Ancient Man and His First Civilizations.Proving Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth and severe lie

[Fattyacids]

Ok be glad with that, no point of explaining anything to a bot, just keep running around in circles

LOL, resorting to personal attack again. Deep down, you know you've lost the argument

 

[manlion]

By the way brahui people are not related to South Indians or even North Indians. They have lowest amount of ASI among South Asians, even lower then pashtuns and baloch.

There are 2 main theories regarding the Brahuis.

1) ancient Elamo-Dravidians of the IVC
2) migrants from central India

Over the centuries, due to their location, the Brahui have mixed with Iranians, Sindhis etc. Physically and culturally , they resemble their neighbors, rather than the Dravidians of South India.

Which again proves genetics and languages don't go hand in hand. While Indo-Aryan Sri Lanka Sinhalese and Dravidian Tamil in Sri Lanka are almost same people genetically. There maybe some difference in looks which only Sri Lankans can tell if its true or not.

But genetically they are same.

Sinhalas were ex Tamils before they conversion to Buddhism, similar to , Keralites , who were ex Tamils 800 yrs ago. Both lost their Tamilness due to foreign religion infusion , Buddhism into Sinhala Lanka and Aryan Brahmanism into Kerala . Religion can play a key role in replacing a language, as it happened in India Sanskrit replacing the old Dravidian languages

 

[Vinod2070]

Ok be glad with that, no point of explaining anything to a bot, just keep running around in circles

Ignoring them is the best policy. You know that one about pigs and shyt right?

 

[INDIC]

Sometimes it is difficult to decide if such people are more idiots or ignorant.

By the way, I can't understand why people like @faithfulguy and @Fattyacids so keen in inventing idiotic history for Indian identity based on things in antiquity that happened 3000-4000 years ago when their own history is original Hans of Hwang Ho river plains defeating so called Cooked and Uncooked Barbarians and assimilating them as Han Chinese. The Southern China was still a non-Han majority territory just 1000 years back when late Tang Dynasty assimilated Southern China as Han Chinese.

 

[Shabaz Sharif]

There are 2 main theories regarding the Brahuis.

1) ancient Elamo-Dravidians of the IVC
2) migrants from central India

Over the centuries, due to their location, the Brahui have mixed with Iranians, Sindhis etc. Physically and culturally , they resemble their neighbors, rather than the Dravidians of South India.



Sinhalas were ex Tamils before they conversion to Buddhism, similar to , Keralites , who were ex Tamils 800 yrs ago. Both lost their Tamilness due to foreign religion infusion , Buddhism into Sinhala Lanka and Aryan Brahmanism into Kerala . This shows religion is the key factor in replacing a language as it happened in India after Aryanisation, with Sanskrit replacing the old Dravidian languages

[/quote]

Brahui being migrants from Central India theory has been put to rest by genetic tests. They couldnt have gotten lower ASI by mixing with Sindhis who have considerably more ASI ancestry or Baloch who have little bit more ASI then Brahui.

 

[LURKER]

Ignoring them is the best policy. You know that one about pigs and shyt right?

Guess you're right bro, no point arguing a brain dead zombie.

 

[INDIC]

@Fattyacids Where did you read that Xuanzang saw people speaking Hindi in North India when modern Indian languages still to be originated from Prakrit.

 

[Fattyacids]

@Fattyacids Where did you read that Xuanzang saw people speaking Hindi in North India when modern Indian languages still to be originated from Prakrit.

I never said that. @INDIC There is a search function here, show me the post where I said that.

I said Hindi came from the Mughal, as with most of your living culture like food and music. They are Persia-nized

 

[Vinod2070]

By the way, I can't understand why people like @faithfulguy and @Fattyacids so keen in inventing idiotic history for Indian identity based on things in antiquity that happened 3000-4000 years ago when their own history is original Hans of Hwang Ho river plains defeating so called Cooked and Uncooked Barbarians and assimilating them as Han Chinese. The Southern China was still a non-Han majority territory just 1000 years back when late Tang Dynasty assimilated Southern China as Han Chinese.

Some reasons I can think of:

Lack of self esteem
Geopolitics
Sheer pettiness and jealousy
Some personal incident where some Indian kicked their arse (in academics, jobs...)

 

[INDIC]

@sreekumar The genetic studies shows the emergence of strong endogamy(marrying within the same community) originated only 1900 years ago around 1st century. Thus the origin of caste system is a very late phase in our culture.

All Indians irrespective of being in North and South or any caste or tribes share a common ancestry from both the so called Indo-Aryan and so called Dravidians referred by geneticists by proper term as Ancestral North Indians(ANI) and Ancestral South Indians(ASI).

 

[manlion]

Brahui being migrants from Central India theory has been put to rest by genetic tests. They couldnt have gotten lower ASI by mixing with Sindhis who have considerably more ASI ancestry or Baloch who have little bit more ASI then Brahui.

what has a lower ASI got to do with Brahuis ?

Genetical Brahuis display Haplogroups- R1A and J of the Y DNA (refer to diagrams)

Haplogroup R1a



Haplogroup J

 

[Vinod2070]

By the way, I can't understand why people like @faithfulguy and @Fattyacids so keen in inventing idiotic history for Indian identity based on things in antiquity that happened 3000-4000 years ago when their own history is original Hans of Hwang Ho river plains defeating so called Cooked and Uncooked Barbarians and assimilating them as Han Chinese. The Southern China was still a non-Han majority territory just 1000 years back when late Tang Dynasty assimilated Southern China as Han Chinese.

Guess many of these people here fit the bill.

 

[INDIC]

I never said that. @INDIC There is a search function here, show me the post where I said that.

I said Hindi came from the Mughal, as with most of your living culture like food and music. They are Persia-nized

You said Xuanzang saw people speaking Hindi and I corrected you by mentioning Prakrit. BTW you are confusing between Urdu and Hindi, Urdu is Persianized , Hindi has very few Persians words. I also saw you claiming Rigveda is monotheist. You are very good at inventing fake history both of India and China.

 

[Fattyacids]

You said Xuanzang saw people speaking Hindi and I corrected you by mentioning Prakrit. BTW you are confusing between Urdu and Hindi, Urdu is Persianized , Hindi has very few Persians words. I also saw you claiming Rigveda is monotheist. You are very good at inventing fake history both of India and China.

No, I never said that. I'm still waiting for you to show the post

I said Hindi came from Mughal, as with most of your living culture.

Rigveda is as monotheist as Zorotrasian. Hinduism is a spin off from Vedic.

Fake is when you made accusation, but cannot pull out my post to prove it.

 

[INDIC]

No, I never said that. I'm still waiting for you to show the post

I said Hindi came from Mughal, as with most of your living culture.

Rigveda is as monotheist as Zorotrasian. Hinduism is a spin off from Vedic.

Fake is when you made accusation, but cannot pull out my post to prove it.

Hindi is referred as an Indo-Aryan language still very much identical to the Khariboli spoken before the arrival of Turks-Mughals and Rigveda mentioned numerous Hindu Gods. Zoroastrianism originated from polytheist Iranian religion.
Rigvedic deities - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now can you narrate your fake history of both India and China to someone else. It won't work here.