World’s five most powerful countries pledge to avoid war

[MH.Yang]

Britain and France have declined. Especially in the field of emerging science and technology, they lag behind South Korea and Japan, not to mention China and the USA. In some areas, they even lag behind India, such as regenerative medicine.
France, Britain and Russia are all declining countries. But Russia still has valuable resources, and France&Britain are hard to maintain. France relies on the minting rights of 14 African countries, Britain on the financial industry and Russia on resources. They are all the same.


@Beny Karachun
I know you're not convinced.
Top 10 emerging technology industries: artificial intelligence, regenerative medicine, quantum computer, autopilot, blockchain, network security, virtual reality, lithium ion battery, UAV, conductive polymer.
4 countries: China, USA, South Korea and Japan.

Does France and Britain have any of the 10 technologies that can lead any of the 4 countries?

 

[fitpOsitive]

The most likely country to start a nuclear war is Israel. Its the most wRmonhing nation on the planet

And from where Israel will arrange that nuclear thing?

 

[retaxis]

France and UK have sold out their countries and destroyed the DNA/culture of their country. Future will not look bright.

Russia and Far East retains their countries DNA and culture which means the hardworking, creative, innovative and sacrificing nature will continue for generations.

 

[Abid123]

South Korea would also beat Russia in a conflict, especially since Russia can't invade South Korea.

And Egypt would crush Israel in a war because Israel can't invade Egypt

 

[Titanium100]

Lmao at 5... Britain and France? You gotta be on some strong drugs whoever wrote this

 

[Beny Karachun]

And Egypt would crush Israel in a war because Israel can't invade Egypt

It can lol, it did so at the end of 1948, beginning of 1956, beginning of 1967 and in the end of 1973.

It just won't because it doesn't have any reason to.

 

[Abid123]

It can lol, it did so at the end of 1948, beginning of 1956, beginning of 1967 and in the end of 1973.

It just won't because it doesn't have any reason to.

Get realistic! Egypt in 2021 would crush you guys. You know it.

 

[Beny Karachun]

Get realistic! Egypt in 2021 would crush you guys. You know it.

No lol, Israeli army is a billion times stronger today than what it was just 10 years ago.
Israeli F-35Is, F15s and F16s, Merkava Mk4 Barak, Spike ATGMs, Harop drones, swarm drones etc are the pinnacle of technology.
Egyptian counter parts couldn't hope to match our weapon systems.

Israel has shown unbelievable air force and tactical brilliance in May 2021, having 150 jets in the air simultaneously precision striking Hamas tunnels using 450 bombs in less than 30 minutes.
1967 is nothing compared to that achievement.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

What about the other 3 declared nuclear powers?

 

[dBSPL]

All states in the world should have the freedom to have nuclear weapons. Or neither none of them should it be.

The current situation is not an element of balance, but a tool of hegemony.

 

[Leishangthem]

In future there will be power competition between 3 states only- China ,Japan and US. Infact many geopolitical reviews in US ranks Japan as no.1 future nemesis instead of China, Japan's huge leverage isn't understood well .The situation is often different from perception. US have what both Japan and China lacks in comparison,natural resources and convenient geography,US is brimming with oil,gas and vast swath of overproductive land ,region rife for wind and solar energy and with no competing power neaby,that is unless Argentina rises with their similar convenient geography and abundant natural resources ,but even than Argentina would be south American hegemon only .These matters in an era of uncertainly and disrupted trade.China and Japan have to co-operate for that.

 

[Titanium100]

No lol, Israeli army is a billion times stronger today than what it was just 10 years ago.
Israeli F-35Is, F15s and F16s, Merkava Mk4 Barak, Spike ATGMs, Harop drones, swarm drones etc are the pinnacle of technology.
Egyptian counter parts couldn't hope to match our weapon systems.

Israel has shown unbelievable air force and tactical brilliance in May 2021, having 150 jets in the air simultaneously precision striking Hamas tunnels using 450 bombs in less than 30 minutes.
1967 is nothing compared to that achievement.

This is one of the most delusional posts on PDF.. You have only air superiority and they can overcome that easily by grounding it which means this gives them the edge in a disportional fashion.. What are you thinking here that Israel will field the avengers as ground forces and DC superhero universe such as superman, Aquaman etc etc.. Your armed forces could be overwhelmed within weeks in a potential head on against a well drilled state actors.. You can't technically roll over Hezbollah and they are a small non state actors forget about such large state actors or even small state actors in the area..

Egypts only main threat is a large Coalition like NATO not smaller states in the area..

