27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

[randomradio]

F-16 claim has been denied. Has the SU-30 claim been denied yet?

Both are Pakistani claims.

 

[Riz]

Both are Pakistani claims.

So ?? U think IAF will accept our SU-30 is shot down by a JF-17 ?? What was the reason behind randi rona of modi and yiur IAF ... If we had rafale pak will never dare to attack us... This means u totally failed... Totally

 

[randomradio]

So ?? U think IAF will accept our SU-30 is shot down by a JF-17 ?? What was the reason behind randi rona of modi and yiur IAF ... If we had rafale pak will never dare to attack us... This means u totally failed... Totally

The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.

40Km is with in PL-12 range.

 

[Riz]

The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.

Our AMRAAMs range is plus 100nm...

 

[usman012]

The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.

4 Su-30s were in the air to intercept Paf Jets and your Media first accepted that One of Our Su-30 who was chasing F-16 along the Line of Control was shot down.

 

[syedmunib]

Both are Pakistani claims.

We provide proofs of our claims. India said initially all planes accounted for. We showed Abhinandan.

You said Abhinandan shot an F16. See the image of all four Air to Air missiles of Abhi plane.

As they say in Punjabi

Hund aaaraaam aey ?

 

[randomradio]

40Km is with in PL-12 range.

Not used against IAF.

Our AMRAAMs range is plus 100nm...

Multiple AMRAAMs missed the MKIs.

4 Su-30s were in the air to intercept Paf Jets and your Media first accepted that One of Our Su-30 who was chasing F-16 along the Line of Control was shot down.

None of the 4 MKI came to within 40Km of the LoC. Only Mig-21s came close to LoC, and only 1 crossed.

View attachment 550933
We provide proofs of our claims. India said initially all planes accounted for. We showed Abhinandan.

You said Abhinandan shot an F16. See the image of all four Air to Air missiles of Abhi plane.

As they say in Punjabi

Hund aaaraaam aey ?

The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.

 

[CodeforFood]

Not used against IAF.



Multiple AMRAAMs missed the MKIs.



None of the 4 MKI came to within 40Km of the LoC. Only Mig-21s came close to LoC, and only 1 crossed.



The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.

Lets just complete your full (weird) theory that you have cooked so that some knowledgeable member can provide a response to shut you up... oh I forgot... it is not possible to shut you off is it :-\

The Su-30s were more than 40Km away from the LoC. Only 2 MIg-21s were present in the fight.

What is the proof for that??

Also pakistani claims atleast 50% proven correct and accepted. There isn't anything provided by the Indian side that is actually concrete proof. Accept it.. you lost this engagement and just move on.

 

[syedmunib]

The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.

Please use your brains to figure out why missiles from one side are more or less intact and the ones from other side are burnt. It's not rocket science.

 

[ziaulislam]

Not used against IAF.



Multiple AMRAAMs missed the MKIs.



None of the 4 MKI came to within 40Km of the LoC. Only Mig-21s came close to LoC, and only 1 crossed.



The 4th missile, R-73, is missing its warhead. Warheads simply do not go missing.

Belongs to burnt wing..discussed to death how denotation works in r 73 thus burned warhead didnt detonated..also images of crash site of mig22 shows the r73 present immediately when pictures were aired ..

 

[randomradio]

Belongs to burnt wing..discussed to death how denotation works in r 73 thus burned warhead didnt detonated..also images of crash site of mig22 shows the r73 present immediately when pictures were aired ..

One would like to see the other burnt up parts as well. But, by quirk of circumstances, parts of missiles that are actually found after they are expended have been displayed, while the parts that make the kill are not. Weird, don't you think?

 

[ziaulislam]

One would like to see the other burnt up parts as well. But, by quirk of circumstances, parts of missiles that are actually found after they are expended have been displayed, while the parts that make the kill are not. Weird, don't you think?

Please read my post again...we cant answer to every indians...Oscar discussed this before

 

[CodeforFood]

One would like to see the other burnt up parts as well. But, by quirk of circumstances, parts of missiles that are actually found after they are expended have been displayed, while the parts that make the kill are not. Weird, don't you think?

First show the proof so the basis can be established. Don't build castles in the air.

 

[ziaulislam]

Everyone knows that balakot missed their spot .(undeniable satellite images)
Everyone knows mig21 went down
And everyone knows that all its weapons are accounted for ...unfortunately he had no time to even fire