randomradio
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2016
- Messages
- 6,974
- Reaction score
- -17
- Country
- Location
F-16 claim has been denied. Has the SU-30 claim been denied yet?
Both are Pakistani claims.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
F-16 claim has been denied. Has the SU-30 claim been denied yet?
So ?? U think IAF will accept our SU-30 is shot down by a JF-17 ?? What was the reason behind randi rona of modi and yiur IAF ... If we had rafale pak will never dare to attack us... This means u totally failed... TotallyBoth are Pakistani claims.
So ?? U think IAF will accept our SU-30 is shot down by a JF-17 ?? What was the reason behind randi rona of modi and yiur IAF ... If we had rafale pak will never dare to attack us... This means u totally failed... Totally
40Km is with in PL-12 range.The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.
Our AMRAAMs range is plus 100nm...The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.
4 Su-30s were in the air to intercept Paf Jets and your Media first accepted that One of Our Su-30 who was chasing F-16 along the Line of Control was shot down.The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.
New Recruit
Both are Pakistani claims.
40Km is with in PL-12 range.
Our AMRAAMs range is plus 100nm...
4 Su-30s were in the air to intercept Paf Jets and your Media first accepted that One of Our Su-30 who was chasing F-16 along the Line of Control was shot down.
View attachment 550933
We provide proofs of our claims. India said initially all planes accounted for. We showed Abhinandan.
You said Abhinandan shot an F16. See the image of all four Air to Air missiles of Abhi plane.
As they say in Punjabi
Hund aaaraaam aey ?
Lets just complete your full (weird) theory that you have cooked so that some knowledgeable member can provide a response to shut you up... oh I forgot... it is not possible to shut you off is it :-\Not used against IAF.
Multiple AMRAAMs missed the MKIs.
None of the 4 MKI came to within 40Km of the LoC. Only Mig-21s came close to LoC, and only 1 crossed.
The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.
What is the proof for that??The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.
New Recruit
The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.
Belongs to burnt wing..discussed to death how denotation works in r 73 thus burned warhead didnt detonated..also images of crash site of mig22 shows the r73 present immediately when pictures were aired ..Not used against IAF.
Multiple AMRAAMs missed the MKIs.
None of the 4 MKI came to within 40Km of the LoC. Only Mig-21s came close to LoC, and only 1 crossed.
The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.
Belongs to burnt wing..discussed to death how denotation works in r 73 thus burned warhead didnt detonated..also images of crash site of mig22 shows the r73 present immediately when pictures were aired ..
Please read my post again...we cant answer to every indians...Oscar discussed this beforeOne would like to see the other burnt up parts as well. But, by quirk of circumstances, parts of missiles that are actually found after they are expended have been displayed, while the parts that make the kill are not. Weird, don't you think?
First show the proof so the basis can be established. Don't build castles in the air.One would like to see the other burnt up parts as well. But, by quirk of circumstances, parts of missiles that are actually found after they are expended have been displayed, while the parts that make the kill are not. Weird, don't you think?