What's new

Ancient Man and His First Civilizations.Proving Aryan Invasion Theory is a myth and severe lie

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Informally" is the keyword genius :lol: nevermind you are not programmed to understand that.

Now you've shiffted the goalpost to acronym :cheesy:

Buzz off now

752450429_TrollSpray_answer_5_xlarge.jpeg
:cheesy:



Informally it is known as UL or UoL. Every website related to U of London proves it. :omghaha:

i-see-stupid-people.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
The point of the entire discussion was that Aryan and Dravidian are language categories, not races.

And it took you 506 messages to find out.

There are many who are claiming otherwise here. Even now.

You would be infinitely better off reading and improving your knowledge than ticking off boxes.

You are right. I am doing precisely that.

Got myself a book last weekend and reading through that.

One of the thing that struck me from the book is the very precise "markers" of the Indian leftist historians (who have had a completely free run of the academia and discourse so far), their motives, their pet peeves etc. This was also aligned to my own observations from the field.

I was talking of those tick boxes here.

As an example, one of the eye opener for me was when I saw the extremely vitriolic reaction to Rajiv Malhotra's initiative to write about Indian contributions to Science. You would think that should be innocuous and could not harm anyone and should not invite the kind of reaction it did.

That it did so should tell us about the agendas at work.

Then we can see the extreme vitriol (many times it is just so absurd and comes out of nowhere) against "Hindu fanatics", "Hindu fundamentalists", "Brahmins" that is just amazing and seems almost unhinged.

I find it amazing that a person with such great scholarship (that I can never hope to match) should allow himself to be driven by such agendas and by such extreme vitriol.
 
.
dear late comer, the discussion is on 'Aryan invasion theory a myth' and not the mythological Bharatavarsha . And Dravidian refers to linguistic grouping not 'geographical term' as there are 4 million Brahuis in Pakistan who speak a Northern Dravidian language.


some homework


By the way brahui people are not related to South Indians or even North Indians. They have lowest amount of ASI among South Asians, even lower then pashtuns and baloch. Which again proves genetics and languages don't go hand in hand. While Indo-Aryan Sri Lanka Sinhalese and Dravidian Tamil in Sri Lanka are almost same people genetically. There maybe some difference in looks which only Sri Lankans can tell if its true or not.

But genetically they are same.
 
.
By the way brahui people are not related to South Indians or even North Indians. They have lowest amount of ASI among South Asians, even lower then pashtuns and baloch. Which again proves genetics and languages don't go hand in hand. While Indo-Aryan Sri Lanka Sinhalese and Dravidian Tamil in Sri Lanka are almost same people genetically. There maybe some difference in looks which only Sri Lankans can tell if its true or not.

But genetically they are same.

The people west of the Indus were never related to the people east of the Indus speaking Indo-Aryan languages.
 
. .
The people west of the Indus were never related to the people east of the Indus speaking Indo-Aryan languages.

Punjabis live east of indus as well, its only when pashtuns come they become majority. You are troll so no point explaining this to you. Anyway Brahui people are dravidian speaking but not South Indians genetically.
 
. . .
Dont try to act too smart high IQ bot when you aren't. When i said London University or for that matter University of London it refers to him being the alumnus of one of the colleges which constitute the University, just as a person studying in any of the colleges of Delhi University can say he/she studied in a particular college of DU or Delhi University itself as DU does not have its own campus but made up of several colleges.

These are losers who have no idea of what they are talking about.

Like one loser keeps on repeating like a parrot (being brainwashed comes naturally to their ilk it would seem) that Hinduism and "Vedic" are different.

How do you even respond to such pathetic idiots who have no friggin idea other than what they read from some odd forum on the internet with no cultural context.

Some of the key stages of Hinduism:

Vedic period- Over a period it become purely based on rituals and lost the spirit behind them

Vedantic- Bring the focus back on the essence of Vedas and not just rituals

Puranic or bhakti

Contemporary or modern Hinduism

You can probably add some more. This is just a natural evolution of the oldest religion in the world that the ignorant idiots are just not aware of, they need to get their pathetic ignorant noses in still.
 
.
These are losers who have no idea of what they are talking about.

Like one loser keeps on repeating like a parrot (being brainwashed comes naturally to their ilk it would seem) that Hinduism and "Vedic" are different.

How do you even respond to such pathetic idiots who have no friggin idea other than what they read from some odd forum on the internet with no cultural context.

Some of the key stages of Hinduism:

Vedic period- Over a period it become purely based on rituals and lost the spirit behind them

Vedantic- Bring the focus back on the essence of Vedas and not just rituals

Puranic or bhakti

Contemporary or modern Hinduism

You can probably add some more. This is just a natural evolution of the oldest religion in the world that the ignorant idiots are just not aware of, they need to get their pathetic ignorant noses in still.

@Fattyacids once told me that Xuanzang saw Indians speaking Hindi(instead of Prakrit) when he arrived in North India. :omghaha::omghaha:
 
. .
Punjabis live east of indus as well, its only when pashtuns come they become majority. You are troll so no point explaining this to you. Anyway Brahui people are dravidian speaking but not South Indians genetically.

You took it wrong, we Indians hardly claim ourselves related to people West of the Indus and that's supports your claim.
 
. .
@Fattyacids once told me that Xuanzang saw Indians speaking Hindi(instead of Prakrit) when he arrived in North India. :omghaha::omghaha:



It doesn't get any more retarded than this. Pulling crap of your ***. How low will you go? Sell yr mother ?
Search function is here, use it, back up what you said. I'm waiting. Dumb troll.
 
Last edited:
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom