S-A-B-E-R->
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- 0
hey nice work by thread starter ,but ill say if u r asking for a discussion dont give ur openion as u did in naming the thread it ll get some ppl go mad and in the end another discussion failure .any way the main objective is to deliver ordinances to the adversary and i think both countries are more than capable of doing that with newer tech and missles developing rapidley in both countries ..also i dont think that range is not a criteria to judge which missle is better because aprox 3000km range is enough for both countries to destroy each other also we have to keep in mind the babur raad and brahmos the real game changers in a war these weapons are tactical superiority in a conventional war against ships, SAMs radars, bunkers, silos ,missle transporters ,etc etc and a heigh no of these on both sides ll be a good determinant on both borders ...the bigger missles are end war objects massive destruction no tension kinda thing and in that bot countrys r well armed so ill say we r evenly matched in them too basically SAM is a prob for pakistan as of now we have MBDA and chinese sys and some other too but indeginous one is anza only also our ABM is no where too b seen bt remember there r thousand determinants even after counting out Airforce army and navy and fighting only with missles so i say evenly matched but there is a huge space for advancement on both sides.