Can China catch up with India in space race?

[Beast]

if in one piece, it's still something, but on the back tens of thousands of pieces

Until now, the 1.55m short Indian wanted to laugh at 1.80m taller Chinese. So much of their inferiority complex. They are very upset they have totally 0% edge over Chinese in space advancement.

China is now playing with US only. Not even ESA or Russian space agency. Not to mention ISRO. JAXA is even superior than ISRO. Their HN-2 rocket responsible to send UAE mars probe. JAXA is also responsible to send one module for part of ISS.

ISRO has zero.

 

[lonelyman]

Until now, the 1.55m short Indian wanted to laugh at 1.80m taller Chinese. So much of their inferiority complex. They are very upset they have totally 0% edge over Chinese in space advancement.

China is now playing with US only. Not even ESA or Russian space agency. Not to mention ISRO. JAXA is even superior than ISRO. Their HN-2 rocket responsible to send UAE mars probe. JAXA is also responsible to send one module for part of ISS.

ISRO has zero.

ISRO is the dalit of all capable space agencies

 

[Surya 1]

Until now, the 1.55m short Indian wanted to laugh at 1.80m taller Chinese. So much of their inferiority complex. They are very upset they have totally 0% edge over Chinese in space advancement.

China is now playing with US only. Not even ESA or Russian space agency. Not to mention ISRO. JAXA is even superior than ISRO. Their HN-2 rocket responsible to send UAE mars probe. JAXA is also responsible to send one module for part of ISS.

ISRO has zero.

Dwarf chinese has a great passion to look taller atleast on media .

 

[Beast]

Dwarf chinese has a great passion to look taller atleast on media .

Inferior being has no right to talk about China. Tortoise vikram on Moon is joke.

India is just a small fry.

Our great Zhurong is going to roll on Mars tomorrow!

I will tag your name when it started. And you u can save salt for your next meal

 

[KAL-EL]

Even america cannot catch up with india in the space race.

I’m sad..

But for real though, when India does make it to Mars, I hope it doesn’t participate in the cover-up of artificial structures like the USA and China are doing.

 

[Surya 1]

Inferior being has no right to talk about China. Tortoise vikram on Moon is joke.

India is just a small fry.

Our great Zhurong is going to roll on Mars tomorrow!

I will tag your name when it started. And you u can save salt for your next meal

Once agai small big. Small Chinese has a great passion to look big.

 

[Beast]

Once agai small big. Small Chinese has a great passion to look big.

Salty Indian. The feeling of being left behind must be terrible for you. If I am in your shoe, I would have killed myself to save from humiliation. Luckily I am Chinese

Big Chinese talk big. Nothing wrong. This is what all superpower do. Unlike some small fry pretend to be big.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

again another delusional Indian knows nothing about rocket design and engineering but tweet BJP IT cell instructions

Long March 3B - GTO payload 5.5 ton
PSLV - GTO payload 1.3 ton
GSLV III - GTO payload 4 ton

if you talk about efficiency, Long March 3B achieve higher payload with much less lift-off weight than your GSLV III

how the heck Long March 3 is as powerful as PSLV?

your today latest GSLV rocket is even less powerful than our 80s technology, let alone Long march 5 and upcoming 9

I don't know how China can catch up with India but catch down

I talked of Long March 3, not 3B. 3B is just a predecessor of Long March 5. 3B was much later upgraded from long march 3. I was responding to someone comparing GSLV 3 to LM3. You introduced 3B baselessly just to boost your ego. LM3 is equivalent to PSLV

I don't see how size is a determinant of technology? I have already stated that Saturn 5 that was used in Apollo mission was ultra large. But that does not mean they were of better technology than Long march 5. Similarly, larger rockets are not signs of better technology in any way. India does not need a rocket that carries more than 6tons and this has been said openly by ISRO chairman. So, India won't design bigger rockets that consume hundreds of thousands of tons of extra fuel

PSLV engine is also a license copy of Viking engine which is 60s or early 70s technology.

Good luck with such theories. Tomorrow you may even claim that PSLV is a licensed copy of firecracker rockets.

Right man, try go cheap and end up with vikram rover landed like tortoise on moon. So cheap project means cheap result. Indian are just keep giving excuse to mask their technology inferiority. There is no point go cheap if it cant get the result or non desirable experiment.

I will not be surprised Indian will compromised manned mission safety at the expense of going cheap!

We all saw how Chinese landing on moon failed so spectacularly. So, think before commenting on Vikram lander. India does these things only for PR stunt and has no real strategic objectives. Why should India spend unnecessary money on these when they serve no purpose? That is why India does these things in a cheap manner. No one is stopping others from doing the same.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Until now, the 1.55m short Indian wanted to laugh at 1.80m taller Chinese. So much of their inferiority complex. They are very upset they have totally 0% edge over Chinese in space advancement.

China is now playing with US only. Not even ESA or Russian space agency. Not to mention ISRO. JAXA is even superior than ISRO. Their HN-2 rocket responsible to send UAE mars probe. JAXA is also responsible to send one module for part of ISS.

ISRO has zero.

Since when did Chinese become tall? By the way, China has not surpassed Russia in any way

 

[Beast]

Since when did Chinese become tall? By the way, China has not surpassed Russia in any way

Tomorrow I will call u when history in the making of Zhurong rover.

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Since when did Chinese become tall? By the way, China has not surpassed Russia in any way

Russia? Seriously? Russia can't even send a rocket to Mars. Russia has no modern rocket that can get to Mars.

 

[Beast]

We all saw how Chinese landing on moon failed so spectacularly. So, think before commenting on Vikram lander. India does these things only for PR stunt and has no real strategic objectives. Why should India spend unnecessary money on these when they serve no purpose? That is why India does these things in a cheap manner. No one is stopping others from doing the same.

Tell me how Chinese moon landing failed spectacularly? Genius.

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Tell me how Chinese moon landing failed spectacularly? Genius.

How many attempts did it take for China? India did only 1 attempt and failed in it. If India makes multiple attempts, it will also land. As i said, India sees to unimportant things like moon landing in a shoestring budget solely for PR and hence has not launched multiple landers. So, compare accordingly.

 

[DocEinstein]

In all honesty we know that China and India are no match, it would be in the interest of India to stop deluding them itself in this fake image created by west to pitch India against China. India is at least 50 years behind China.

Something does not jive here...
How can India be 50 years behind China when India had internet and Vedic technology 5000 years ago

 

[Taimoor Khan]

So in 1971 China had a $2.8 trillion economy, ASAT, Hypersonic Test vehicles, 687.6 million internet users ?

If you are Cheerleadering atleast do so without knowledge obtained from Anjem Choudhary sermons

Last time I checked, your Punjab cheif minister was pleading with Modi regime to allow emergency supply of oxygen from Pakistan.

Please. For you own sake, get off this non sense and acknowledge the third world status of your country.