What's new

27 Feb 19: PAF shot down two Indian aircrafts inside Pakistani airspace: DG ISPR

.
When they say 4 km you say correct. when they say Balakot you say wrong. wow

The intrusion was only 3~4 miles, and when interception was imminent, IAF jets jettisoned their payload and did the runner. its the payload which made the distance and hit some random peak.
 
. .
national command authority meeting is just a formality.i think they already give permission.you know what i mean.our retaliation must be a lesson for them.
 
.
it's not over yet.wait for retaliation.you will feel pain when you see dead bodies.
I dont know about you but yes I have pain when I see dead bodies, it is bit natural to have that human feeling until you admit you are not human and dont have pain. But in war which was imposed on us since 30 years, we have responded for the first time. and i can see the panic everywhere.
Definitely this time something has gone too right compared to last surgical strike which has caused Pakistan to rattle so much.
Lets see!! We are expecting something from you.
 
. .
Former director of ‘Sector for Air Power Studies’ Air Commodore Jamal Hussain believes the Narendra Modi-led government needed theatrics to placate the rising calls for vengeance. “By telling the people that the Pulwama attack has been avenged, the BJP has cemented its position. Modi needed an escape route; he found one in a surgical strike.”

“The Pulwama attack was carried out by Kashmiris – even their army general admitted that the material used in the bomb was local,” said Munir.

The retired army official added that the JeM narrative pushed by India is “old intelligence”. He stressed that there were no organised JeM trainee camps.

“There may be certain elements affiliated with the JeM. In the 2000s, the JeM was banished, it moved to North Waziristan and began an onslaught against the army. Masood Azhar planned an attack on former army general Pervez Musharraf as well.”
 
. . .
Today Indians need not talk about how fanboi Pakistani are understating facts and not taking truth. Pakistani with sensible head on shoulders are doing.
 
.
mere bhai can every intrusion attempt could be stop ....??? no .... be practical its the response which matter If PAF intercept the intrusion which they did within few km and few minutes and deny IAF their targets its a success of PAF not the other way around don't fall prey of Indian propaganda

Its real life not a video game .....

Wasn't it the purpose of IAF, to intrude little bit in Pak Airspace, jettison precise guided munitions and run away ? They were successful, no matter if PAF responded in timely matter or not. 4 PGM were successfully launched and exploded in Pakistan. It is not 90's or 2000's where PAF was expecting a conventional or LGB airstrike.
 
Last edited:
.
All these guys saying IAF struck inside AJK only 3-4km from LoC...if the target was that close, what's the need for airpower?

A simple 105mm field gun can hit targets that close.

ISPR needs to spin stories better. The targets were inside KP.

40-60 kms deep.
 
. .
I dont know about you but yes I have pain when I see dead bodies, it is bit natural to have that human feeling until you admit you are not human and dont have pain. But in war which was imposed on us since 30 years, we have responded for the first time. and i can see the panic everywhere.
Definitely this time something has gone too right compared to last surgical strike which has caused Pakistan to rattle so much.
Lets see!! We are expecting something from you.

you don't want to solve kashmir.you didn't say terrorism was a problem during nawaz musharraf time.you adopted this policy after mumbai attack.pakistan isn't responsible for every thing inside kashmir.you attacked us.we will attack you.what do you think your attack makes you brave? pakistan have the ability to launch multiple attacks on india.you should wait for retaliation.don't celebrate your strikes.it is just the beginning.
 

Attachments

  • Opera Snapshot_2019-02-26_201628_www.flightradar24.com.png
    Opera Snapshot_2019-02-26_201628_www.flightradar24.com.png
    449.6 KB · Views: 87
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom