What's new

China Hong Kong SAR: News and Images

It already happened. The ball is in CPC's hand. What are they going to do about this situation? Give in or go hard? I think they will give in because HK is a money making machine for them and they don't want to disturb the golden goose.

HK is still too small to tremble the entire PRC, that's why right now CPC still won't bother to do anything, although already got annoyed.

Xi Jinping's primary task is to ensure China's economy can still develop smoothly without getting disrupted.

If HK doesn't get out of control, then it is unlikely that CPC will do anything right now.

Now it is up to the pro-China HKers to do something right now, they should start to resist against the imperialistic Trojan and stop these people to further alienate HK from the Mainland China.

If keep going down into the path, it is the ordinary HK folks who are going to suffer at the end.

So they should start to fight for their own behalf.
 
.
on Tuesday morning in Hong Kong’s Victoria Park

Beijing can start with changing these fracking British imperialist names.

I guess Beijing is doing wrong by cozying up to the apparent traitors. How hard could that be to mobilize 1 million strong pro-China activists?

HK rally will not alter govt stance: official

SAR chief encourages territory to cherish economic success
a882f183-58a5-450f-b183-a8ad6608bce1.jpeg

Policemen keep vigil in front of a luxury shop in the central district as demonstrators march during a "pro-democracy" rally in Hong Kong on Tuesday. Photo: AFP

Hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong residents took to the streets on Tuesday in an annual "pro-democracy" rally while authorities celebrated the 17th anniversary of the region's return to China.

Local business people said that the rally has evolved into a playground for radical groups, and many residents expressed their resentment of extreme activities such as the Occupy Central movement.

The aim of the march, which follows a 10-day unofficial "referendum" on how Hong Kong's next chief executive should be elected, is said to be "fighting for true universal suffrage," said one of its main organizers, Yeung Ching-yin of the Civil Human Rights Front.

The size of the protest or number of votes cast will not change the central government's stance, which remains firmly on the side of universal suffrage in Hong Kong, said Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in Hong Kong, on Tuesday at a ceremony marking the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR).

Most of the business groups at the celebration opposed the pan-democrats' Occupy Central proposal and civil referendum, and expressed their view that the rally, begun in 1997 as a platform for ordinary Hong Kong people to participate in politics and voice their demands, has become a playground for some radical groups.

"Hong Kong needs stability first before it achieves democracy and prosperity. Inciting protests will only contribute to the unstable political situation in Hong Kong," said a man surnamed Lam, a member of the Hong Kong Hainan Commercial Association.

Protesters began gathering at Victoria Park around 2 pm, setting off two hours later on a route that took them through some of Hong Kong's densest commercial districts.

The Global Times noted that many of the protesters adopted a casual attitude, viewing the march as a part of their normal political participation.

"I've come to this protest every year since 2003," a 65 year-old man surnamed Mok told the Global Times. "It is a traditional way for us Hong Kong people to express our hope for democracy, as well as a reflection of our democracy."

Another man surnamed Chan, who joined the march with his wife and son, told the Global Times that he also voted in the civil referendum, but he did not agree with the Occupy movement.

"They should at least wait for the government's proposal and not push the authorities," said Chan.

Dissatisfied employees, animal rights activists and many other groups also used the march as an opportunity to advance their causes.

The referendum, which ended on Sunday, saw Hong Kong residents cast nearly 790,000 votes for three different proposals, all of which called for public nomination to play a role in electing Hong Kong's next leader in 2017.

Yeung estimated that over half million people took part in the protest, while police said that about 92,000 had set out from central Hong Kong's Victoria Park by 7:30 pm.

Hong Kong Chief Executive CY Leung said Tuesday that Hong Kong should cherish its hard-won economic success, adding that Hong Kong SAR government will strive to advance constitutional reform.

Two student organizations participating in the march came to a halt after arriving in Hong Kong's central commercial district and began a sit-in which they described as a rehearsal for Occupy Central.

Chow Yong-kang, spokesperson of the Hong Kong Federation of Students, said he hoped more citizens will join the student movement.

By 10 pm around 2,000 people, mostly students, had joined the sit-in, which was not approved by police. Chow said that the demonstrators would leave on Wednesday morning, while police said they would begin clearing the area at about 4 am.

Meanwhile, members of Scholarism, another student organization, surrounded the office building of current Hong Kong chief executive CY Leung. Wong Chi-fung, the organization's central figure, said they were there to persuade Leung to accept public nomination of the region's chief executive.

However, Occupy Central with Peace and Love, the original organizer of the Occupy Central movement and the driving force behind the electoral referendum, believe that now is not the time to resort to occupation tactics.

