Search results

Yes, we are indigenous to the Crimean Peninsula. If the Natives can force them out or even want them out at this point. Crimea annexation is a fresh wound. Your logic isn't all there. The comparison is totally off.

Not everyone has to accept this narrative. Crimea is Tatar and always has been.

Yes mate. Born in England and raised in Canada.

I think both regimes fundamentally realize this. The problem is that they stir up emotional rhetoric among the masses to translate that into votes, political agendas, and financial initiatives that benefit a few. If both people could take a step back, and analyze the situation from a neutral...

Aren't you a bright specimen.

Greetings and hello to my Turk brothers and sisters. çok teşekkür ederim @T-123456 Crimean Tatar. See you around on the forum everyone. - Special Delivery

Persian was adopted by several Turkic dynasties, from what I can remember the Timurids had the most absorption because they conquered Persia proper. In the Mughal case, after marrying into the Hindu Rajput royalty, Turkic and Persian both slowly disappeared.

Thank you and amazing to meet a fellow Tatar of all places! I see my Turkic brothers have a heavy presence on this forum.

No my friend unfortunately I don't. Crimea

The following are considered Turks (Turkic): Anatolian Turks (Turkey) Uzbeks Salars (China) Uyghurs Kazakhs Kyrghyz Tatars The early founders of the Mughal Empire (after centuries of breeding with the Hindu Rajputs the Turkic lineage was weened out but many South Asians have Turkic blood in...

Wrap those towels around your heads real tight before going on your mission to free Palestine fellas! Try to convince as many Pakistanis to join your cause as well. We all know how you guys love soliciting honest Pakistanis to join your failed causes. This is the last off topic post I will make...

Hopefully they don't kidnap any Israelis then ;)

Pakistan lost its leverage within Afghanistan on a plethora of fronts. To make a case against India being involved in Afghanistan at this point is being naive and limiting yourself further. Viewing such complex issues through the India goggles is what causes these blunders to occur in the first...

I realize that as well. But Europe has been down that path. It would be better to expose and isolate the real enemy instead of pissing off a lot of people and getting nothing accomplished at the end of the day.

I was once in the shoes of those protesting whole heartedly against Islam. After many years working with various agencies, I realized that most Muslims are not only victims of the Islamists themselves, but have many security personnel making sacrifices in fighting terrorism. No Muslim country is...

It's more than "Muslim on Muslim" violence. The Ottomans were Muslims and they represented the height of civilization and diplomacy at the time and maintained alliances with Christian powers as well, while the people who were trying to establish an ultra orthodox Caliphate similar to ISIS had...

It is not related to Islam in the way that you are trying to correlate it, otherwise the Ottomans wouldn't have taken off so many Wahhabi heads in the Arabian desert in the 18th and 19th centuries.

Which ideology doesn't preach it is perfect? Just by your derogatory tone I can tell you feel that you are superior in some way. I'm not even Muslim and I can make the distinction between Islam and it's radical terrorist offshoots quite well. You have an axe to grind pal, lighten up.

Different groups have used Islam for various purposes. Some use Islam to kill, subjugate and spread chaos by twisting it to suit their needs. Others let the faith make them better moral human beings and better leaders. The latter is not happening for the past century.

It has nothing to do with Islam. The Ottomans had it isolated pretty nicely, which is why there was so much peace for so long in that region.