What's new

63% Increase in Hajj expenses: News & Discussions

You cannot keep making boogeyman out of Muslims.

it was lal peeli masjid now hari masjid then safed masjid.

You should then change your constitution if Muslims are a Security risk to You.

i refuse to generalize them for actions of few driven by political injustice.

It is in the constitution that the state will Not deal in Interest.

we all have wishes. Lets be lawful first?
Not all Muslims are a security risk, just the ones that refuse to follow the law and disrupt & threaten the lives of other people. People in the West now know how to do protests properly - apply for a permit, the local civic authorities and law enforcement determine whether or not the proposed location is feasible for a protest depending on the estimated size of the protest and whether other people will be inconvenienced, and clear rules are laid out in terms of what the protesters can and cannot do.
 
Not all Muslims are a security risk, just the ones that refuse to follow the law and disrupt & threaten the lives of other Pakistanis. People in the West now know how to do protests properly - apply for a permit, the local civic authorities and law enforcement determine whether or not the proposed location is feasible for a protest depending on the estimated size of the protest and whether other people will be inconvenienced, and clear rules are laid out in terms of what the protesters can and cannot do.

the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan are facing terrorism charges in court. They are both Muslims and were protesting in a manner You describing.

so please atleast be consistent in approach if we have to keep an Open mind.
 
the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan are facing terrorism charges in court. They are both Muslims and were protesting in a manner You describing.

so please atleast be consistent in approach if we have to keep an Open mind.
When did the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan conduct protests in the manner of the terrorists employed by the TLYRA?
 
When did the President and Prime Minister of Pakistan conduct protests in the manner of the terrorists employed by the TLYRA?

you can follow the court proceedings.

the matter is in court. i cannot discuss
 
why do You think we are facing banktruptcy? because of our Interest based economy.

the mentioned clause makes responsible the government to facilitate Muslims in performing their religious duties. the government taxes the Muslims. They have every right to expect subsidies specially given poverty in the country

There are a lot interest based economies that are doing just fine.
Govt taxes people and takes responsibility for providing basic facilities, taxes are not to subsidise Hajj.
I am not even going into the religious argument of taking subsidy to perform Hajj.
 
the government is earning from hajj but cannot subsidize it?

in the end Saudis will give special priveleges to Pakistan otherwise Muslims are Not impressed by this governments hypocrisy

Earning from Hajj how ?

Why do we need special privileges from Saudia?
 
There are a lot interest based economies that are doing just fine.
Govt taxes people and takes responsibility for providing basic facilities, taxes are not to subsidise Hajj.
I am not even going into the religious argument of taking subsidy to perform Hajj.

we do Not have to Go into religious Argument.

bottom line is. the government earns from hajj. it should return the favor to Muslims.

Earning from Hajj how ?

Why do we need special privileges from Saudia?

why do You need them now?
 
What is there to discuss?

It's another one of blunder by the PTI government and soon they will take a U-turn on it.
 
What is there to discuss?

It's another one of blunder by the PTI government and soon they will take a U-turn on it.
From a financial standpoint it is a good move. The government should not be subsidizing unnecessary, non-productive activities. Subsidizing industry or crops or inputs into the industrial and agricultural sector makes sense but subsidizing Hajj is pointless - there is no return on investment and therefore it is just wasted taxpayer money.
 
From a financial standpoint it is a good move. The government should not be subsidizing unnecessary, non-productive activities. Subsidizing industry or crops or inputs into the industrial and agricultural sector makes sense but subsidizing Hajj is pointless - there is no return on investment and therefore it is just wasted taxpayer money.

sir do You know how economy works and how big the Annual hajj is?
 
we do Not have to Go into religious Argument.

bottom line is. the government earns from hajj. it should return the favor to Muslims.



why do You need them now?

Not sure where this bottom line of Pakistan earning from Hajj is coming for.

You suggested that we should get it from saudia. My point is still the same as to why does anyone need subsidy from anyone to perform Hajj.
 
Last edited:
the mentioned clause makes responsible the government to facilitate Muslims in performing their religious duties. the government taxes the Muslims. They have every right to expect subsidies specially given poverty in the country
Whats next subsidy for Zakat as well!
 
are You satisfied with zakaat Collection and its usage?
Mmm no. But the question is should state provide subsidy to someone who's saving is below Nisab so they can inturn pay zakat, which is a pillar of Islam just like hajj, after receiving that subsidy? More subsidy above nisab would mean more zakat!
 
Last edited:
Mmm no. But the question is should state provide subsidy to someone who's saving is below Nisab so they can inturn pay zakat, which is a pillar of Islam just like hajj, after receiving that subsidy? More subsidy above nisab would mean more zakat!

wow
 
Back
Top Bottom