 

[PeaceGen]

World’s five most powerful countries pledge to avoid war

China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US have released a joint statement affirming their opposition to using their nuclear arsenals for offensive purposes. They also promised to work together on nuclear disarmament.

www.rt.com

China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US have released a joint statement affirming their opposition to using their nuclear arsenals for offensive purposes. They also promised to work together on nuclear disarmament.
“We affirm that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought,” read the statement released on Monday. “As nuclear use would have far-reaching consequences, we also affirm that nuclear weapons – for as long as they continue to exist – should serve defensive purposes, deter aggression, and prevent war.”
The five signatories said they will continue to abide by their “bilateral and multilateral non-proliferation, disarmament, and arms control agreements and commitments,” and claimed that none of their nukes are targeted at each other or any other state.
The five nuclear nations, known as the P5, are not the only countries in the world with atomic weapons. India and Pakistan both possess them, and Israel is widely believed to have a nuclear arsenal. North Korea has also tested several nuclear devices.

Monday’s statement comes at a time when relations between some of the P5 are at a historic low point. Russia and the US have long squabbled over the placement of American nukes in Europe, and with lawmakers in Washington recently accusing Moscow of planning an “invasion” of Ukraine – a claim rejected by Kremlin – some in Congress have even called for nuclear war should that invasion take place.
READ MORE: US senator ‘won’t rule out’ nuclear strike against Russia
Ahead of negotiations between NATO and Moscow, the US has not said it would remove its nukes from European soil. Ratcheting up the tension, Belarussian President Alexander Lukashenko has suggested his country could host Russian missiles in response.
Further afield, US officials have claimed that China is dramatically increasing its stockpile of nuclear arms.
While pointing to Washington's “disregard of facts,” Beijing said it has a “no first use” policy, adding that “no country will be threatened by China’s nuclear weapons.”
At the same time, last year the US, the UK, and Australia brokered a pact called AUKUS, aimed at arming the latter with nuclear-powered, yet conventionally armed, submarines. As a result, Australia unilaterally canceled its multi-billion-dollar diesel-electric submarine contract with France, which Paris said was a “stab in the back.”
You can share this story on social media:

very good news, but this does not mean we are out of the WoT + Cold-war 2 woods yet..

 

[Beny Karachun]

This is one of the most delusional posts on PDF.. You have only air superiority and they can overcome that easily by grounding it which means this gives them the edge in a disportional fashion.. What are you thinking here that Israel will field the avengers as ground forces and DC superhero universe such as superman, Aquaman etc etc.. Your armed forces could be overwhelmed within weeks in a potential head on against a well drilled state actors.. You can't technically roll over Hezbollah and they are a small non state actors forget about such large state actors or even small state actors in the area..

Egypts only main threat is a large Coalition like NATO not smaller states in the area..

Israel has technological, tactical, strategic, intelligence, experience, training, motivation, air, ground, industrial ,ballistic and nuclear superiority over all nations in this region.

Egypt along with Syria and 100,000 more Arab expeditionary troops had years to be trained by the Soviets and fully armed with superior Soviet technology in both quantity and quality, drilled the invasion for months and caught Israel in a surprise attack, all that just to loose more land than they began with, get 20 Egyptians killed for every Israeli killed and 15 Syrians killed for every Israeli killed,get 7000~ Egyptians captured, get the Egyptian 3rd army encircled and to run to the USSR to beg for them to force a cease fire just so Israel wouldn't kill tens of thousands of Egyptian encircled soldiers.

As for Hezbollah,

Who is exposed to the destruction and demolition the most?

Which two teams suffered a greater amount of dead and wounded?

Let's answer these questions and find out who will be victorious.
Hezbollah moved away from the Israeli border and became under the supervision of UNIFIL. With this, Israel achieved its goal.
Hassan Nasrallah has disappeared from public view and is now appearing behind cameras, hasn't left his bunker since 2006, in the company of his kind -moles and worms.

Lebanon was subjected to a very great devastation, while Israel did not suffer 0.001% of what Lebanon was exposed to.
The number of dead and wounded Lebanese is hundreds of times higher than what Israel was exposed to.

Israel quickly returned to its regular life and now its economy is better than most European states while Lebanon is in a political and economical crisis.
Israel had pretty much absolute calmness in the Lebanese border for 16 years now.
Israel bombs a Hezbollah weapons delivery? It's okay.
Israel kills a bunch of Hezbollah members? It's fine.
Israel kills them again? Okay, maybe that's enough, let's send an ATGM team inside Israel.
And then when Israel bombs this ATGM team into pieces as soon as it enters Israel, no response from Hezbollah.

Nasrallah himself said that if he knew that would be how Israel would react, he wouldn't have started this war.

If this is called victory for Hezbollah and Lebanon, then what is defeat?


Your and Hezbollah's definition of victory is merely surviving.
All Hezbollah needs to call itself a victor is two bearded terrorists with AK47s uploading photos to Twitter that they survived. Which is a flawed definition of victory.

Also, your stupid way of dealing with wars as if they're parts of mathematical equations is wrong. Just because a terrorist organization, that is fighting with absolutely no rules and hides behind its own people wasn't absolutely destroyed by Israel to the point they cease to exist, doesn't mean Israel will have any difficulty wiping the floor with conventional armies. No conventional army is good against terrorists that hide among their civilians, unless the same army carpet bombs the s*it out of them regardless. Which is exactly what's going to happen in the next war.

Another point I'd like to make, the US apparently lost to the Taliban because it survived according to you, does that mean the US is going to loose against Egypt because the Taliban is a
small non-state actor and Egypt is a state actor?
Did the US "lose" to the Taliban because it is weaker than the Taliban, or because it just chose to not MOAB every single city in Afghanistan which the word "Taliban" is said in?

You're a fool, Egyptian army is an unprofessional, unmotivated force that stands no chance against the IDF.

 

[Titanium100]

Israel has technological, tactical, strategic, intelligence, experience, training, motivation, air, ground, industrial ,ballistic and nuclear superiority over all nations in this region.

Egypt along with Syria and 100,000 more Arab expeditionary troops had years to be trained by the Soviets and fully armed with superior Soviet technology in both quantity and quality, drilled the invasion for months and caught Israel in a surprise attack, all that just to loose more land than they began with, get 20 Egyptians killed for every Israeli killed and 15 Syrians killed for every Israeli killed,get 7000~ Egyptians captured, get the Egyptian 3rd army encircled and to run to the USSR to beg for them to force a cease fire just so Israel wouldn't kill tens of thousands of Egyptian encircled soldiers.

As for Hezbollah,

Who is exposed to the destruction and demolition the most?

Which two teams suffered a greater amount of dead and wounded?

Let's answer these questions and find out who will be victorious.
Hezbollah moved away from the Israeli border and became under the supervision of UNIFIL. With this, Israel achieved its goal.
Hassan Nasrallah has disappeared from public view and is now appearing behind cameras, hasn't left his bunker since 2006, in the company of his kind -moles and worms.

Lebanon was subjected to a very great devastation, while Israel did not suffer 0.001% of what Lebanon was exposed to.
The number of dead and wounded Lebanese is hundreds of times higher than what Israel was exposed to.

Israel quickly returned to its regular life and now its economy is better than most European states while Lebanon is in a political and economical crisis.
If this is called victory for Hezbollah and Lebanon, then what is defeat?


Your and Hezbollah's definition of victory is merely surviving.
All Hezbollah needs to call itself a victor is two bearded terrorists with AK47s uploading photos to Twitter that they survived. Which is a flawed definition of victory.

Also, your stupid way of dealing with wars as if they're parts of mathematical equations is wrong. Just because a terrorist organization, that is fighting with absolutely no rules and hides behind its own people wasn't absolutely destroyed by Israel to the point they cease to exist, doesn't mean Israel will have any difficulty wiping the floor with conventional armies. No conventional army is good against terrorists that hide among their civilians, unless the same army carpet bombs the s*it out of them regardless. Which is exactly what's going to happen in the next war.

Another point I'd like to make, the US apparently lost to the Taliban because it survived according to you, does that mean the US is going to loose against Egypt because the Taliban is a
small non-state actor and Egypt is a state actor?
Did the US "lose" to the Taliban because it is weaker than the Taliban, or because it just chose to not MOAB every single city in Afghanistan which the word "Taliban" is said in?

You're a fool, Egyptian army is an unprofessional, unmotivated force that stands no chance against the IDF.

You came with a long essay in order to make sense of redundant conspiracy..

You have no technological edge except for air superiority and i am not being biased against you..

War is not cartoon you gotta eventually engage in the conventional spectrum that is why you got uprooted in 2006 in Lebanon by Hezbollah because they had the ability to take out your tanks and one of the reasons Israel avoided conventional after that period it would have been a blood bath casualty wise.. But Lebanon is good example because an actual engagement occured.. Such affairs are meat grinders for Israel that can't effort them..

You are talking about short conflicts that happened over half a century ago as some sort counter weight evidence..

You have been sold alot conspiracies but this definitely not how your generals view warfare as if it was from a cartoon POV...

Forget about anyone else you can't realistically rollover Hezbollah.. They have missiles, anti-tanks and all the necessary element..

I repeat you don't have technological advantage aside for air superiority and we have seen iron dome in action it failed to impress...

You don't have manpower or stragetic depth one quick incursions could be it really.. majority in the region don't view Israel as threat explaining why some have befriended them.. They have other threats to focus on