What's new

''Blinders'' Played Crucial Role in PAF Assault

And yet the will make a lot more sense than a deluded indian who believes the fables of his own creation or those of his government and never ever question what ever is sold to them...
Furthering your point, they didn't even release a forensic analysis as to how 350KGs of explosives, that was said to have been used in the Pulwama blast, were acquired and transported to the blast location despite being enroute to several military checkpoints and also most of the passable locations of the LoC is fenced from the Indian side and constantly manned & patrolled and also enforced with motion sensor guns.
 
While Su30Mki's air superiority was destroyed there that day exposing its worthiness of air superiority it was not only thanks to the pilots of the PAF that they exposed their abilities so many ill tactics of IAF but some hidden soldiers doing an amazing job.
That day Su30mki was was suppose to rise up to 40000+ feet engage and track multiple targets at once and kill at least 2 of them with BVR weapons before even been detected or putting the fighter in danger while the pilots enjoyed the views from the cockpit of Su30Mki it was suppose to see first kill first and go back.
But it never happened and PM Modi accepted him self that Rafael Jets could have played a different role here and the results could have been may be better or different.
Since there was no match for Su30mki in PAF's entire inventory.
But it never happened Su30mki was beaten they never dared to cross LOC beyond few miles thanks to PAF pilots controlling PAF assets they even were unable to protect Mig-21 bison of Abhi who's prime responsibility was to attack ground targets which he himself said in an interview that his responsibility and task was to fin his target on the ground and attack it, while the rest of IAF watched his back which they failed Pilot Abhi Nandhan was supposed to be protected by the rest of IAF air superiority fighters while he focuses him self on ground only.
Here Pakistan might have used some thing else then digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) based jammers which focus on and jam a single frequency since IAF fighters had AESA radars and DRFM based radio jammers have very little effects on these.
IAF failed miserably and they were so afraid their jets were seen releasing flare with out any reason showing the panic the pilot and ground control across LOC was at that time.......
Here a hidden force was working in the background and that is electronics warfare and radio jamming may be in the form of passive and active arrays of radio emitters scrambling and disrupting all communication links beyond understanding.
The entire battlefield was so over crowded by radio interference by PAF that IAF's communication links were not only disturbed but they failed on multiple times and the chances are that Pilot Abhi Nandhan failed to receive a fall back order given to him to return back home and not to go ahead into the danger zone which he failed to receive because of electronic warfare and radio jamming showing PAF's edge in yet another undisclosed field of ground engineering, radio and microwave links jamming or in the air borne early warning aircrafts working their job well to disrupt enemy communication links....
Giving results that every one accepted even on international levels

There is also another informative thread by @Windjammer:
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/blin...le-in-paf-assault.610576/page-9#post-11321781
 
Indians doesnt hahave AESA ina ny fighter. MKI has Pesa radars.
Doesn't matter AESA is active and PESA is passive their both capabilities of anti jamming are almost the same pESA being little better AESA and PESA are both electronically scanned arrays we are talking about jamming here and we did it well

If he was looking for ground targets then how his planes has 2x R73 and 2x r77. It make no sense
You ask him he said it him self that his job was to attack ground targets watch his video
 
Bro DRFM is an old tech which works on single frequencies we have some thing beyond that since to foul SU30mkis AESA radar which works on array of multiple frequencies you need some thing more than just DRFM which is a basic radio interference tool.we fouled su30s and this might give you answers that we have much more capable systems then DRFMs believe me in that its my field and i work on microwave radio technologies.
SU-30MKI has PESA radar known as N011M Bars Radar.
 
rubbish post, what a waste of time

little kids are running practically naked on this board , d****s swinging
 
Harris disagrees with you

The ALQ-211 is integrated into the CV-22 Osprey Special Operations aircraft, Norwegian NH 90 multi-mission helicopter and is on board international F-16 fighters for Chile, Poland, Pakistan, Turkey and Oman. The self-protection system is also applicable for pod-mounted applications and unmanned aerial vehicles.
https://www.harris.com/solution/analq-211-cv-22-nh-90-and-f-16-self-protection-system

https://www.defenseindustrydaily.co...es-upgrades-weapons-for-pakistans-f16s-02396/
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190401-170108.jpg
    Screenshot_20190401-170108.jpg
    344.3 KB · Views: 2,913
Bro DRFM is an old tech which works on single frequencies we have some thing beyond that since to foul SU30mkis AESA radar which works on array of multiple frequencies you need some thing more than just DRFM which is a basic radio interference tool.we fouled su30s and this might give you answers that we have much more capable systems then DRFMs believe me in that its my field and i work on microwave radio technologies.
Actually su 30 mki don't have aesa but pesa radars still very powerful
Indian deal with Russia's to covert em to super flanker standard would have aesa installed in em
But its pending :)

Its known fact paf used jamming to large extent Indians in panic even shot down own helicopter

Could be some special item bought from turks ;)
 
Harris disagrees with you

The ALQ-211 is integrated into the CV-22 Osprey Special Operations aircraft, Norwegian NH 90 multi-mission helicopter and is on board international F-16 fighters for Chile, Poland, Pakistan, Turkey and Oman. The self-protection system is also applicable for pod-mounted applications and unmanned aerial vehicles.
https://www.harris.com/solution/analq-211-cv-22-nh-90-and-f-16-self-protection-system

If ALQ-211 have played the part of EW then it debunk the claim by PAF that no F-16 was near the Indian border / were not use in combat .:undecided:
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom