What's new

With BECA, India Will be US’ De Facto Military Ally

Pakistani forces are already there in KSA. Yes, we did not respond to kill Yemen's people nor should we.

Saudi's threat is Turkey these days...now will you fight with Saudis with Turkey?....Saudis have realised that Pakistan is running with hares and hunting with hounds at the same time... In any case, your help will not be required soon....with Israel on their side now....besides US is there too.
 
.
Saudi's threat is Turkey these days...now will you fight with Saudis with Turkey?....Saudis have realised that Pakistan is running with hares and hunting with hounds at the same time... In any case, your help will not be required soon....with Israel on their side now....besides US is there too.
No one is going to attack each other, this is only a hypothetical question. We can better bring them to a table to sort the differences out. we will never let them do that.
Now comes your hypothetical query, we should stand with the defending country.against the aggressor.it may not satiate your desire to bring them to self-destruction. this standing is to bring them back to the negotiating table. nor to harm the other.
 
. . . . .
Also the pact to hand over the entire country to them.

Just like the same way China acquired 99 year leases
I love KSA as I love my own country. why should I blame the country that has come to help every time my country needs it. India can not create any misunderstanding between KSA and Pakistan. we are brothers and friends. we may have some differences of opinions but no problems.it is normal. Pakistan is always there to defend KSA.

From time the Saudis were threatened it was America sending 500,000 troops to protect them
for starters beggars cannot be defenders
It is just part of the encirclement plan of China by hawkish right group in USA.

Unfortunately Modi lacks the wisdom, foresight and vision to resist this in view of her faltering economy and uncontrollable Covid pandemic.
Modi India is scare stiff of a Chinese invasion and that will topple his government, admit or not.
But India is losing the forest in the process, I will explain why later.

In the eyes of USA and her 5 eyes Anglo-Saxon allies, India is just another recruited pawn in this grandiose chess game between USA and China. So far China is winning.
India is meant to be used and play like a ball but never to be respected.

WTO has repealled US tariff as ILLEGAL and also allowed EU sanction against Boeing for its subsidies from US government. So Is USA going to quit WTO and WHO?

Will USA comes to the rescue of both India or Taiwan in event of an outbeak of war stoke by USA hawks.
The answer is NO.

USA does not have to defend India. They have to supply India with weapons, money and intelligence
 
.
When the "White" people ask you to sign on a piece of paper you're as good as dead.....

The top "Whites" study law and business for a reason.....
 
.
If you look at the present scenario, the countries that are a part of NATO have never been attacked from the times Soviets were in power to their downfall, to this date when Russian Federation exercises power.

Same goes for Japan and South Korea, both of the nations have a defense pact with the US. None of them have been attacked after the world war 2 and the Korean war.

All these nations, have been able to focus their wealth on education, infrastructure, technology and manufacturing. Today, they’re all developed, with no worries about attacks or having sophisticated weapons which requires heavy amounts of money, as the US provides them with protection

Welcoming move

Yes go ask South Vietnam, oh wait....
The examples are all of the past, when the US and the public had an appetite for adventurism. That’s long gone.
 
. . .
Yes go ask South Vietnam, oh wait....
The examples are all of the past, when the US and the public had an appetite for adventurism. That’s long gone.

Just ask Saddam how it feels to be attacking an American ally
 
.
Just ask Saddam how it feels to be attacking an American ally

Which has lots of oil, oh you might want to ask him how being buddies with the US turned out, or are we going to wash away the Iran/Iraq war?


1603864954535.jpeg



Th U.S. provided intelligence and logistical support, which played a role in arming Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War. Under the Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bushadministrations, the U.S. authorized the sale to Iraq of numerous dual-use technology (items with both military and civilian applications), including chemicals which can be used in manufacturing of pesticides or chemical weapons and live viruses and bacteria, such as anthrax and bubonic plague used in medicine and the manufacture of vaccines or weaponized for use in biological weapons.

A report of the U.S. Senate's Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs concluded that the U.S. under the successive presidential administrations sold materials including anthrax, and botulism to Iraq right up until March 1992. The chairman of the Senate committee, Don Riegle, said: "The executive branch of our government approved 771 different export licenses for sale of dual-use technology to Iraq. I think it's a devastating record."[124] According to several former officials, the State and Commerce departments promoted trade in such items as a way to boost U.S. exports and acquire political leverage over Saddam.[125]


The U.S. provided critical battle planning assistance at a time when U.S. intelligence agencies knew that Iraqi commanders would employ chemical weapons in waging the war, according to senior military officers with direct knowledge of the program. The U.S. carried out this covert program at a time when Secretary of State George P. Shultz, United States Secretary of Defense Frank C. Carlucci and National Security Adviser General Colin L. Powell were publicly condemning Iraq for its use of poison gas, especially after Iraq attacked Kurdish villagers in Halabja in March 1988. U.S. officials publicly condemned Iraq's employment of mustard gas, sarin, VX and other poisonous agents, but sixty Defense Intelligence Agency officers were secretly providing detailed information on Iranian deployments, tactical planning for battles, plans for airstrikes and bomb-damage assessments for Iraq. It has long been known that the U.S. provided intelligence assistance, such as satellite photography, to Saddam's regime. Carlucci said: "My understanding is that what was provided" to Iraq "was general order of battle information, not operational intelligence." "I certainly have no knowledge of U.S. participation in preparing battle and strike packages," he said, "and doubt strongly that that occurred." "I did agree that Iraq should not lose the war, but I certainly had no foreknowledge of their use of chemical weapons." Secretary of State Powell, through a spokesman, said the officers' description of the program was "dead wrong," but declined to discuss it. His deputy, Richard L. Armitage, a senior defense official at the time, used an expletive relayed through a spokesman to indicate his denial that the United States acquiesced in the use of chemical weapons.[126]

Concern about the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iranand about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistanprompted Iraq to reexamine seriously the nature of its relationship with the United States. This process led to a gradual warming of relations between the two countries. In 1981 Iraq and the United States engaged in low level, official talks on matters of mutual interest such as trade and regional security. In March 1982 the USA decided to remove Iraq from its list of countries supporting terrorism in order to be able to help Saddam Hussein to win the Iraq-Iran war.[127] Following, the United States extended credits to Iraq for the purchase of American agricultural commodities,[127] the first time this had been done since 1967. More significant, in 1983 the Baathist government hosted a United States special Middle East envoy, the highest-ranking American official to visit Baghdad in more than sixteen years. In a U.S. bid to open full diplomatic relations with Iraq, the country was removed from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Ostensibly, this was because of improvement in the regime's record, although former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Noel Koch later stated, "No one had any doubts about [the Iraqis'] continued involvement in terrorism ... The real reason was to help them succeed in the war against Iran."[128] In 1984, when the United States inaugurated "Operation Staunch" to halt shipment of arms to Iran by third countries, no similar embargo was attempted against Iraq because Iraq had expressed its desire to negotiate an end to the war. All of these initiatives prepared the ground for Iraq and the United States to reestablish diplomatic relations in November 1984. Iraq was the last of the Arab countries to resume diplomatic relations with the U.S.[129]

In early 1988, Iraq's relations with the United States were generally cordial.
 
Last edited:
.
Saddam was being played by US ...like a record. Frontside and backside.

India should beware of US true intentions before forging any alliance.
 
.
WHITE PEOPLE ARE THE PROBLEM
You should tell that to every Caucasian Canadian you meet
Also the pact to hand over the entire country to them.
Already done

Mao offered 10m women for trade with US

1603868557989.png

India is so insecure at the moment that it is willing to give everything including money, prestige and sovereignty to Uncle Sam. In the end Uncle is going to leave India as usual high and dry.
Already did,

USA threatened to bomb India back to stoneage despite all our cooperation with them through the cold war
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom