A shaky, trembling dragon

[prototype]

Don't even talk about Harijans. They themselves reject that name as a cruel joke and prefer Dalit.

hahahaha,what a shallow defense,do u have any link now that Gandhiji introduced the word harijan,why deviating from the issue,dont u have any more stupid articles to presentmeanwhile I consider the word dalit also as a cruel joke,according to me their should not be a word called dalit,

 

[LaBong]

Yet you guys make fun of us when you are worse off. So who is more impudent here.

Where did an Indian guy claim that Indians are less likely to fraud scientific papers than Chinese?

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Where did an Indian guy claim that Indians are less likely to fraud scientific papers than Chinese?

Have you been to Defence forum India yet?

 

[Jackdaws]

Let's get back to the topic at hand. I doubt China is as jittery as the world press makes it out to be. It is simply too big of a nation (size wise) to swept away by a revolution and there are a lot of ethnic differences as well. What might be seen as a revolution in Tibet can be seen as an act of civil war in Manchuria.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Let's get back to the topic at hand. I doubt China is as jittery as the world press makes it out to be. It is simply to big of a nation (size wise) to swept away by a revolution and there are a lot of ethnic differences as well. What might be seen as a revolution in Tibet can be seen as an act of civil war in Manchuria.

We have had countless revolutions. Swept away and then replaced with another government.

 

[prototype]

Have you been to Defence forum India yet?

i can visit multiple forum's around the world and bring hundreds of hgly biased and derogatory statements about Chinese and china,but the does not reflect the POV of the netizens present here,claim something about defense.pk not Indian defense.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

i can visit multiple forum's around the world and bring hundreds of hgly biased and derogatory statements about Chinese and china,but the does not reflect the POV of the netizens present here,claim something about defense.pk not Indian defense.

He asked and I answered. I'm sure I can dig up something in this forum as well if you really want it.

 

[Jackdaws]

We have had countless revolutions.

Yes, in history you have but you are doing well economically. While the foot soldiers of revolutions are generally from the lower classes of society - the generals who lead revolution are from the middle class and the middle class of China is quite satisfied at the moment.

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

Look, I can't talk about small exceptions because they will exist in a nation of 1.3 billion. By selectively filtering news you can make any viewpoint in the world seem valid. You have also not understood this:

1.) demolitions of legally occupied property can proceed when the government decides fit, but compensation is to be paid.
2.) demolitions of illegally occupied land will not be compensated.

You have not refuted my point. They were even talking about compensation deduction in the article.

On censorship: 80% of Chinese people know no English at all. Of the 20% remaining, it is questionable how many have a working knowledge of English. There is no need to block most English websites.

I'm not getting your convoluted statement. I have distorted no facts, but instead you have selectively filtered news in order to advance your biased viewpoint. It is no surprise then that India has the highest rates of academic fraud in the world.

<i>Rates</i> of Scientific Fraud Retractions - Deep Thoughts and Silliness Blog | Nature Publishing Group

One cannot help but feel that you feel it convenient to pass uncomfortable issues as isolated cases and 'small exceptions'. More so because you do not provide any source to prove the contentions of my posts otherwise.

I dare say there was any filtering of anything. it is a direct report from China, if China,org is Chinese.

Yes, the article did mention the compensation. A 100 year old hutong for such a ridiculous rate! I presume you feel it is a fair compensation,

If there was no requirement to block the English site, then I presume they were not blocked during the so called Jasmine Revolution e mails and blogs or when the issue of Liu Xiaobo arose or when the Tibet Uprising was underway.

since you are at the issue of frauds, let us have a look at this:

Top 10 Copycat cars « Gems Sty

Do be good enough to have a look at the link. It is wonderful how close copies can be made.

I would most respectfully add that I have no bias as such, my post was in response to the jingoism with a touch of arrogance of your first post on the subject that prompted me to respond to clear the air and present the facts as observed by the international and Chinese media.

My personal opinion is immaterial.

BTW your link indicates:

Country Error Fraud Unknown Total Publications
USA 169 84 7 1819543
China 60 20 9 185786
Japan 41 18 1 377976
India 27 17 6 95718
UK 36 7 2 350760
S Korea 27 8 3 90052
Germany 22 3 0 294164
Australia 13 3 1 131826
Canada 15 2 0 194777
Italy 11 6 0 201922
Turkey 13 2 0 72615
France 12 1 0 181318
Greece 10 0 2 37094
Iran 9 1 1 19696

I find China higher in frauds and you claim it is India!

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

A bit conceited if you think everything you say is true and everyone is a lier.

I have not said so.

I have merely stated

I dare to be true: nothing can need a lie.

I might add that the truth is the most valuable thing we have, so I try to conserve it.

Therefore, seek within and you will have the answer.

It is also important that many forget that a lie may take care of the present, but it has no future.

Maybe one could observe the posts and realise.

if you are meaning the last line, I sure would embrace whole heartedly any errors where you find me at fault and the others perfect!

 

[below_freezing]

The line for Greece is because it didn't have any errors (the point estimate is -&#8734; and the estimated standard errors are pretty big too): that can be ignored. We can see that the US has a slightly higher estimated rate of retraction due to fraud, which corresponds to about 30% more fraud per paper than average. But China and India have higher rates of retraction due to fraud than the US (and p-value fans will be happy to know that they are both statistically significance, with lots of stars to make you happy). China has about 3 times as many fraud retractions per paper as average, and India 5 times as many.

http://blogs.nature.com/boboh/2010/11/17/rates-of-scientific-fraud

 

[KS]

Have you been to Defence forum India yet?

Are we in it ?

 

[Tiki Tam Tam]

Go by the numbers.

The lines and the commentary does not substantiate the numbers.

 

[below_freezing]

Go by the numbers.

The lines and the commentary does not substantiate the numbers.

Rate of fraud is normalized to per article rate, not absolute value. Otherwise the US is #1 in academic fraud which is true by absolute value but in terms of researcher integrity, India is the bottom of the pile.

 

[tanlixiang28776]

Are we in it ?

I am merely responding to someone else's question.