Jf Thunder
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2013
- Messages
- 9,194
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
i dont have 5 minsListen to what @Luffy 500 posted its worth your 5 mins
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i dont have 5 minsListen to what @Luffy 500 posted its worth your 5 mins
Women can't lead men in prayer only women that is clear from Quran and Sunnah no ijtihad on thatI mean who will interpret / do itjihad to reform Islam with modern times so that it is accepted by all 1.6 billion Muslims?
Suppose, there is a war going on. Men are often tired and sick on the war front. Who will lead the prayers there?
To oppress non-Muslims? One can protect right of Muslims without oppressing non-Muslim minorities, can't we?
Who cares what those women did after the prophet (SAW)? Why are we blindly following their acts literally without questioning? It was tribal arab society. Not entirely modeled on Islamic principles.
Tauheen Risalat?
I don't agree with your 99 % Islamist BS!
LOL. Where has it even happened in practice?
What about God?
What is not bad?
They were before 1974! LOL
No, its not. Islamic constitution is not full of hypocrisies as is Pakistani constitution.
me ofcourseI mean who will interpret / do itjihad to reform Islam with modern times so that it is accepted by all 1.6 billion Muslims?
idiot......What about God?
sureThey were before 1974! LOL
yes the law makers were idiots, and you are the real dealNo, its not. Islamic constitution is not full of hypocrisies as out Pakistani constitution.
It was an Islamic society you just showed how big retard you are you don't know Islam better than Sahabas and wives off Prophet sawI mean who will interpret / do itjihad to reform Islam with modern times so that it is accepted by all 1.6 billion Muslims?
Suppose, there is a war going on. Men are often tired and sick on the war front. Who will lead the prayers there?
To oppress non-Muslims? One can protect right of Muslims without oppressing non-Muslim minorities, can't we?
Who cares what those women did after the prophet (SAW)? Why are we blindly following their acts literally without questioning? It was tribal arab society. Not entirely modeled on Islamic principles.
Tauheen Risalat?
I don't agree with your 99 % Islamist BS!
LOL. Where has it even happened in practice?
What about God?
What is not bad?
They were before 1974! LOL
No, its not. Islamic constitution is not full of hypocrisies as is Pakistani constitution.
Was Maududi the fool an Islamic scholar?
Muslims leading Pakistan turned into a mess for the past 60+ years? Happy now, dude?
LOL. Good point. They can't even celebrate Muharram without killing each other off.
And why can't they?
Yet you don't know who will be responsible for the interpretation in light of current times and that will be accepted by all Muslims
What if men are sick, unfit for leading prayers, what then?
LOL. Free speech means no one is above the freedom of speech. When you put prophets or their families above that, you get problems.
No, it wasn't. Not until Objectives Resolution was passed which went against Jinnah's vision for Pakistan.
LOL. True. Jahil leaders, jahil awaam.
Why penalty for blasphemy at all?
You can. Only a matter of interpretation.
Who are you? A jihadi terrorist?
Yeah but Saudis and Iranians are following PERFECT version of Shariah. Not to forget ISIS Momineens
About what?
LOL. Why is leaving Islam a crime when entering Islam is not? More hypocrisies
Who cares what Muslims did 1400 years ago? They were unaware of the principles of modern democracy.
So you say what we think has no value because it goes against some Mullahs interpretation of Islam? LOL
LOL. True.
Will it include Qadianis?
You are a known Islamist, sorry I don't take Islamists.
Islam can be implemented without state intervention. Look at Turkey or Azerbaijan, fool!
LOL. Our constitution is not Islamic. Its theocratic, full of Mullaiat!
I don't defend Qadianis. I defend all religious minorities against bigoted Muslims like yourself.
So you say and I can accept that, but your fellow Muslim Pakistanis here believe that the law which gives death penalty to those to leave Islam is quite justified while inviting others to leave their religion. That is not equal opportunity and rights.
Would not you say that it is better to tell this to him(or her) than me?
oh wow, all of them are interpretations, and Fatwas, be some scholar, and by his language he is clearly obsessed with his masculinity, which is the trait of many men nowadays...............What is your concept of women's rights?On what criteria should one judge rights of women. Our creator created men and women differently and gave them due rights. He knows whats best for us and ordained laws accordingly. What u think has no value if it goes against Quran and sunnah.
Ruling on a woman leading men in prayer - islamqa.info
Women leading prayers - islamqa.info
Women may lead women only in prayer BUT NOT men.
A starving 'brahmin' may eventually eat beef to live. But is that what he would have wanted to do given the choice or lack thereof?
You are sadly mistaken if you think human instincts have changed over the years. The companions became the best of what mankind has to offer, but it does not mean that they were not tempted by their "nafs"... what sets them apart from the Muslims who converted after them was that they had impeccable control over it.
1stly I am a she
2ndly I am no scholar I just read up and keep reading till I find few articles which sound the same or have the same meaning then I know it is not exactly wrong and worth digging in to...
3rdly I have a sound base on Islamic knowledge through my curiosity, friends I had and exposure as a kid plus few courses I took (but nothing like a degree)
4thly, God nor Islam need protection....But the evil mind does conjure evil and maligning something or oppressing its true meaning is not tolerated either!
Who cares? If men are fit for leading prayers, they can. If they aren't they can't. Stop retarding around discriminating our women!Women can't lead men in prayer only women that is clear from Quran and Sunnah no ijtihad on that
LOL. It was still very tribal Arab society who just adopted Islam. It took hundreds of years of reform to establish fiqh and Islamic schools of thoughts.It was an Islamic society you just showed how big retard you are you don't know Islam better than Sahabas and wives off Prophet saw
So who should lead instead? Maulana Diesel?those who lead pakistan in last 60+ years are barely muslims ...
Not really. Hindus were NOT allowed to draft Pakistani constitution when Objectives Resolution was adopted without minority's approval.You probably do not understand the meaning of 'equal rights'. Pakistan, as all other countries, and Pakistanis, like citizens of all other countries, are free to draft the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as they wish. The constitution will be Islamic but it is Islam itself that provides equal rights to non-Muslims and equal opportunities as well. But does that mean a Hindu can become a judge of the Shariat court, you decide.
LOL. He is insaneYour response is not connected to my post in any way. Stop acting smart, and reply directly if you can, or save me the trouble from quoting me if you cannot reply logically or directly.
And whose fault is it that Muslims too are adopting Western technology?dont forget about that fact of electronic media , that time they dont have access to TV or internet .. or phones ... so when they go to mosque they have barely one thing in mind which was Worship Allah , but today when a person go to mosque he is thinking about many stuff
it is metaphorically and can be taken a it is
Even when they didnt have a dirty mind back then, not 1 hadith shows any women leading a prayer....
Wiki doesnt give me the hadith itself nor the reference just this
Who cares what Muslims did 1400 years ago? They were unaware of the principles of modern democracy.
LOL. Where has it even happened in practice?