What's new

Ancient India had aeroplanes, nuclear weapons, says chief of India's premier history body

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fuk You :mad:

Only Doga is worth the time of all the creatures from Raj Comics. I heard that a movie is in the making.

Yeah anurag kashyap will probably make it but no timeframe given.
But nagraj will remain numero uno:bunny:
 
.
Your example is irrelevant. All you quoted is fictitious.

My believing is based on the logic that there are so many marvelous things build in that era which we can see today ranging from Excellent construction of Minakshi temple to Yoga to Ayurveda. The civilization which the capability to create marvel in those days may have capabilities in other areas as well.

It is supported by a lots and lots of ancient text have a mention of that.

There are dedicated books on the topic.

It is a question of judgement. You are free to not believe that.

Do you know what ISRO chairman said after successful launch of Mangal yaan. He said that it shows our ability to predict. When you do not have a complete information on subject, You make prediction and judgement. They may prove either right or wrong or neither right nor wrong. You are a researcher. Tell me whether the theories of creation of universe has any scientific evidence? Some theory pop up and others is either proved wrong or incomplete. You generally believe what is latest.

The ability to predict the trajectory of an object comes from Newtonian physics. You analogy is similar to, if i'm good in Chemistry, then i should be good in aerospace mechanics too?

And being a researcher, most of my experimental work is preceded by hours of theoretical work and simulation, We do not predict, we analyse the data, and change the parameters to yield desired outcome, and replicate it in experimental processes. And since last decade, the big bang theory didn't had any experimental data to back up it's claim, but a lot has been done in the past decade to prove it.

And your 'claim' is not a theory. A theory is an observation, and recorded as a repeatable and quantifiable data.
 
. .
Nagraj chutiya tha, chutiya hai, aur chutiya rahega. :chilli:

Look at the dude's girlfriend:p:

1331583-visarpi.jpg
 
.
And your 'claim' is not a theory. A theory is an observation, and recorded as a repeatable and quantifiable data.
Theory is the plausible explanation of a phenomena. Theory becomes as fact when it is proven through experiments.

Leaves are green - this is a phenomena.
Why they are green? Because they have something green that help with plant growth - this is theory.
The green matter helps with converting sun light into energy, which is used by the plant for growth - this is fact.
 
.
The ability to predict the trajectory of an object comes from Newtonian physics. You analogy is similar to, if i'm good in Chemistry, then i should be good in aerospace mechanics too?

And being a researcher, most of my experimental work is preceded by hours of theoretical work and simulation, We do not predict, we analyse the data, and change the parameters to yield desired outcome, and replicate it in experimental processes. And since last decade, the big bang theory didn't had any experimental data to back up it's claim, but a lot has been done in the past decade to prove it.

And your 'claim' is not a theory. A theory is an observation, and recorded as a repeatable and quantifiable data.


Yes that ability to predict come from Physics but not only that. Had that been a case than it will not be a prediction and others too have succeeded in first attempt because law of physics is known to every one. So there was certainly an element which is beyond the known physics which you can simply predict and element of uncertainty is always remain there.

Here the question is that I never claimed that It is a theory. Had I claimed that, I would not have used word believe. Like the physics and other pure science, the theories of social science and some other areas such as the topic under the discussion can not be simulated on computer or judge by applying the mathematical models. And so far as your example of chemistry and maths, If somebody is vary good in chemistry (Which I know), claims that he is very good in Maths as well (Which I do not know) than I would like to believe him rather not believing him because I do not have a proof to prove that he is good in maths.

It is all a meter of Judgement. Being a science student, What you are thinking is perfectly OK. You think the way you are trained.
 
. . . . . . . . . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom