Hi, I saw your post and found it interesting, though a common ideology amongst the pro-pakistani Bangladeshis. It amazes me these days to see so many Bangladeshis are joining the Islami Chatro Porishod which can only lead to what we can see happening with our western neighbour. Interesting is the fact that the basic tenet of Bangladesh as an independent nation, which was Bengali Nationalism, today is being sacrificed at the altar of Islamist ideology, kind of what is prevailing in Pakistan, which does not have a view of the world without the word Islam being in between. Let us go point by point:
a) Sk Hasina is empowered - Can you please elaborate as to why this should happen in Bangladesh that too after so much Islamization of your country. I believe the last Dec elections were really a "few and far between" phenomenon in Bangladesh. But my question is if the avrage Bengali is happy and contended with the way things have been say in the last couple of decades, why was the requirement of a change like this and that too with such a stupendous majority which can put a behemoth like India to shame, which in the last decade or so never had a single largest party post polls?
b) The reason of itchiness among some quarters in Bangladesh is due to the fact that this lady is now trying to do something which has been under wraps for the last 4 decades, that is opening the War Crimes files. The descendants of the Al Shams and the Razakars would definitely feel uncomfortable even with a wild dream similar to this. It is of great importance to India and of course the Bengalis to follow the course of events unfolding in Dhaka for the next few months, in terms of how the present govt takes care of the promise it has made to its public who have shown faith in her party and style of governance.
c) Bangladesh as India's Buffer state - Would have loved to comment on that but the idea is not really clear? What actually is a buffer state? I do not understand the complications of the Govt of India, why it has not been able to make Bangladesh its buffer state in the long 38 years snce the fall of Dacca. Any logical answer to this would be really appreciated
d) The problem with democracies is that the powerful military voces arent heard and does not go down well with the public. After all if it becomes the prerogative of the army to run state rationing system, public works deptt, sports bodies and the like it wihout an iota of doubt soon forget combat tactics on which the Govt invests millions of rupees annually. Can you please quote the source where he has said this? The thing is the fact that the Army in India does not talk about ruling countries, imperialism or propagate expansionist ideas on its own. Yes the Indian military would certainly do so if the GoI wishes and empowers it to do so...
e) Assasination of Army Officers of the Bangladesh Army - Can you please quote a source where a POV has been metioned to that effect? Reorganising the BDR as Indian paramilitary forces? Source please - again ...
f) Military-to-Military contact - Is there a hullabaloo when a Bangadesh Army Officer goes to the Pakistan Military Academy for training? Or say for a state visit? Then what is the issue if the Air Chief pays a routine visit to India and meet Indian defence estabishment? And yes if you are talking of gifts from the Indian Army yes there are a few officers in B'desh Army who are pro-India and there are no qualms about that. What is the big issue if the Indian army presents the best thoroughbreds to Moinuddin Ahmed? Does that make him and Indian stooge? It is a rare military honor which is bestowed upon the fortunate few...
g) Have seen a few mention of the Indo-Israeli master plan? Any clarification would greatly enhance my capabilities to answer the queries. And how putting the Bangladeshi Political leadership in jail is going o further Indian interests?
h) Yes establishing a presence in the Chittagong hill tracts area is of prime importance to the Indians..so does that make Bangladesh an Indian colony/protectorate? And if you ask the reason for it, then I shall say that this is in return for intelligence which the Indians give to the leadership of your country to avoid getting killed and martyred
i) Freedom fighters - Well if you say that the Al-Shams and the Razakars were the freedom fighters, it says all about the intention of the persons claiming themselves to be so. So you think Gen Zia ur Rehman should take the place of Muji ur Rehman right? He is the one who freed Bangladesh from the clutches of the Pakistanis? Freedom for Bangladeshis was based on the strong idea of Bengali nationalism which unfortunately today is being displayed by the supporters of the Awami League only and no other political party (read BNP). And what is the idea of Islamic muslims and Non Islamic muslims? Do you mean the divide between the liberal and the mullahs? I think I am bang on target..We do not need to create hatered and divisions within the Bagladeshi Awam, it is omnipresent and faster you guys do away with that faster is the roads to development and success for you..
j) Sheikh Hasina was ready to accept the Indian invasion/ Indian foreign minister Pronob Mukherjee announced on air their preparation of invading Bangladesh
- References please..nothing works without them...Outrageous and comic to say the least ...though I shall wait for sources...
k) Pilkhana killings - Sources of Indian hand in that ..please please ...
l) Mossad linked to 9/11 attacks: Report - Links please ? Source? Website? I ernestly hope it is not brasstacks.pk
Thanks..