Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TO be honest some speculations is indeed there i have to admitWhich is the problem, because taking capabilities under consideration that one fighter might get in future, is not a fact. Similarly, one could say the Su 35 will get the Pak Fa AESA the next upgrades, which even increases the long range detection advantage..., but that's as much speculation as including Rafales CFTs in a comparison today right?
First of all, these figures are speculation only, secondly they still proves you wrong about Rafale having a clear advantage in A2A, since even if the RCS would be 2m 2, the IRBIS-E would detect the Rafale earlier than the RBE 2 the Su 35.
Btw, when you look at AWACS detection ranges for cruise missiles, you will often find a RCS of 1 or 2m 2 for them, just a hint what RCS those 2 fuel tanks might have.
Actually from quiet some talks with French forumers, even French professionals, but the point is, you made your conclusions too fast, or based on the wrong points, see FSO NG now. That again is a possible future upgrade (which is not even fixed and mainly unknown yet) and can't be taken into a comparison now, because it's only a claim and makes you look biased as ptldM3 said.
As said, it's most likely the otherway around, since the RCS in A2A configs are similar, while the Su35 has longer detection range. In WVR instead, Rafale might be equal or even superior in maneuverability and has the better close combat missiles as well (higher offbore sight, LOAL and data link capabilities).
But still Chinese getting Pak-fa AESA radar on SU35 is more speculative than Rafale's getting CFT
See those Detectection values can also be called as Speculative as IRBIS E radar have never come face to face with Rafale
Stealth doesnt gurantee invisibilty everytime u still have to rely on Electronic jamming no matter how stealthy u make a plane .
IF u think RCS of fuel tank can add 1m2 then may god bless F 22
even if FSO may be longer detection range but it MICA IRmissiles have atbest 60 km range meanwhile SU 35 's IRST may be having less range but it has R 27 Et which has 100 km range
engage radio-emitting air targets...and in cases when the enemy targets protect their aircraft with anti-radar active jamming
Well in BVR warfare Rafale has the edge thanks to It's PASSIVE detection abilty , superior electronic jamming
capabilty & Meteor ramjet missiles (Longest no escape zone missiles) with superior AWACS support
rafale is getting UNILINK version of Meteor missile which is stated inferior to what typhoon & gripen are getting is
it true??
Well u cited that SU 35 could also have PAK fa AESA radar i meant u insisted that Chinese could get PAkfa aesa radar .Who said they get Pak Fa AESA? They get IRBIS E if they buy the Su 35, which is a fact, CFTs sadly are not fully developed yet, which is a fact as well. Only because we both would like to see them, doesn't make it a fact somehow.
No, we have manufacturer sources about the performance of the radar, while we don't have any reliable source about the RCSs of the Su 35 / Rafale. That's why the earlier (although always taken with a pinch of salt) is more reliable than the speculated RCS figures in forums.
Of course not, but it will make the fighter very hard to detect by radar, which is not the case for normal fighters with external payloads. So stealth can at least reduces one possible detection thread to a minimum, while normal fighters just try to reduce it as much as they can (coatings, design, size, reducing external payloads).
Why? It still will have a lower RCS than most current generation fighters, it will have better radar and passive detection capabilities than most current generation fighters, it will have better jamming capabilities than most current generation fighters, so even like this it hardly has anything to fear so far. But the fact remains, external loads increase the RCS and the more, or the bigger they are, the more the increase, which is an advantage for the Flanker again.
I am talking about R 27 ir guided missile not EM guided missile oneAs I said, I doubt that the FSO IR has effectively more range and the range of the R27 on paper doesn't mean it would be useful in reality, since you have to detect and track the target first. Also the R27 is aimed to...
Another biased point don't you think? Why would the Su 35 don't have AWACS support?
I have asked that same question toNot sure what you mean with unlink, but the difference will be that Rafale can't benefit from the 2 way data link of the missile, so it won't be able to receive data from the missile, unlike Gripen and EF. As far as I understood it, that limits Rafale only in the way that a second Rafale can't re-target the missile to another target, than the launch Rafale initially had chosen.
Manufacturer sources can also be taken with a pinch of salt
U missed the pun
Drop tanks can make unstealthy
Now phalcon is superior to chinese AWACS ,now if u think that is also biased I should quit foruming for good
but they say it wont affect kill probability
If my source is correct, the Rafale has a T/W ratio of 1.19 and the Su-35 has a T/W ratio of 1.30.
In face of a Su-35, the Rafale pilot would have to reach a decision quickly. Or else, he'll be hopelessly overpowered.
The Rafale has more hard-points (meaning that it can carry drop tanks and still carry as many bombs/missiles as the -35) not to mention the Rafale is quite likely to have CFTs if/when the IAF funds it, the TWR difference is negligible and given the Rafale has superior BVR weapons the TWR that will only come into play in a WVR fight the TWR advantage of the SU-35 doesn't mean much.@DrSomnath999 Effectiveness of electronics is something that is very hard to establish.
If my source is correct, the Rafale has a T/W ratio of 1.19 and the Su-35 has a T/W ratio of 1.30.
http://www.defence.pk/forums/air-warfare/72354-thrust-weight-ratios-all-fighter-planes.html
This is even given that the Su-35 has nearly twice the amount of fuel capacity, and weight 19,000 lbs more.
I think that the Su-35 has the performance advantage. It has a higher T/W ratio, along with a higher fuel capacity.
This allows it to have greater persistence, and play dirty games which the Rafale may not be able. This includes turning and running from missiles during BVR fights more often than the Rafale can.
Do we need to even talk about a dogfight?
So survivability is a factor here, and a very crucial one.
Not saying that the Rafale is inferior to the Su-35. The pilot also matters!
In face of a Su-35, the Rafale pilot would have to reach a decision quickly. Or else, he'll be hopelessly overpowered.
It's kinda like comparing a man to a woman. The Su-35 is a man, whereas Rafale is a woman