27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

[CodeforFood]

Everyone knows that balakot missed their spot .(undeniable satellite images)
Everyone knows mig21 went down
And everyone knows that all its weapons are accounted for ...unfortunately he had no time to even fire

but he would still not shut-up...shameless really.

 

[Xeric]

Please use your brains to figure out why missiles from one side are more or less intact and the ones from other side are burnt. It's not rocket science.

The 4th missile (right most in your pic - Archer) was almost completely burnt as it was attached to the port side wing which buckled over the fuselage and was destroyed by flames. The same can be seen in the pics of fuselage. These thickheads wont understand that a fired missile can never be recovered in the shape as shown in the pic you have uploaded. The seeker (front part of the missile) is the first thing that gets completely destroyed on a fired missile. The rear (burnt) part is the rocket booster.

Quoting Mr Rando that warheads simply do not go missing, how does he think the warhead (located almost in the middle) went missing while the rocket (tail end) and seeker (front) are intact? i wish i could share a clearer pic of all four missile, but even that would not help in pushing any sense in their skulls, so i wont.

Here, the 4th missile's rocket can be seen

https://twitter.com/x/status/1102943251315732481

 

[Slides]

It's impossible to get through to Indians. They have been fed so many lies of their own superiority and that their own government and military doesn't lie, that they will take that belief to the grave no matter what the evidence shows.

 

[Xeric]

The 4th missile (right most in your pic - Archer) was almost completely burnt as it was attached to the port side wing which buckled over the fuselage and was destroyed by flames. The same can be seen in the pics of fuselage. These thickheads wont understand that a fired missile can never be recovered in the shape as shown in the pic you have uploaded. The seeker (front part of the missile) is the first thing that gets completely destroyed on a fired missile. The rear (burnt) part is the rocket booster

May be this comparison can push some sense into them:

 

[Microsoft]

Both are Pakistani claims.

What? F-16 being shot down is Pakistani claim? This is news to me.

 

[randomradio]

May be this comparison can push some sense into them:

You will find another interesting sequence of events going around.

That of an F-16 killed by own goal, either with a Pak AAM or SAM. With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16. All they have said is an F-16 was shot down. We also do not know whose R-73 was involved, Abhinandan's or his wingman's. Maybe even that phantom MKI.

 

[CodeforFood]

You will find another interesting sequence of events going around.

That of an F-16 killed by own goal, either with a Pak AAM or SAM. With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16. All they have said is an F-16 was shot down. We also do not know whose R-73 was involved, Abhinandan's or his wingman's. Maybe even that phantom MKI.

Now he is pivoting to something else smh.

 

[Microsoft]

You will find another interesting sequence of events going around.

That of an F-16 killed by own goal, either with a Pak AAM or SAM. With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16. All they have said is an F-16 was shot down. We also do not know whose R-73 was involved, Abhinandan's or his wingman's. Maybe even that phantom MKI.

Believe it or not you are the second most delusional Indian in this thread.

 

[untitled]

With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16

 

[1Paki$tani]

A cynic


Mirages are multirole just like the F-16s

Yes but Indian uses Mig-21 for intercepts and SU-30

May be this comparison can push some sense into them:

Not only that but when the plane was shot down the missile could have hit the side where MIG-21 Missiles are damaged. The explosion from AAM and than crash and fire would have somewhat destroyed the missiles.

 

[ziaulislam]

It's impossible to get through to Indians. They have been fed so many lies of their own superiority and that their own government and military doesn't lie, that they will take that belief to the grave no matter what the evidence shows.

Mr Gupta of the print was saying that Pakistani rebuild the building overnight within first week and used ed holographics to fake satlite images ..i mean there has to be limit of idiocy ...i never thought one can fall to such a level but this has changed my opinion ..now Pakistani rumours are making more sense as i realize anything from india side is stupid

You will find another interesting sequence of events going around.

That of an F-16 killed by own goal, either with a Pak AAM or SAM. With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16. All they have said is an F-16 was shot down. We also do not know whose R-73 was involved, Abhinandan's or his wingman's. Maybe even that phantom MKI.

Atlessr make up your mind..
There is no clarity of what happened from indian side even after 40 days
You guys hit balakot? Yes or no? Causalities yes no??
You guys shot your own mi17? Yes? No??

You guys shot f16? Yes no? Who?..like God!

You cant make up your mind after 40 days and complain about ISPR retraction of two pilots to one within time frame of 2 hours

 

[SQ8]

May be this comparison can push some sense into them:

Mehwish Hayat has greater chances of giving away her award to Meera.

 

[TsAr]

You will find another interesting sequence of events going around.

That of an F-16 killed by own goal, either with a Pak AAM or SAM. With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16. All they have said is an F-16 was shot down. We also do not know whose R-73 was involved, Abhinandan's or his wingman's. Maybe even that phantom MKI.

So now you are not certain that who shot the F-16 even though your gift says it was abhinandan. Kindly clear your head first, make up your mind and then post.

 

[GumNaam]

You will find another interesting sequence of events going around.

That of an F-16 killed by own goal, either with a Pak AAM or SAM. With the lack of official news from the IAF, in open source we have no idea what actually killed the F-16. All they have said is an F-16 was shot down. We also do not know whose R-73 was involved, Abhinandan's or his wingman's. Maybe even that phantom MKI.

it was the secret tie fighter piloted by none other than modi himself that he borrowed from darth vader that shot the F16 down, that's why there is no debri, no wreckage, no aam or sam missile parts, nothing, it was simply..."vaporized vedic style" and took sha shaza zasha zuddin khanna, khan with it...happy?! chal ja bhag ja shabbash!

 

[Riz]

Multiple AMRAAMs missed the MKIs.

Listen u dumbu.. If this story is true your one mig 21 can kill a F-16 and your mki can dodged a half dozen AMRAAMs with the speed of Mach 6, then why modi need to say that if we had Rafale's situation will be in favor of india... And there was no reason for u to cry in front of USA about Amraams & the use of F-16... dimag sa socho