1962 would have been different had IAF been in the offence: ACM

[xuxu1457]

After hearing the blabber and baloney being spewed out by the Chinese on this thread, it makes me ROFL! The problem is that little kids out here are masquerading as professional posters churning out rubbish, knowing squat about the 1962 war as well as the drubbing the PLA received at the hands of the Indian Army in 1967 at Nathula and Chola where more than 400 PLA troops were massacred and dozens of gun positions and pillboxes destroyed!

That slaughter of the PLA in 1967, needless to say, will never be divulged to a brainwashed Chinese population due to the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party so that they continue to get orgasms when they talk about 1962. But they can't talk of 1967 can they?

Then there's the Somdorongchu incident in the 1980s in Arunachal Pradesh when the Indian Chief Gen Sundarjee, warned the Chinese to get the hell out of there or face the consequences like what happened to them at Nathula. The Chinese withdrew quickly without a whimper, lock, stock, and barrel!

Do the Chinese even know about these incidents? That's the problem. They keep harping on the 1962 skirmish like a broken record with the needle stuck in the groove! Or a tape recorder in loop mode. Much water has flowed under the bridge since then. The sooner they realise it the better.

99.99% Chinese don't know about 1962 war, I knew 1962 war last year when I went to this forum, just a border conflict not a war; now I think 1962 is only a quick,small border conflict to stop Nehru's forward policy, no any influence to Chinese and China, sorry for 1962 making Indian remember so much

 

[帅的一匹]

PLA killed 800 Indian soldiers in Nathula conflict 1967.

 

[INDIC]

PLA killed 800 Indian soldiers in Nathula conflict 1967.

Any proof to your claim.

 

[AADHAAR]

99.99% Chinese don't know about 1962 war, I knew 1962 war last year when I went to this forum, just a border conflict not a war; now I think 1962 is only a quick,small border conflict to stop Nehru's forward policy, no any influence to Chinese and China, sorry for 1962 making Indian remember so much

You still don't know about 1962 "war".

Your own government version states that no border between India and China has existed since ancient times.

The term "forward policy" was coined by an India-hater Brit called Neville Chamberlain... who insisted that a India-China border did exist ... as per a British-Tibet agreement.

Neither Indian govt nor PRC govt nor Dalai Lama's Tibetan govt recognizes that border.

If no border existed, then there can't be a "forward policy".

If Indian govt, seeing Chinese troops in Tibet, didn't move to place troops in historical no-man's lands (which were historically considered part of Ladakh and NEFA), then chinese troops would have moved into India.. just like they moved into Tibet.

In fact, Chinese did move into Aksai Chin (part of Ladakh) ... and Nehru govt's action was a (toooo) late reaction.

Why did China move into Ladakh ???? and why does it continue to be in Ladakh ??? Go ask your Govt.

 

[INDIC]

After hearing the blabber and baloney being spewed out by the Chinese on this thread, it makes me ROFL! The problem is that little kids out here are masquerading as professional posters churning out rubbish, knowing squat about the 1962 war as well as the drubbing the PLA received at the hands of the Indian Army in 1967 at Nathula and Chola where more than 400 PLA troops were massacred and dozens of gun positions and pillboxes destroyed!

That slaughter of the PLA in 1967, needless to say, will never be divulged to a brainwashed Chinese population due to the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party so that they continue to get orgasms when they talk about 1962. But they can't talk of 1967 can they?

Then there's the Somdorongchu incident in the 1980s in Arunachal Pradesh when the Indian Chief Gen Sundarjee, warned the Chinese to get the hell out of there or face the consequences like what happened to them at Nathula. The Chinese withdrew quickly without a whimper, lock, stock, and barrel!

Do the Chinese even know about these incidents? That's the problem. They keep harping on the 1962 skirmish like a broken record with the needle stuck in the groove! Or a tape recorder in loop mode. Much water has flowed under the bridge since then. The sooner they realise it the better.

The detailed analysis of Chola and Nathula incident of 1967.

The Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS)

 

[Luffy 500]

This kind of winning threads by Indians proves that CHINA did some serious butt kicking in 62 so much so that Indians are still butt hurt. CHINA simply defended her legitimate territory from Hegemonist nehru who had his dirty eyes on Tibet. Indians should be rather grateful that the chinese spared the NE out of mercy which in my opinion was their biggest blunder. People of NE are still undergoing hell by the babus in Delhi.

 

[AADHAAR]

(Whatever dubious claims china have for Tibet ... China has NIL claims for Ladakh).

 

[Norboo]

After hearing the blabber and baloney being spewed out by the Chinese on this thread, it makes me ROFL! The problem is that little kids out here are masquerading as professional posters churning out rubbish, knowing squat about the 1962 war as well as the drubbing the PLA received at the hands of the Indian Army in 1967 at Nathula and Chola where more than 400 PLA troops were massacred and dozens of gun positions and pillboxes destroyed!

That slaughter of the PLA in 1967, needless to say, will never be divulged to a brainwashed Chinese population due to the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party so that they continue to get orgasms when they talk about 1962. But they can't talk of 1967 can they?

Then there's the Somdorongchu incident in the 1980s in Arunachal Pradesh when the Indian Chief Gen Sundarjee, warned the Chinese to get the hell out of there or face the consequences like what happened to them at Nathula. The Chinese withdrew quickly without a whimper, lock, stock, and barrel!

Do the Chinese even know about these incidents? That's the problem. They keep harping on the 1962 skirmish like a broken record with the needle stuck in the groove! Or a tape recorder in loop mode. Much water has flowed under the bridge since then. The sooner they realise it the better.

Spot on! Some Chinese posters are so dumb that they think that China would have used nukes against India if it had employed the air force in 1962!!

You're right! There are too many kids on the block out here who think they are the last word in strategy, tactics and the art of war! They should concentrate more on their studies to get through school first before trying their hand at understanding geostrategy, war doctrines and the complexities of mountain warfare! It's a pain trying to argue with these self styled know-alls!

 

[Secur]

They just casefired before iaf attackd them...,china casefired within two day after knowing indian airforce and united nation were alarmed...

How long was IAF going to take ? Does the enemy wait patiently for a attack that was never going to come ? Nehru instead asked for USAF to provide aircrafts as well as pilots ... The ceasefire was unilateral as far as I have learned and what does that tell you ?

If no border existed, then there can't be a "forward policy".

Then there was no aggression on China's part , perhaps ? If you are so keen to prove that no such thing as border existed ...

 

[INDIC]

Spot on! Some Chinese posters are so dumb that they think that China would have used nukes against India if it had employed the air force in 1962!!

But China conducted first nuclear test later in 1964.

 

[Secur]

The problem is that little kids out here are masquerading as professional posters churning out rubbish, knowing squat about the 1962 war as well as the drubbing the PLA received at the hands of the Indian Army in 1967 at Nathula and Chola where more than 400 PLA troops were massacred and dozens of gun positions and pillboxes destroyed!

That slaughter of the PLA in 1967, needless to say, will never be divulged to a brainwashed Chinese population due to the propaganda of the Chinese Communist Party so that they continue to get orgasms when they talk about 1962. But they can't talk of 1967 can they?

And how and when exactly did you kill some 400 PLA soldiers with dozens of gun positions and bunkers destroyed that too in a single day ?

The 1967 Sino-Indian skirmish also known as the Chola incident, was a day-long military conflict between Indian troops and members of the Chinese People's Liberation Army in Sikkim, who had infiltrated the area. The end of the battle saw the People's Liberation Army leave Sikkim.


Casualties and losses
1 killed
9 wounded [1] 4 killed [2]

The 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish was the third military conflict between the Chinese People's Liberation Army and Indian Army that occurred at Sumdorong Chu Valley, with the previous one taking place almost a quarter of a century earlier. Since 1962, India had not returned to the site of its major defeat—the Namka Chu an east-west running stream which separates the Thag La and the Hathung La ridge to its south. India's efforts to occupy Thag La was the casus belli for the October 1962 Chinese military attack on India. However, after the 1980 review, it was decided by the military strategists that it was important to defend Tawang in a future conflict.[3] The defence forces stayed through the summer and returned in winter. This procedure was followed for two years. In 1986, Indian forces found that the Chinese had preceded them and set up semi-permanent structures there.In Feb 1986 the army nominated a new chief, General K. Sundarji, who was determined to press the decisions taken by General Krishna Rao.As part of the exercise, towards the end of the year, the army landed a brigade of troops at Zimithaung, south of Hathung La using its new heavy lift Mi-26 helicopters. These forces occupied the Hathung La, across the Namka Chu from Thag La. All this alarmed the Chinese forces in the region; they responded with alacrity and moved up their forces to take up positions all along the LAC. At points near this area—Sulu La, Bum La, etc. the troops were now face to face with their Indian counterparts. This caused concerns of Sino-Indian clashes. However, the forces did not engage in combat.The result was a thaw. Indian Foreign Minister N.D. Tiwari arrived in Beijing in May 1987 en route to Pyongyang, North Korea. He carried with him messages from Indian leaders that there was no intention on New Delhi's part to aggravate the situation.

Result Both sides showed military restraint.[1][2]


But keep telling that alternate history though , your countrymen seem to love them ...

 

[xuxu1457]

why Indian always talk about 1962 again and again, even talked 100 times , has no matter with now, I don't want to waste time to know detail about a small war 50 years ago,

you talk one time and let yourself be hurt one time, but can't let Chinese feel a little, bcs 99.99% Chinese can't remember it and even can't find in history book or only several words, why under the 1962 shadow for so many years; WWII ,Korea war, VN war may make some sense on Chinese memory

 

[AADHAAR]

why Indian always talk about 1962 again and again, even talked 100 times , has no matter with now, I don't want to waste time to know detail about a small war 50 years ago,

you talk one time and let yourself be hurt one time, but can't let Chinese feel a little, bcs 99.99% Chinese can't remember it and even can't find in history book or only several words, why under the 1962 shadow for so many years; WWII ,Korea war, VN war may make some sense on Chinese memory

It's talked about because of border dispute.. not because of the 1962 "war". And anyway, sort of 50 years passed by, so those who want to talk, talk.

 

[Secur]

why Indian always talk about 1962 again and again, even talked 100 times , has no matter with now, I don't want to waste time to know detail about a small war 50 years ago,

Obsession , bro ... What else ?

These statements , reports or news from their media about a war in past come every other week

 

[AADHAAR]

Obsession , bro ... What else ?

These statements , reports or news from their media about a war in past come every other week

you read the news, what you look for.

Economic issues are more important... ask the man on the street.