Please quote me with substantial proof and facts only. Not some individual analysis. And i do not have enough time to watch a video. Could you please type that for me?
IDK if it is true or NOT. It might be, it might not be. What i think that people who make claims should present some substantial proof in support of their claims, not just some hot air propaganda.
I'm a Mechanical Engineer.
"In data and Facts i trust, rest all i analyse."
......... maybe in the "science" you study, you resort to negative proof.
That is the problem. You think i'm defending her. I'm not defending her, I'm not defending her work. I'm not saying that she did work for conversion or not. I'm not saying if she saved/helped/cured 100s or millions or billions. She might have not saved/helped/cured even a single life. And frankly i do not care about that. But blaming someone without any substantial proof is utter BS. It's just like some Pakistani friend here who make claim out of nothing.
You see, there it is. Your selective criticism. You can't say about others? In your previous post you claimed that people, if do selfless service do not accept awards if they are not publicity seeker. You generalized 'People" there very easily, and now here you are supporting that previous statement of yours. Your statements are contradictory to your previous ones.I cannot generalize about others, but Mother Teresa's need for publicity is already documented in a Book referenced above.
I will concede Ravi Shankar and Ramdev has accepted awards for their work. However Patanjali conducts free yoga camps and art of living conduct free art of living courses. They also conduct paid courses. But how is that a problem ?
How is somebody expected to produce medicine out of thin air ? How are the people preparing it supposed to be paid ? Don't the Nuns of Missionary of charity get paid ??
I cannot prove a Negative. Its a logical fallacy
Isn't that why he said that in the first place? Unless he speaks each and everything he may or may not believe in. People with conscience usually speak what they believe in.
Previously you claimed that Ramdev and Ravi shankar are selfless servant of people, just because they did not accept Padma Vibhushan. Now when i showed you proof of claiming them other awards, you are not defending them anymore. Is it, or is it not contradiction?
She is not being "blamed". She is a missionary for earth's sake. Conversion is what missionaries do. And that is what mb is saying. If she wasn't converting, she wouldn't be a missionary, ain't it?
The statement you quoted here was in response to another statement which was deleted later one which asked me to prove if he really meant what he said. That statement was in no way meant for you. I forgot to delete that part in reply to you."Isn't that why he said that in the first place?" ........... Now that is classic Prejudice. A preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience.
How do you know why he said, what he said ?
As a matter of fact he was responding to a statement made by an ex BSF DG that Mother Teresa did seva with a Motive.
"People with conscience usually speak what they believe in" ....... this is again a logical fallacy. Its an opinion masquerading as a Fact. People with conscience also speak Lies
So much for "science" and you swearing by it.
