Zia ul Haq my grandfather

[JonAsad]

I did....... get the gist........... the thing is, whenever you're talking crap about Zia, you should be more open about it!

na man i like to see people fallin' - -

 

[zip]

Is it wise to pile up the blame of 30 yrs of ignorance to 1 man?

Lets say he started it....Shouldnt 30 yrs of ignorant governance also be blamed for not being able to undo 1 man's job? Just shows how incompetent these 30yrs of govt was and still is...

Blaming is not the way...and if it is the way blame all the way not just 1 man!

You cant travel back with a time machiene and correct those mistakes ...those are not writings on the board ...in a deep jungle you wont be having liberty to change direction ..you should be careful to choose one

 

[VCheng]

I Respect your perception, but I think it was him who brought religious values and moral values in our hollow society.

I can respect your opinion too, but all I will observe is better a hollow society than a society on fire, consuming itself. And General Zia lit the fire.

 

[Zarvan]

I can respect your opinion too, but all I will observe is better a hollow society than a society on fire, consuming itself. And General Zia lit the fire.

General Zia didn't let the fire after Afghan Jihad its successive goverments who did this and main fire came after dumbo Musharraf U turn

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

I can respect your opinion too, but all I will observe is better a hollow society than a society on fire, consuming itself. And General Zia lit the fire.

I totally agreed to @Zarvan, during ZIA reign Pakistan was going really well. There was total law and order through out country by that time. And It was Musharraf and our politicians mistakes that Pakistan is in fire right now.

 

[VCheng]

I totally agreed to @Zarvan, during ZIA reign Pakistan was going really well. There was total law and order through out country by that time. And It was Musharraf and our politicians mistakes that Pakistan is in fire right now.

They were both Generals who sold out Pakistan, just like the Generals-for-Hire are known to do. There is no difference between them, and likely many more still to come.

 

[Pakistani shaheens]

They were both Generals who sold out Pakistan, just like the Generals-for-Hire are known to do. There is no difference between them, and likely many more still to come.

No my friend, it was our politicians who sold us infront of USA and IMF etc.
and by the way Do u know how zia was assassinated? And who assassinated him?

 

[VCheng]

No my friend, it was our politicians who sold us infront of USA and IMF etc.
and by the way Do u know how zia was assassinated? And who assassinated him?

No Sir, the politicians have no real power. The Generals-for-Hire rent out Pakistan and its forces. That is why they always control foreign and defense policy so firmly.

 

[faisal6309]

The country was most stable in Zia reign. However, he is responsible for the a lot of things happening today. Bhutto was responsible too because he made Qadiyani people non-Muslim. But all religious people agreed at that time.

Bhutto and Zia situation was like today's Imran Khan and Nawaz Sharif like situation. We never learn from our mistakes.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

It is the duty of every true Pakistani to piss on the grave of Zia up Haq.

--
dont derogate the ex president of pak...
you can critise and disagree with his policy but not abuse him....

 

[pursuit of happiness]

You cant travel back with a time machiene and correct those mistakes ...those are not writings on the board ...in a deep jungle you wont be having liberty to change direction ..you should be careful to choose one

--
kya bat

 

[Jaanbaz]

A man who destroyed Pakistan. A man who swore an oath on Quran and broke his oath of holding elections. So much for mard-e-momin lol. If this is the standard of momineen for being a Muslim in Pakistan then I'm happy Ahmadis are kafirs in the eyes of corrupt Pakistanis.

 

[raza_888]

The irony

The author is arguing against democracy which is something his grandfather would not have allowed, to speak against his regime


And he is a London based student
His grand father wanted to turn Pakistan on Saudi Arabia footprint
But there's a reason this man studies in London and not Saudi Arab

 

[Zarvan]

They were both Generals who sold out Pakistan, just like the Generals-for-Hire are known to do. There is no difference between them, and likely many more still to come.

Zia never sold Pakistan he safed it he completed nuclear program he gave good time to India

 

[Zarvan]

A man who destroyed Pakistan. A man who swore an oath on Quran and broke his oath of holding elections. So much for mard-e-momin lol. If this is the standard of momineen for being a Muslim in Pakistan then I'm happy Ahmadis are kafirs in the eyes of corrupt Pakistanis.

A man who safed Pakistan a man who brought peace in Baluchistan a man who completed nuclear program you hate because he exposed you and Ahmedis are considered kafirs because they are kafirs