Tam Yiu-chung, a Hong Kong Legislative Council (LegCo) member, told the Global Times previously that pan-democratic parties see the annual protest as a good opportunity to promote themselves.

Groups such as Civic Party, People Power, Democratic Party and Civil Human Rights Front have deployed their members to collect funds along the marching route. Flags promoting pro-democracy LegCo members could also be seen along the route.

Most of the protesters Global Times interviewed agreed that some slogans, like "Make CY Leung resign," "Re-form a new government" and "A totally independent Hong Kong" were inciting and radical.

The march proceeded peacefully except for several attempts by some protesters to break the fences cordoning off several lanes, which police halted immediately.
 
.
Beijing can start with changing these fracking British imperialist names.

I guess Beijing is doing wrong by cozying up to the apparent traitors. How hard could that be to mobilize 1 million strong pro-China activists?

HK rally will not alter govt stance: official

SAR chief encourages territory to cherish economic success
a882f183-58a5-450f-b183-a8ad6608bce1.jpeg

Policemen keep vigil in front of a luxury shop in the central district as demonstrators march during a "pro-democracy" rally in Hong Kong on Tuesday. Photo: AFP

Hundreds of thousands of Hong Kong residents took to the streets on Tuesday in an annual "pro-democracy" rally while authorities celebrated the 17th anniversary of the region's return to China.

Local business people said that the rally has evolved into a playground for radical groups, and many residents expressed their resentment of extreme activities such as the Occupy Central movement.

The aim of the march, which follows a 10-day unofficial "referendum" on how Hong Kong's next chief executive should be elected, is said to be "fighting for true universal suffrage," said one of its main organizers, Yeung Ching-yin of the Civil Human Rights Front.

The size of the protest or number of votes cast will not change the central government's stance, which remains firmly on the side of universal suffrage in Hong Kong, said Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in Hong Kong, on Tuesday at a ceremony marking the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR).

Most of the business groups at the celebration opposed the pan-democrats' Occupy Central proposal and civil referendum, and expressed their view that the rally, begun in 1997 as a platform for ordinary Hong Kong people to participate in politics and voice their demands, has become a playground for some radical groups.

"Hong Kong needs stability first before it achieves democracy and prosperity. Inciting protests will only contribute to the unstable political situation in Hong Kong," said a man surnamed Lam, a member of the Hong Kong Hainan Commercial Association.

Protesters began gathering at Victoria Park around 2 pm, setting off two hours later on a route that took them through some of Hong Kong's densest commercial districts.

The Global Times noted that many of the protesters adopted a casual attitude, viewing the march as a part of their normal political participation.

"I've come to this protest every year since 2003," a 65 year-old man surnamed Mok told the Global Times. "It is a traditional way for us Hong Kong people to express our hope for democracy, as well as a reflection of our democracy."

Another man surnamed Chan, who joined the march with his wife and son, told the Global Times that he also voted in the civil referendum, but he did not agree with the Occupy movement.

"They should at least wait for the government's proposal and not push the authorities," said Chan.

Dissatisfied employees, animal rights activists and many other groups also used the march as an opportunity to advance their causes.

The referendum, which ended on Sunday, saw Hong Kong residents cast nearly 790,000 votes for three different proposals, all of which called for public nomination to play a role in electing Hong Kong's next leader in 2017.

Yeung estimated that over half million people took part in the protest, while police said that about 92,000 had set out from central Hong Kong's Victoria Park by 7:30 pm.

Hong Kong Chief Executive CY Leung said Tuesday that Hong Kong should cherish its hard-won economic success, adding that Hong Kong SAR government will strive to advance constitutional reform.

Two student organizations participating in the march came to a halt after arriving in Hong Kong's central commercial district and began a sit-in which they described as a rehearsal for Occupy Central.

Chow Yong-kang, spokesperson of the Hong Kong Federation of Students, said he hoped more citizens will join the student movement.

By 10 pm around 2,000 people, mostly students, had joined the sit-in, which was not approved by police. Chow said that the demonstrators would leave on Wednesday morning, while police said they would begin clearing the area at about 4 am.

Meanwhile, members of Scholarism, another student organization, surrounded the office building of current Hong Kong chief executive CY Leung. Wong Chi-fung, the organization's central figure, said they were there to persuade Leung to accept public nomination of the region's chief executive.

However, Occupy Central with Peace and Love, the original organizer of the Occupy Central movement and the driving force behind the electoral referendum, believe that now is not the time to resort to occupation tactics.

Tam Yiu-chung, a Hong Kong Legislative Council (LegCo) member, told the Global Times previously that pan-democratic parties see the annual protest as a good opportunity to promote themselves.

Groups such as Civic Party, People Power, Democratic Party and Civil Human Rights Front have deployed their members to collect funds along the marching route. Flags promoting pro-democracy LegCo members could also be seen along the route.

Most of the protesters Global Times interviewed agreed that some slogans, like "Make CY Leung resign," "Re-form a new government" and "A totally independent Hong Kong" were inciting and radical.

The march proceeded peacefully except for several attempts by some protesters to break the fences cordoning off several lanes, which police halted immediately.

CPC always dislikes the pro-Brit HK faction just like they dislike KMT and DPP.

However, right now it is too early to do something big.
 
.
CPC always dislikes the pro-Brit HK faction just like they dislike KMT and DPP.

However, right now it is too early to do something big.

I agree. If the situation requires, I am sure Beijing will take care of it. It is one country, two systems, and the one country is China, including HK.

By the way, a learned comment at Global Times by the member senkohoe. I quote:

"It is economic, stupid!...is the reality first and foremost for the majority of Hong Kong people. Without a full stomach no soldier could march. Without bringing in basic food on the dinner table or bread and butter to survive...democracy, universal suffrage, religion or God lose its meaning..?! Hong Kong is just like any city like Shenzhen, Shanghai; not a state or country. It belongs to China, a return territory in imperial British colonialism period of Opium war. Hong Kong is very lucky to reach a remarkable economic metropolitan shopping mecca with worldwide visitors, shopper with sharp, skillful businesses, operators, a free port with political stability provided by China. It is wise to enjoy your freedom, wealth and livelihood far better to many in China unable to reach or achieved...but don't ask for something even the British cannot give?! What democracy when minority of 700,000 to 800,000 of questionable online voting versus the majority of 7 to 8 millions city population?! It is laughable demand from China of 1.3 billions people. Beware of foreign infiltration with intent to disrupt, dis-harmonize; and be proud of Edward Snowden chose Hong Kong as first landing. Do not lose your reality, focus for a few people's selfish interest and gains to which I could see and smell fishy far away."
 
. .
We will export them to Vietnam. You know how to kill Chinese looking people. Mob style.
I think we will take them as we gave shelter and foods for the fleeing Chinese after the collapse of the Ming.
 
.
I think we will take them as we gave shelter and foods for the fleeing Chinese after the collapse of the Ming.

No. You do not preserve that high-moral. You will rob them first, and then beat to death. You have done that already. No reason not to believe that you will not do it again.
 
.
I think we will take them as we gave shelter and foods for the fleeing Chinese after the collapse of the Ming.

You Annan stabbed back Ming, so disgusting. Other countries pay tribute to Ming once a year, you pay tribute 3 times a year, greedy Annan.
 
. .
No. You do not preserve that high-moral. You will rob them first, and then beat to death. You have done that already. No reason not to believe that you will not do it again.

You forgot one more thing after they beat the Chinese to death. The viets will stomp on the dead bodies, than do the Vietnamese dance.
 
.
No. You do not preserve that high-moral. You will rob them first, and then beat to death. You have done that already. No reason not to believe that you will not do it again.
Bullshit.
The people of HK hate the chicom and are fearful of mainlanders.
You can ask the former Ming refugees if they want to return to China?
 
.
Bullshit.
The people of HK hate the chicom and are fearful of mainlanders.
You can ask the former Ming refugees if they want to return to China?

People of China hate the Viet for their low morale and chimp-like behavior.

So they will be happy to send over a few hundred thousand sorry-looser over to Vietnam for a mass-slaughter.

1.4 billion are just happy to live in China. Are you happy in your Communist cess-pit of an economy?

You forgot one more thing after they beat the Chinese to death. The viets will stomp on the dead bodies, than do the Vietnamese dance.

That's classic uncivilized chimp behavior.
 
.
You Annan stabbed back Ming, so disgusting. Other countries pay tribute to Ming once a year, you pay tribute 3 times a year, greedy Annan.
Why backstabbing? Dai Viet was a sovereign nation.

You're wrong.
Vietnam paid one a year and later in every two years. You can see it as gifts for the son of heaven.
 
.
Why backstabbing?

You're wrong.
Vietnam paid one a year and later in every two years. You can see it as gifts for the son of heaven.

My mistake, it's stabbed Ming in the back.

Any source? Ming last 268 years. I don't know which year you are referring to. Annan is very greedy, you got Ming's territory, but Ming was kind to you.
 
.
meanwhile the 1.3 billion on the mainland doesn't really care.
Let see when Chinese leadership goes nuts and deploys tanks to crush the protest.

Bloodshed is common in chinese history.

but uncommon anywhere else?

No tanks here, and I know you are trying to troll. HK is 7 million people, Beijing is the center of China, can you see the difference?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom