x_man
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2007
- Messages
- 1,012
- Reaction score
- 1
Runway Intersections and Junctions
During the Arab-Israeli 1967 war and even later the planning was done to hit the "Intersection point" of two runways. If the pilot delivers his bombs accurately, he puts out of action both the runways.
If runways are builts like runway 27 and runway 18, they are likely to cross each other if not far enough, making a point of intersection. This junction of both runways is bombed during war to disable both runways.
Here we need to see that how many of PAF base runways actually have these intersection points and if bombed then how much it shall reduce the operational capability of the base. This study can even be done on google earth.
For example, as seen from google, the runway 14 and 24 at sargodha are making intersections but
the runway layout of masroor seems to be good enough, with runways 27 and 22 not making intersections.
PAF should study these runway junctions and in my opinion should try to make one runway completely independent of the other, if not so already.
For any airfield strike mission, the runway intersections are definitely the most important and lucrative and a Direct Hit (DH) on an intersection can fetch you good marks in mock exercises .As seen by below Google Earth pic , Sargodha has a main runway ( 14/32) , a parallel runway and a secondary runway ( 06/24) ..and even if two surfaces are damaged , operations can still be carried out .
There are also many other airfields just around Sargodha .just try to find few in the below pic .look for the plus or cross signs .you should atleast be able to pick 3 in this pic
The other airfield with good number of surfaces available is Masroor, Karachi
Considering todays scenario, airfields are one of the most heavily defended VPs .they have outer and inner protection rings and sometimes outer, middle and inner rings ..to penetrate safely thru the net of defences , drop your load exactly where you want to and then have a safe exit from defences and enemys CAPs etc , is not a walk in the park ..Also consider that with these cutting edge Rapid runway repair (RRR) equipment , any damage can be repaired in few hours ..I remember attending few demonstrations by these RRR guys , and the way they filled a Durandal hit patch was amazing and makes you think as a pilot that What the hell , why even bother so much with hitting a runway if these guys RRR guys are there ..
In Indo / Pak scenario, any airfield strike will comprise good number of aircrafts and as I mentioned earlier that airfields are very heavily defended , so there is a good chance that you are bound to have some attrition until and unless enemy is tipsy or sleeping ..So in the end of a airfield strike, if I have lost my 3 aircrafts and three pilots and the runway that they hit is up and running again ( courtesy of RRR guys) after few hours, it will make me think if all that effort and attrition was worth it ?
Sometimes its do and die situation and you might need to neutralise an airfield for few hours in order to achieve some bigger objective elsewhere and you even dont mind few losses , I would say go ahead with the strike .BUT just striking an airfield for the heck of it Not a very good idea