Developereo
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2009
- Messages
- 14,093
- Reaction score
- 25
- Country
- Location
The pathetic-ness is still on your part. Does a bullet have 'any electronic counter measures? do they have evasive maneuvers? do they have the ability to deploy decoys?' And it is about cost because capabilities incurs money.
Let us stretch your criticism a bit further...Keyword search 'war bullets per kill'...
We have anywhere between 50k to 100k rounds it take to actually hit a target. If we assess cost for each bullet, then it is absurd to equip each soldier or police officer with expensive body armor when the odds of getting hit is so low. And yet body armor is pretty much preferred/requested by every soldier and every police officer worldwide.
How much of a monetary value are you willing to place on training a group of Hamas fighters to clandestinely transport and build each rocket?
I know you are trying to earn your keep by stretching this argument and making it about cost as opposed to capabilities, but no dice.
The quality of a system is measured by its effectiveness against a worthy opponent. You don't sing the F22's praises because it can outperform an F-5.
Federer doesn't beat his chest about beating en elderly matron at Tennis.
Iron Dome works against antiquated 'catapulted' rockets in an environment where the adversaries are hopelessly unmatched, but how would it perform against an adversary who has something more sophisticated?
And, just so you can untie your panties in a knot, note my initial statement where I accepted that Iron Dome is a 'latest hi-tech system', so you can drop your servile appeasement on Israel's behalf.
Drop the 'THINK TANK' label. It ain't working for you.
Why such a bad mood? Did the Chinese guys spank you again and send you scurrying for cover?