What's new

Why Mattis came to Pakistan! actual the story.

@BHarwana

Well, there are different angles to consider.

On topic:

Pakistan-US relations are filled with ups and downs throughout history. When the interests of both countries align in regards to a regional development, the resultant strategic partnership works beautifully for a while. However, it doesn't takes much long for both countries to fall out of line. Pakistani political instability, corruption, lack of appreciation of American investments in Pakistan and lack of effective lobbying in the US are contributing factors. Additionally, developments in the Middle East (i.e. Israel - Palestine dispute) also complicate the prospects of improving people-to-people level contacts between the two countries. On top, Indians are making inroads into the US and leveraging their connections to their advantage.

Pakistan can re-align its geopolitical position by taking cues from Turkey; Turkey is not only a member of NATO but has a working relationship with both Israel and Russia alongside supporting Palestinian cause. Unfortunately, Pakistani Mullah brigade is not as wise.

As for American warnings; with the chapter of ISIS closing in the Middle East, US is shifting its attention back to Afghanistan under the leadership of Trump administration. This administration has expressed its desire to take action against all terrorist networks and Taliban in Afghanistan (good news for the Afghan government). However, I am perplexed by the threats to Pakistan much like any Pakistani.

Pakistan has acted against a number of terrorist networks within Pakistan and deserves appreciation for its efforts against terrorism in the region. Even if some terror-networks are still intact, cooperation is the way forward.

Trump administration should come forward in a positive manner. Threats will only fuel Anti-US sentiments in the region. If you can get the job done with a carrot, why use stick?

For so many years Pakistan has seen US friendship and suffered lets try to be enemies and see If we can progress. Secondly Trump is only three years more the next President will have different policies so it will be a different ball game.
 
.
Oh, two trolls uniting in their cause. How convenient. Just what we need.

I am a Pakistani and I live in Pakistan. However, unlike you two, I am under no illusion or harbor intense hatred for any state. I have relatives in the US and I admire it for its accomplishments and contributions to the world.

The very computer you are using, is an American invention, genius.

And I can provide solid evidence of every statement in my previous post.
and what about American CONTRIBUTION in destroying Nations? plz dont teach us here. we are as aware as you,and we dont have relative in USA as you do , All of my family and relatives live in Pakistan and its only home i have got. :taz:
 
. . . .
US is in no position to make any policy on Afghanistan, they have fucked up miserable in all their policies in all their ventures. If they want to save face and find a real solution to Afghanistan issue, they should listen to Pakistan and do as they are told. Idiots should not be leaders. Their stance and bullying at UNGA proves that current US leadership comprises of clueless dickheads


Mattis wants Pakistan, US, Afghanistan to launch simultaneous action against Taliban


December 21, 2017

James-Mattis.jpg
ISLAMABAD: US Defense Secretary James Mattis had told Pakistani leaders during his visit earlier this month that the American forces intend to intensify attacks against Taliban in Afghanistan and that Pakistan must also take action against Taliban leaders at the same time to weaken the Afghan insurgents and force them to come to the negotiation table.

An official, who is privy to the details of Mattis’ meetings in Islamabad on December 4, told Daily Times that the US defence chief believed Afghan government had lost territory to the Taliban over the past few months and the US wanted to stop Taliban from more gains.

Last month a US watchdog said in its latest report that the Taliban have expanded control to 54 districts of Afghanistan’s 407 districts over the past six months. “As of August 2017, there were 54 districts under insurgent control or influence, an increase of nine districts over the last six months. Therefore, 13.3% of the country’s total districts are now under insurgent control or influence, a more than a two percentage-point increase over the last six months, and a five-point increase from the same period in 2016,” according to the report issued on Nov 1 by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), a monitoring agency that oversees reconstruction projects and other activities in Afghanistan.

Mattis in his maiden visit to Pakistan as defense secretary had met a high level Pakistani delegation led by Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi. “Mattis had told us that US forces plan serious and strong action against the Taliban. We will target them where they are. He also asked us to target the Taliban and the Haqqani Network leaders as Afghan problem cannot be solved without such a forceful action,” the official quoted Mattis as telling the Pakistani leaders.

Nathan Tek, regional spokesman for the US State Department, in response to a question referred the matter to US embassy in Pakistan which also evaded comments. “The U.S. Embassy does not comment on the content of private diplomatic engagements. No comment at the moment,” the spokesman said in a text message.

He referred to a statement by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who had stated that “when we rolled out the South Asia Strategy sometimes our conversations with Pakistan will be private.”

The US has long been accusing Pakistan of sheltering the Afghan Taliban and the Haqqani Network, the charges Pakistan denies.

The American embassy in its statement on the visit had stated earlier that the secretary reiterated President Trump’s message that Pakistan must increase its efforts to eradicate militants and terrorists operating within the country.

The Pakistani official said, “This time Mattis tone was not threatening … instead he insisted that both US and Pakistan should take action simultaneously. He expected Pakistan’s simultaneous action with the US campaign in Afghanistan will weaken and cause disarray among the Taliban fighters that will force the Taliban leaders to join the reconciliation process.”

He said the US defense secretary had also clarified that the US has adopted ‘condition-based strategy’ and wants the Taliban first join peace process with the government and end fighting. “Mattis said the US will discuss departure when peace completely returns to Afghanistan,” the official added.

But the official, who has been part of a series of meetings with the US officials, said Islamabad believes the US strategic game is on in Afghanistan and it is ready for long-term presence. “President Trump had earlier publicly stated as to why the US has been in Afghanistan and had also asked his team to prepare a strategy to end the war. But later Trump’s administration reversed the Obama strategy and adopted condition-based strategy that US will depart only if the situation improves,” he said.

On their part, the Taliban say the Trump’s strategy for Afghanistan had ‘angered’ the group. “We have increased attacks on the enemy,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said when a query was posted on his WhatsApp.

The spokesman said there was no change in Taliban policy towards peace negotiations and added that the Taliban will not talk with Kabul administration. He, however, reiterated Taliban’s policy to sit face-to-face with the Americans to ‘discuss timeframe for end to invasion’.

Published in Daily Times, December 21st 2017.

https://dailytimes.com.pk/163801/ma...ghanistan-launch-simultaneous-action-taliban/
 
.
Back
Top Bottom