What's new

PAF J-10C News, Updates and Discussion

The Indian guy must be in a small subcompact. Looks horrendous cramped!
Nope, the mighty Modi ji, saviour of India, the all knowing and gracious, 56inch chest is so huge it just makes everything else small.
 
.
DGPR (AIR FORCE)
@DGPR_PAF


Today marks a very important day in the history of PAF as it inducts the state of the art J-10C aircraft in its arsenal. This addition further strengthens PAF as a formidable and potent force well capable of defending the aerial frontiers of our beloved country.
Image
View attachment 823256
11:48 AM · Mar 11, 2022
....
Asking again. Do we know what powerplant is in the one supplied to us?
 
Nope, the mighty Modi ji, saviour of India, the all knowing and gracious, 56inch chest is so huge it just makes everything else small.

Didn't realized he had a 56-inch bust.

That's bigger than Kim Kadashian's!

Asking again. Do we know what powerplant is in the one supplied to us?

WS-10B. I thought everyone knew.
 
Yep.

This is the PAF's first scalable medium-weight fighter since the F-16.

In other words, the PAF can -- and probably will -- build a large fleet of these fighters (90+). This is important because India cannot bank on political maneuvering or attrition to deplete the PAF fleet.


Yup, and just as importantly for the first time in 70 years it pretty much ends the American strangle hold on the PAF....
 
.
1647036512340.png

....
 
The Indian guy must be in a small subcompact. Looks horrendous cramped!
When you have a 56 inch chest and an ego to go with it, everything is cramped.
For those of us who were around when the first F-16s were inducted, the F-16 brand Naswaar was the hottest thing on the market for Naswaar aficionados.
 
If I am not mistaken J10 carries significant amount of fuel in the wings.. infact if I am not mistaken then amongst similar weight airctaft, it is comparatively on the higher side. Please correct me if I am wrong here.
Also, without the inner most pylons carrying fuel tanks, what would be the range solely based on internal fuel?
The reason I ask this is because unlike China, Pakistan may not need longer legs and if required then we can have the mid fuselage pylon carry a single fuel tank. This way we can use the inner most pylon for pods or may be design a different dual rack (e.g. vertical racks or dissimilar configuration) where the fuselage or the landing gear does not hamper carrying 2 missiles or a pod or any combination of missile.
Would love to hear thought or why we can't do this with J10-CP
That’s why I love J10c service in PAF, there will be more flexibility and possibility. If the fuselage or the landing gear doesn’t hamper fuel tanks, they will not hamper carrying PL15 or ALCM either.
 
Last edited:
It is called TK-31
Hi Deino so PAF getting any HMDS if yes which will be those and just a offtopic PLAAF using HMDS with J10c
Thank you

Hi any one can confirm what missiles been displayed with J10c at the induction ceremony I believe SD10 and PL8
may be
thank you
 
...
Nice art in 2021 and now we have the real one 2022.....................

1647042631109.png

...
........
 
Hi Deino so PAF getting any HMDS if yes which will be those and just a offtopic PLAAF using HMDS with J10c
Thank you

Hi any one can confirm what missiles been displayed with J10c at the induction ceremony I believe SD10 and PL8
may be
thank you

PL15E and PL10E
 
Heartily congratulations from my side to PAF and the nation, although am a bit late due to my recent shootout with mods in other words a Ban.
 
Last edited:
Mashallah congrats to PAF and to Pakistan ... deadly addition to the PAF family.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom