Search results

Ive retired from the military you dodo if i was still in pak army then i would be taking it down.war you will never see a battle

Pakistan should at least be on par with 4500 tanks as indian army .production should be increased for ak1 untill at least we can get some chinese tanks to increase numbers.money is not an issue to say the least it is not fighter jets we are building .pakistan should look at the british...

Fence should never have been allowed to be built in the first place .pakistan should start to bomb the fence and destroy it and allow more freedom fighters to cross make infiltration easier for arms to the mujahideen.

You contradict yourself by saying pakistan had control over it at the start of your post

King of kashmir who shit himself and could not deal with a few tribal s

Nobody cares who started the war if you remain on the topic why thread was started .and nobody cares about heights and climate disadvantage s cause if they were the randians would not be sitting on top of saichin losing men to the cold when there is no war

Advantage s hardly any disadvantages more then enough which is reason why loc has hardly moved from 1948

Pakistan needs to tell tell the Saudi 5 billion we need 50 billion to not go to new block

It is not extreme altitude in poonch or rajouri as i suggested i m from that part of the world u are off your rocker if you think we would lose 150000 troops there .300000 troops were the standing army no reserves are included or paramilitaries .how would the indian troops deal with the...

In 1947 when the british left troops division was 260000 to india and 140000 to pakistan .the indian army was not 7 times larger in 1965 it was 3 to 1 .the pakistan army had better equipment and to transfer to border was closer it would not have been as doom as gloom as you point out

Eastern front punjab and sindh would be a defensive action and all our troops would not have been needed in the north 150000 troops in iok would be sufficient to have made inroads into rajouri and poonch.also operations into assam and tripura would negate any action taken by indian army.any...

Why do you think that it was not .or you dont like it cause it would be successful

All the western nations supported a communist supporting nation of india in 1965.big mistake of pakistan being in seato and cento The idea was good but not carried out well enough instead of pushing ssg troops in to help start uprising a full scale invasion in to kashmir would worked better...

More heads were collected from manipur then anywhere else

Just to remind you turkey gained territory in cyprus with a friendly regime in the north.armenia gained territory from azerbaijan just to name a couple and its not just russia and israel .

I think the first block 3 should have the azad kashmir flag as its colour for solidarity with the kashmiris

Im just wonderin When did you count them lol and why have you gone off topic of how india would invade nepal without international players coming in on pakistan side India would have surrendered in chicken neck was invaded in 1965 and would have run off to un as in 1948

You have to give pti full term in government before any judgment can be passed any sooner then you realy dont know what you are about. Corruption is a big problem in pakistan and any kind of stance to start a change is a good one and results cannot be seen in a year now

I think the idea of going through nepal would have caused more trouble for india and it would be india who would have expanded war to other countries and as a result would have bought in international players on Pakistan side rather then india it is 1965 and not 2019 India attacking nepal to go...

Lol thats the best