Ancient India had aeroplanes, nuclear weapons, says chief of India's premier history body

[HariPrasad]

just because you don't know how something works does not mean no one does.
and making liquid fuel from coal is not some lost secret, people do not wonder, we simply don't do it because there are better alternatives.

we also dont make radioactive, glow in the dark, watches anymore, but that dont mean we dont know how to make it.

and for the record, about claims of ancient indian nukes/super weapons/planes...
just three words. LAUGH OUT LOUD

Low on IQ high on Ego.

 

[syedali73]

People want to achieve it today. People who a an abandon of coal want to make gasoline out of that but that knowledge is lost.

Exactly. Researchers were working on that. They seem to have got a break through. Many country were busy in getting the old document of Second WW which may shed the light on this technology.

Merey Bhai, the process is called "Bergius process", which is used to produce liquid hydrocarbons by hydrogenation of high-volatile bituminous coal at high temperature and pressure. The liquid hydrocarbons can then be used as fuel provided they are combustible. Friedrich Bergius, obtained a patent in 1913 on this process. No knowledge is lost and the process is known and taught in colleges.

 

[applesauce]

Low on IQ high on Ego.

what a great description of yourself.

 

[Donatello]

India, never ceases to amaze.

 

[HariPrasad]

Merey Bhai, the process is called "Bergius process", which is used to produce liquid hydrocarbons by hydrogenation of high-volatile bituminous coal at high temperature and pressure. The liquid hydrocarbons can then be used as fuel provided they are combustible. Friedrich Bergius, obtained a patent in 1913 on this process. No knowledge is lost and the process is known and taught in colleges.

See I had read that German had done that in Second WW and subsequently the technique was lost and people were busy in searching the documents to revive that process once again. If I accept that what I read was false and what you say is right, even though you would accept that over a period of time some know hows are lost and only its mention in history remains. e.g Dhaka Malmal. etc. Here I just wanted to argue that something which has a mention in history and we are not able to do that today does not prove that it did not exist some time in past. So the argument that why we are not able to make VIman out that today is not valid. I accept and respect the view of members who believe that there was no such thing like vimana in past. I simple disagree with logic of proving that wrong.

 

[HariPrasad]

India, never ceases to amaze.

Yes We amazed the world with Mangal Yaan recently.

 

[HariPrasad]

Knowledge is not lost... a basic drawing must be in old transcripts... that doesnt mean they made any prototypes or they have actually done it.... just like flower showers from heaven above.

But Simultaneously it doesn't prove that it was not there. Am i wrong?

 

[HariPrasad]

Care to explain what you mean?

dead, rotting and infected animals into the city. It worked pretty fine, there are even early examples of bio hazard weapons.

Source: Ancient India had aeroplanes, nuclear weapons, says chief of India's premier history body | Page 12

 

[Skull and Bones]

But Simultaneously it doesn't prove that it was not there. Am i wrong?

This conundrum which you're referring to is a well known tactic for scientifically illiterates. And can be equally applied to Unicorns, Dragons, one eyed cyclops and tooth fairy.

 

[he-man]

dead, rotting and infected animals into the city. It worked pretty fine, there are even early examples of bio hazard weapons.

Source: Ancient India had aeroplanes, nuclear weapons, says chief of India's premier history body | Page 12

U are being illogical ans irrational here.

 

[he-man]

This conundrum which you're referring to is a well known tactic for scientifically illiterates. And can be equally applied to Unicorns, Dragons, one eyed cyclops and tooth fairy.

U mean nagraj does not exist?

 

[he-man]

 

[HariPrasad]

This conundrum which you're referring to is a well known tactic for scientifically illiterates. And can be equally applied to Unicorns, Dragons, one eyed cyclops and tooth fairy.

Your example is irrelevant. All you quoted is fictitious.

My believing is based on the logic that there are so many marvelous things build in that era which we can see today ranging from Excellent construction of Minakshi temple to Yoga to Ayurveda. The civilization which the capability to create marvel in those days may have capabilities in other areas as well.

It is supported by a lots and lots of ancient text have a mention of that.

There are dedicated books on the topic.

It is a question of judgement. You are free to not believe that.

Do you know what ISRO chairman said after successful launch of Mangal yaan. He said that it shows our ability to predict. When you do not have a complete information on subject, You make prediction and judgement. They may prove either right or wrong or neither right nor wrong. You are a researcher. Tell me whether the theories of creation of universe has any scientific evidence? Some theory pop up and others is either proved wrong or incomplete. You generally believe what is latest.

 

[Skull and Bones]

U mean nagraj does not exist?

Fuk You

Only Doga is worth the time of all the creatures from Raj Comics. I heard that a movie is in the making.

 

[ACE OF THE AIR]

ERIC VAN DANIKEN Knew about this