole fighter. Capable of carrying larger and more numerous air-to-air missiles, as well as having a F-35 role. Having an all in one capability makes sense for two reasons. One being a common platform would be cheaper. Had China gone for a J20 like specialist they may not be able to afford to build a significant number. Second, as a Flanker operator, PLAAF is already used to having a large fighter with multi-mission capability. J16 is designed to replace the multirole Flankers, just as the J20 is designed to replace the pure air supremacy J10.
===========================================
J16: a strike fighter (Shenyang Aircraft Corporation)
J20: a air supremacy fighter (Chengdu Aircraft Corporation)
J14: not exist (a carrier-based fighter//J15 has won the battle with the J14) it is double engine J10
H8: a Stealth Bomber(Xi'an Aircraft Industrial Corporation)

The pictures of the H8:
1101012149de499e7528e06761.jpg

1101041153a37f52ad2fdef30f.jpg

1101041154712b9b862417c2b7.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom