What's new

Amnesty International on Kulbushan Jadhav: Pakistan military court violates international standards

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have posted the picture of the only Irani document he had now accept it or not he will be hanged. So stop crying and get a life. The Indian Gov has no balls to save their own agent why are you putting out your frustration on Pakistan. Go and protest in front of Modi.

Oh how the cowards scurry from battle..
What was all this bravado for then? LOL

Boy he was caught with an Irani passport not Indian. Pakistan and Iran have a treaty of executing Baloch terrorists and Jadhav falls under that treaty. If Iran catches a Baloch terrorist trying to disrupt Irani interests Iran can do what ever Iran wants with him and If Pakistan catches a Irani Baloch terrorist Pakistan can do what ever Pakistan wants. Jadhav is a Baloch terrorist from the Irani side of the border and Pakistan can hang him without any restriction. Call the Irani ambassador to India and protest in front of him not on PDF.

What you should be worried about is the U turn your politicians and army are contemplating as we speak. I will be here to shove egg on your face! Watch this space!

and where does that article says that field court martial is not a proper court? infact it was a norm in world war 2 and nearly all subsequent wars... this is how spies are dealt with

"Article 30 is extended thus:The Convention contains several provisions in this respect which extend the principle and make it precise. Thus Article 3 prohibits "the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples".Article 3 although it applies only to armed conflicts not of an international character, contains rules of absolutely general application. The prohibition mentioned is, moreover, confirmed by Article 5 and Articles 64-76.It should also be noted that paragraph 2 of Article 68
authorizes the Occupying Power under certain conditions to inflict the death penalty on protected persons found guilty of espionage."


Please learn to read. The article above describes precisely (see the use of the word in the above highlighted).
Where are the "regualarly constituted courts"? Where is judicial guarantee? Who was even defending Jadhav in court?
So what it doesn't give you is an option outside of this manner of dealing with spies. Field court martial is not an option.
Why don't you show me where a secret military court ruling and exceptions to it in the Geneva convention are mentioned? I'm all ears.
 
.
Oh how the cowards scurry from battle..
What was all this bravado for then? LOL

What you should be worried about is the U turn your politicians and army are contemplating as we speak. I will be here to shove egg on your face! Watch this space!
He was caught with Irani Passport now come and get him if he is your. We are not hiding him any where. If RAW is so good RAW should attempt to rescue him. RAW is just a baby for ISI and RAW should not mess with big boys.

Kulbhushan_Yadav_RAW.jpg
 
.
Thus Article 3 prohibits "the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court


so field court martial is done in a regularly constituted military court

what's the issue??.... either I am blind or some one else is

there is no requirement for open civilian court
 
.
so field court martial is done in a regularly constituted military court

what's the issue??.... either I am blind or some one else is

there is no requirement for open civilian court

YES there is! that's exactly what Geneva convention states PRECISELY!
you're being obtuse and I'm starting to think this is not on purpose!

Fine, since you claim this is a legal trial, at least give us the name of the attorney that was defending Jadhav?
A public hearing should have this information openly available. Military or civilian. If not, its not providing "judicial guarantees" to the defendant. So Let's hear it!
 
.
Fine, since you claim this is a legal trial, at least give us the name of the attorney that was defending Jadhav?
A public hearing should have this information openly available. Military or civilian. If not, its not providing "judicial guarantees" to the defendant. So Let's hear it!
Tell your Gov to contact Pakistan and ask the name okay.
 
. . .
Tell your Gov to contact Pakistan and ask the name okay.

I thought you said it was open trial and any Pakistani can watch this trial first hand? So all this info should be available to all media and people of Pakistan, no?!
India was not even given consular access! Now you want us to get trial details from a road blocking Pakistani govt?
Very convenient!

@Mrc
So basically you guys are all hot air and BS. Why don't you guys just step back and stick to false bravado instead of getting into the actual legality of this? Both you and that Bharwa guy
 
.
Hang him till death ...
 
.
I would like to invite some international folks as well as some distinguished members to the discussion:

@Joe Shearer @gambit @Vergennes @Penguin @soloman2
Can you please tell me for whom do you people require the attorney name.

I thought you said it was open trial and any Pakistani can watch this trial first hand? So all this info should be available to all media and people of Pakistan, no?!
India was not even given consular access! Now you want us to get trial details from a road blocking Pakistani govt?
Very convenient!
Yes why not. Is Modi Gov too much isolated diplomatically. Like as India said that the Jadhave was abducted India should contact the country he was abducted from about his citizen. India should use the official channel, Why should we Pakistani make it easy for Indians.

And here is his India Passport.
l_110031_095502_print.jpg
 
.
So basically you guys are all hot air and BS. Why don't you guys just step back and stick to false bravado instead of getting into the actual legality of this? Both you and that Bharwa guy

by looks of things.... you are ready to take up the appeal your self.....:cheers:

now read what you have written and apply to your self
 
.
So basically you guys are all hot air and BS. Why don't you guys just step back and stick to false bravado instead of getting into the actual legality of this? Both you and that Bharwa guy
If you guys want to defend him please tell the name of the attorney you people want for Jadhav and I will make sure he get that attorney but there is one problem now you want attorney for Jadhav or the Hussain Mubarak dude?

Look Lady Pakistan is going to hand an Irani citizen Kulbushan Jadhav but we have no info where the Indian citizen Hussain Mubarak is.

:D
 
.
Can you please tell me for whom do you people require the attorney name.

To prove that this trial is a sham and against the Geneva convention.
At least have the guts to admit that you're hanging this guy because of your enemity to India and NOT some legal "irrefutable" evidence you have against him. LOL!

Yes why not. Is Modi Gov too much isolated diplomatically. Like as India said that the Jadhave was abducted India should contact the country he was abducted from about his citizen. India should use the official channel, Why should we Pakistani make it easy for Indians.

And here is his India Passport.
l_110031_095502_print.jpg

So now you're reduced to giving us information we already know?!
So we should just dream up the information on this trial instead of asking the country that conducted the trial in secrecy without giving the defendant his due rights to defend himself?! Do you ever read what you write?
You're embarrassing yourself and other sane Pakistanis at this point.
 
.
@Peshwa g...

ask your govt to make a complaint in UNSC under Geneva convention.... if you think we are in violation
 
.
by looks of things.... you are ready to take up the appeal your self.....:cheers:

now read what you have written and apply to your self

It doesn't take a genius to read and interpret the simple guidelines to a trial as provided by the Geneva convention.
Clearly you're not a genius, but it seems expecting logic from you is also a gargantuan task.

@Peshwa g...

ask your govt to make a complaint in UNSC under Geneva convention.... if you think we are in violation

For that you would actually have to hang him first. Let's see if your country has the pebbles for it.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom