cocomo
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,636
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
I like Partap Banu Mehta's version which seems to reflect the ground reality most closely. He starts the history from Sir Syed Ahmed khan and identifies democracy as the root of division. Sir Syed realized that democracy is the only Internationally accepted form of rule in the modern age and it is the game of numbers, which means majority rule where rights of minorities are subject to the whims of the majority. Ever if rights are enshrined in the constitution, it can be changed by the majority any day. Partap Banu posits this delimma is still faced by the minorities of India (especially Muslims), ie majority in India can elect RSS terrorists that can take away Muslim rights. To avoid this uncertainty, Muslims politicians pre-partition wanted a system where Muslim rights won't be subject to the mood of Hindus. Pakistan exists because Congress representing the Hindus declined to allow such a system where Muslims won't be under their thumb (the results of which you can see in Rapestan now where Hindu terrorists are garlanded).
Watch this video where he goes in depth describing the fears of Hindus which makes them act they way they do. He insinuates Hindus cannot intellectually fight the conversion to Islam so they have to adopt coercive measures.
Watch this video where he goes in depth describing the fears of Hindus which makes them act they way they do. He insinuates Hindus cannot intellectually fight the conversion to Islam so they have to adopt coercive measures.