Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
India had decided to go for Apache.i think WZ-10 is not that good as Apache, but it is sanction free for Pakistan.
Im not a Aviation engineer, i just translate it from Chinese source Baidu.
If China can develop 1300 KW turbin shaft engine in the future, we might get a good one as Apache.
Pak Army should go for WZ 10 over T129. WZ 10 have send panic attacks to US,they & the defence experts are comparing WZ 10 with Apache.
Actually how many WZ-10 PA is gonna get for replacing AH1-F?WZ10 is the one i say china has backed us. we can get as many we want and the project is progressing fast.
I agree with you, but the question is WZ-10 is much cheaper than Apache. Paksitan could afford many of them, i think WZ-10 with HMS is somewhere middle in Apache and LCH. No offence, we should wait for WZ-10A instead of WZ-19.really? telling my toy is good but comparing wz -10 to apache is a bit too much. Even Chinese members will agree with me. Maybe in future wz-19 will be something more better. But as of now wz-10 have minimum wapon load and very heavy.
a technical question pls answer me. How can a helo weighing 5000kg(empty weight) goes up to 6400m ? While engine power is just 2*1000 kw
Actually how many WZ-10 PA is gonna get for replacing AH1-F?
ãæ客ãå®ææ*¦ç´10åé£å空ä¸*翻转âå¨çº¿æ*æ¾âä¼é ·ç½ï¼è§é¢é«æ¸ å¨çº¿è§ç
i dont know how army need but may guess is at least 50 or 60
Money is always going to be issue. But this is a tough pick. I'd say T-129 for the Army and WZ-10 for the Air Force.
WZ-10 for the Air Force
don't have money to buy for army what air force will do with it
A combination fleet with T-129 and WZ-10 is formidable.Money is always going to be issue. But this is a tough pick. I'd say T-129 for the Army and WZ-10 for the Air Force.