Why people should NOT get married in Pakistan

[ghazi52]

.......
Deleted

 

[Azad-Kashmiri]

@Zarvan, are you ??



dignity and honor...

Don't you dear mock our religion! Just because they have beards and the other pictures with sisters in niqab. They have more honour and dignity than you do!

 

[FaujHistorian]

These idiots want to impose the 'normals' of west to us.
If the west has progressed,it doesn't mean that we copy paste their whatever into our culture and society.The good in their societies must be adopted and their ideas/norms which collide head on with our ideology/culture should be rejected and detested at once.
And for a Muslim society,what's normal is what was approved by Rasool Allah SW and his legacy.
This 'tehreek' of redefining the norms can go to hell.

No one can impose "West" on us.

People try to adapt to contemporary ways of living.

No one can live like people used to live 1400 years ago.

How many of the internet Islamists are using donkey as a travel mode when they want to go for hujj?
or sleep on sand dune
or send horses to carry letters

life in 700 AD can only exist in museums and in made up memories.
In 2015, you will use computers, Iphones, refrigerators, cars and airplanes.
Similarly your lifestyle will be just like people from "advanced societies" of TODAY aka in 2015.

Not in 700 AD

Otherwise you will continue traveling and sleeping with donkeys.

 

[Penguin]

Marriage is a sham in the west, that is why the birth rates have plummeted and western civilization itself is collapsing in on itself. Any man marrying a western woman is basically handing over everything he owns to the woman (even if they have the toilet paper valued document known as an alimony).

Prenuptial agreement mean anything to you?

 

[jamahir]

Don't you dear mock our religion! Just because they have beards and the other pictures with sisters in niqab. They have more honour and dignity than you do!

"our religion" includes me too by birth.

the burqa in the center, in glasses, is asiya andrabi, from india-administered kashmir... she is chief of "dukhtaraan-e-millat", a all-burqa reactionary group which once had threatened to throw acid on the faces on kashmiri ladies who don't cover themselves in that tent.

 

[Azad-Kashmiri]

"our religion" includes me too by birth.

Then brother, why do you mock the Sunnah?

 

[jamahir]

Then brother, why do you mock the Sunnah?

the burqa in the center, in glasses, is asiya andrabi, from india-administered kashmir... she is chief of "dukhtaraan-e-millat", a all-burqa reactionary group which once had threatened to throw acid on the faces on kashmiri ladies who don't cover themselves in that tent.

i am socialist, deriving my conclusions about something on terms of whether they are humane or anti-human, just or unjust, scientific or reactionary, eternal or impractical, simplified or unncessarily complicated.

 

[Azad-Kashmiri]

the burqa in the center, in glasses, is asiya andrabi, from india-administered kashmir... she is chief of "dukhtaraan-e-millat", a all-burqa reactionary group which once had threatened to throw acid on the faces on kashmiri ladies who don't cover themselves in that tent.

You've changed your post, it was not about some e-milat group, the post was in reply to Zarvan's post!

So what have the beards got to do with e-milat?

don't cover themselves in that tent.

Are you REALLY Muslim? To call an Islamic attire with derogatory terms is sinful!

 

[jamahir]

You've changed your post, it was not about some e-milat group, the post was in reply to Zarvan's post!

So what have the beards got to do with e-milat?

i was only showing some beautiful people in beard and burqa.

Are you REALLY Muslim? To call an Islamic attire with derogatory terms is sinful!

you are new to pdf... many muslim members call it that.

burqa has nothing to do with islam... if anything, it is anti-islami.

 

[TankMan]

burqa has nothing to do with islam... if anything, it is anti-islami.

A burka is not anti-Islamic, for God's sake, not even the shuttlecock burkas that cover the face entirely. But it is not Islamic either. Covering of the face was a limited directive issued specifically to the Prophet's wives in a specific time period.

As per Islam, all women do not have to wear them, they didn't have to wear them in the Prophet's time either. It is especially inappropriate when living in foreign countries where covering the face is normally associated with preparing to rob a bank.

But to call it 'anti-Islamic' is absurd. It's a piece of cloth. You can wear it however you like, you can use it for whatever you like. It only becomes anti-Islamic if you use it to harm others (e.g by hiding bombs).

 

[jamahir]

A burka is not anti-Islamic, for God's sake, not even the shuttlecock burkas that cover the face entirely. But it is not Islamic either. Covering of the face was a limited directive issued specifically to the Prophet's wives in a specific time period.

As per Islam, all women do not have to wear them, they didn't have to wear them in the Prophet's time either. It is especially inappropriate when living in foreign countries where covering the face is normally associated with preparing to rob a bank.

But to call it 'anti-Islamic' is absurd. It's a piece of cloth. You can wear it however you like, you can use it for whatever you like. It only becomes anti-Islamic if you use it to harm others (e.g by hiding bombs).

1. it is anti-islami because it denies the ladies the right to be a visible part of society, with the right to interact at a comfortable level for all parties concerned.

2. hiding bombs in burqa comes when the burqa is considered a acceptable part of society and is supposed to be not looked at with suspicion and contempt.

3. there was veil ( face cover ) in west asia before islam came about... however, the burqa ( full cover ) came from somewhere in the iran-culture lands.

 

[Azad-Kashmiri]

1. it is anti-islami because it denies the ladies the right to be a visible part of society, with the right to interact at a comfortable level for all parties concerned.

2. hiding bombs in burqa comes when the burqa is considered a acceptable part of society and is supposed to be not looked at with suspicion and contempt.

3. there was veil ( face cover ) in west asia before islam came about... however, the burqa ( full cover ) came from somewhere in the iran-culture lands.

Both of you stop making things up and calling it Islam. This is your understanding. The hadith are there and the quranic verses are there. I want you to look for it and if you can't it, then I'll give you the evidences.

 

[TankMan]

it is anti-islami because it denies the ladies the right to be a visible part of society, with the right to interact at a comfortable level for all parties concerned.

That is a valid argument. But the burka in itself is not anti-Islamic. Sometimes women want to wear it for perfectly legitimate reasons and they should be allowed to do so. It does not deny the ladies any rights unless it is forcefully imposed, which would be anti-Islamic indeed.

. hiding bombs in burqa comes when the burqa is considered a acceptable part of society and is supposed to be not looked at with suspicion and contempt.

That was just an example of how a burka could be misused. Imposing it on women is another such example. At the end of the day, everything from a piece of cloth to a calculator can be used for both good and bad purposes.

there was veil ( face cover ) in west asia before islam came about... however, the burqa ( full cover ) came from somewhere in the iran-culture lands.

Yes, yes there was. And indeed it is believed to have originated from Persian culture, long before Islam. There are also references to it in Biblical texts.

Both of you stop making things up and calling it Islam. This is your understanding. The hadith are there and the quranic verses are there. I want you to look for it and if you can't it, then I'll give you the evidences.

I can back all my statements about it with evidence from the Quran. I don't need you to look for anything for me, though I appreciate the offer.

The covering of the face was a limited directive issued specifically to the Prophet's wives in a specific time period. It is not required for all women. But it is not 'anti-Islamic' or 'wrong' if women want to wear it. As long as it's their own choice.

 

[livingdead]

 

[Saifullah]

Living in the past obviously.

Clean up Karachi without army.

Then come back and talk please

hahaha you are funny. Don't mind but you have some Woman in your self. Linking everything to every thing else and here you go having "Discussion".