Afridi Lala Opens a restaurant by the name of splice

[Areesh]

He's saying that the capital should've been invested in FATA, not Lahore.

Opening a restaurant in FATA? IS that even possible right now?

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

Opening a restaurant in FATA? IS that even possible right now?

Notice how I said "capital". A restuarant is not the only venture. But the issue isn't timing -- it's a general issue -- if people like Afridi had invested in FATA say a decade ago, we would not have such of a problem there as we have now.

 

[Areesh]

Notice how I said "capital". A restuarant is not the only venture. But the issue isn't timing -- it's a general issue -- if people like Afridi had invested in FATA say a decade ago, we would not have such of a problem there as we have now.

Afridi is opening a restaurant for earning money. Not for welfare. It is the responsibility of the govt that you want Afridi to perform.

 

[forcetrip]

Karachi is not protecting his investment so he moves his money to Lahore. I still do not understand which Local community protection you meant.. You mean to say he should only invest and sink in Karachi?

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

Afridi is opening a restaurant for earning money. Not for welfare. It is the responsibility of the govt that you want Afridi to perform.

There's a difference between welfare and conducting one's business morally.

 

[Areesh]

There's a difference between welfare and conducting one's business morally.

And what morality Afridi actually violated?

 

[Kashmiri Nationalist]

And what morality Afridi actually violated?

The fact that he chose to run a business completely for profit, rather than trying to benifit the people of his own improvished area at the same time. It seems you haven't been able to get the hint: this isn't an ad hominem against Afridi, it's a general point.

 

[Areesh]

The fact that he chose to run a business completely for profit, rather than trying to benifit the people of his own improvished area at the same time. It seems you haven't been able to get the hint: this isn't an ad hominem against Afridi, it's a general point.

He should benefit people of his impoverished area. Yes.

But it isn't compulsory and nothing wrong if he doesn't.

 

[Jango]

He's saying that the capital should've been invested in FATA, not Lahore.

It's his money, his problem.

He wouldn't open a posh restaurant in FATA now would he?

Dont get me wrong, the guy is from FATA, lived in Karachi and invested in Lahore?

Seriously !!

there should be some restrictions, Lahore is already an example of mismanagement like Karachi, upon this a nonsense cricket Dushebag certified chawal shahid afridi is getting a restaurant here in Lahore !!

As long as he does not violate laws, or encroaches upon others' rights, it's his decision.

If he wants to live in FATA, Karachi or Khuzdar, if he wants to open a restaurant in Lahore, Karachi or Toba Tek singh.

Notice how I said "capital". A restuarant is not the only venture. But the issue isn't timing -- it's a general issue -- if people like Afridi had invested in FATA say a decade ago, we would not have such of a problem there as we have now.

Had the government invested in FATA, we wouldn't have this situation now. Had I invested in FATA, we wouldn't be having a problem. Had you invested in FATA, we wouldn't have a problem.

Getting the point?

Why would he be morally or socially obligated to invest in FATA rather than Lahore?

 

[Jango]

The fact that he chose to run a business completely for profit, rather than trying to benifit the people of his own improvished area at the same time. It seems you haven't been able to get the hint: this isn't an ad hominem against Afridi, it's a general point.

Which are do you belong to in Kashmir?

P.S...this isn't anything personal, just trying to get the point across.

 

[Leader]

Karachi is not protecting his investment so he moves his money to Lahore. I still do not understand which Local community protection you meant.. You mean to say he should only invest and sink in Karachi?

No yar, there are many way to restrict economic mobility.

this type of economic mobility can be restricted by introducing joint ventures instead of PLC or sole proprietorship, if investor of one region is interested in investing in other region.

so that economic balance is not disturbed and the local community is also feel protected !!

this is macro management of a country.

 

[Leader]

There's a difference between welfare and conducting one's business morally.

you can present it in a better way, say I am investor from Lahore, and I want to invest in Nelaam Valley, should I be allowed to buy property, bring my own construction team, set up my own management team and employees and earn money and take it back to Lahore without giving back anything to the local community and locality???

the answer is NO. there should be local community protection laws.
@nuclearpak

 

[Safriz]

local community protection laws should be introduced before its too late and Lahore becomes another Karachi !

P.S. again dont get me wrong please.

I love Karachi as much as I love any part of Pakistan

he must have got himself a local partner...thats for sure.

 

[Leader]

he must have got himself a local partner...thats for sure.

thank you for realizing my point.. however it should be by law !

he must have got himself a local partner...thats for sure.

thank you for realizing my point.. however it should be by law !

 

[Safriz]

thank you for realizing my point.. however it should be by law !



thank you for realizing my point.. however it should be by law !

I dont think such restrictions for citizens of the same country exist anywhere else in the world....
In fact mixing should be encouraged by making it easier for people of one part of the country to move and work or open business in another part of the country...
right now we keep stuck in our little corners and that's why we have such racist bigoted mentality about each other...all ethnicities included.