Irony Number 1
The CPC Red Army are not fighting the Japanese except for one campaign (Hundred Regiment Offensive). The Commander Marshal Peng Dehuai get shit and fighting Japanese is his cardinal Sin.
Hundred Regiments Offensive - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Below is wikipedia
Peng and Mao had disagreed over how directly to confront the Japanese since at least the Luochuan Conference in August 1937, with Mao concerned about Communist losses to the well equipped Japanese. After the establishment of the People's Republic Mao is alleged to have said to Lin Biao that "allowing Japan to occupy more territory is the only way to love your country. Otherwise, it would have become a country that loved Chiang Kai-shek." Thus, the Hundred Regiments Offensive became the last of the two major Communist frontal engagements against the Japanese during the war. There had been controversy that Peng had no authorization, even no knowledge of Central Military Committee and Mao Zedong. As early as 1945 the accusation of launching battle without telling Mao had appeared in the North China Conference. During the Great Leap Forward, Peng's bad temper led to his downfall and then the launching of the battle became yet again a criminal action in Cultural Revolution. In 1967, the Red Guard group of Tsinghua University, with the support of Central Cultural Revolution Committee issued a leaflet saying "The mug Peng, along with Zhu De, launched the offensive to defend Chongqin ... He rejected Chairman Mao's instruction and mobilized 105 regiments in an adventuristic pulse ... Chairman Mao said 'How can Peng Dehuai make such a big move without consulting me? Our forces are completely revealed. The result shall be terrible.'"
Marshal Peng Dehuai
4th big Irony
The role of USSR Red army in China was to help CPC wage terrorism against the KMT Chinese government. Even China TV now admits.
专访习近平接见的二战老兵：习仲勋给我留下很深的印象|加列耶夫| 中国_凤凰资讯
Well said.How about the Irony that India is invited?
Irony 1.
India was fighting under the British.
Irony 2
Indian soldiers defected and formed the Indian National Army and together with the Imperial Japanese army actually fought against the British and allied forces.
Captain Mohan Singh (in turban) of the Indian National Army being greeted by the Japanese Major Fujiwara Iwaichi, April 1942
Mohan Singh is now a national hero in India.
Irony 3
During the Tokyo War Crimes Trials the Justice Radhabinod Pal of India dismissed the legitimacy of the IMTFE as victor's justice:
1. Lux de Veritas read less history of last WWIIHow about the Irony that India is invited?
Irony 1.
India was fighting under the British.
Irony 2
Indian soldiers defected and formed the Indian National Army and together with the Imperial Japanese army actually fought against the British and allied forces.
Captain Mohan Singh (in turban) of the Indian National Army being greeted by the Japanese Major Fujiwara Iwaichi, April 1942
Mohan Singh is now a national hero in India.
Irony 3
During the Tokyo War Crimes Trials the Justice Radhabinod Pal of India dismissed the legitimacy of the IMTFE as victor's justice:
Stalin played both sides, but most of all, he played Mao and the CCP more than he played Chiang and the KMT.
No...But that does not mean you would not revise history, like you just tried.
How about the Irony that India is invited?
Irony 1.
India was fighting under the British.
Irony 2
Indian soldiers defected and formed the Indian National Army and together with the Imperial Japanese army actually fought against the British and allied forces.
Captain Mohan Singh (in turban) of the Indian National Army being greeted by the Japanese Major Fujiwara Iwaichi, April 1942
Mohan Singh is now a national hero in India.
Irony 3
During the Tokyo War Crimes Trials the Justice Radhabinod Pal of India dismissed the legitimacy of the IMTFE as victor's justice:
LOL ... Enemy's enemy is my friend, not only Stalin the U.S also played both sides in China ... the Washington only support KMT ?! LOL ... the U.S absolutely not as NAIVE as today American thought that. Well during 1943~1947 there was a U.S.A military working group stationed in CCP's Yan'an city to assist Mao’s CCP. The truth was in the China Battlefield of WWII, U.S supported both Chiang's KMT and Mao's CCP to against Imperial Japan.
I said some Indian joint NAZI Germany Army, not all ... OKay ? And what i talked here has historic photos to prove it, not like others making fake WWII history.
The US wanted a unified China, so of course when faced with competing factions the US did reached out to Mao, but American OFFICIAL support was for Chiang Kai-shek. Major decisions at the partners level did not contained Mao. Take Indochina, for example, the plan to take Indochina away from France and put under UN custody was made with the US, Russia, and China with Chiang Kai-shek, not Mao, as representative for China.
Well today that's not importance, i think the TaiWan (KMT's ROC) had got used to abandoned by the Washington of U.S ... 1st abandoned in 1949 back to TaiWan, 2nd abandoned in 1971 from UNSC, 3rd abandoned in 1972 President visited China, 4th abandoned in 1979 Sino-U.S nations establish diplomatic relations ... so i think even U.S agree the true Chinese come from mainland of China, not TaiWan island.
It is important enough that your friend tried to revise history by implying, not too subtle, that somehow Mao and the CCP were oh-sooooooo heroic that they were oh-soooooooo alone and helpless yet overcame adversities by their lonesome and defeated Chiang and the KMT by themselves.
