What's new

Ancient India had aeroplanes, nuclear weapons, says chief of India's premier history body

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you read my post? I wrote that there are drawings and elaborate discussion is there on the dedicated book on Vimanshastra which history channel people displayed.

Vimanika shastra is a pile of horseshyte, even the professors of IIT has disregarded it as anything but scientific.
 
. . .
Do you read my post? I wrote that there are drawings and elaborate discussion is there on the dedicated book on Vimanshastra which history channel people displayed.
"Any reader by now would have concluded the obvious – that the planes described above are the best poor concoctions, rather than expressions of something real. None of the planes has properties or capabilities of being flown; the geometries are unimaginably horrendous from the point of view of flying; and the principles of propulsion make them resist rather than assist flying. The text and the drawings do not correlate with each other even thematically. The drawings definitely point to a knowledge of modern machinery. This can be explained on the basis of the fact that Shri Ellappa who made the drawings was in a local engineering college and was thus familiar with names and details of some machinery. Of course the text retains a structure in language and content from which its 'recent nature' cannot be asserted. We must hasten to point out that this does not imply an oriental nature of the text at all. All that may be said is that thematically the drawings ought to be ruled out of discussion. And the text, as it stands, is incomplete and ambiguous by itself and incorrect at many places".

It was concluded by a team of researchers from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.
 
.
Vimanika shastra is a pile of horseshyte, even the professors of IIT has disregarded it as anything but scientific.


Being disagree is a different thing. We also disagree on many issue. But let us accept that the shastra was there. We can agree here.
 
. .
Vimanika shastra is a pile of horseshyte, even the professors of IIT has disregarded it as anything but scientific.

Its actually a pile of very old fairytales:sarcastic:
Not much different from nagaraj:pleasantry:
 
.
.
Being disagree is a different thing. We also disagree on many issue. But let us accept that the shastra was there. We can agree here.



Why with shastra no planes are build, even if there was/is a single reference of plane being build, why didnt that field grow further like all other fields and made more?? have people gone stupid or those people got wiped out like dinosaurs???

These are basic logical questions.
 
.
You are so idiot that all source accept which suite your ill informed brain is Bizzare for you. Why do not you search and see the video.

So do you believe that ancient Indians had planes, nukes, and warp drive? Was ancient India visited by Klingons or Romulans.
 
.
So do you believe that ancient Indians had planes, nukes, and warp drive? Was ancient India visited by Klingons or Romulans.


Yes I believe. May not be Nukes exactly but may be other very devastating weapon.
 
.
Yes, Youtube and Ancient Alien in History Channel is the benchmark of scientific consensus and acceptability for general populace.

So now you know why people of other nationalities make fun of some Indian comments.
 
. .
So do you believe that ancient Indians had planes, nukes, and warp drive? Was ancient India visited by Klingons or Romulans.

We even had a death star and our own yoda training thousands of jedi knights for protection of universe.
The vimanas were their means of transportation :coffee::butcher:
 
.
Yes I believe. May not be Nukes exactly but may be other very devastating weapon.

There are always devastating weapons at different part of history. Do you know that we have lost the knowledge of the formula for Greek Fire. And Greek Fire is a devastating weapon. But in no way would Greek Fire come close to a nuke. Which is what your minister is asserting.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom