Iggy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2009
- Messages
- 8,300
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
I sense a blind hatred here. pick the following 2 scenarios
(1) Do not feed us animals prohibited by our religion
(2) Do not allow non-hindus to eat animals they love to eat.
Which one infringes right of others ? which one is harmless.
In the "Pork situation", there was a good possibility that some of the kids may give it a try out of curiosity and eat Pork. is this allowable ?. This is not like serving beef/pork to grown college students in hostel. who are the responsible people in the school ? I understand destruction of some furniture is too much, at least those erumely folks did not prevent non-muslims from eating pork ? What the teacher did was a minor mistake and should be excused.
See that is the difference. All this Maharashtra ban does, is take Hinduism to extremes, condemn mild-hindus/low-caste hindus/chrisitans/muslims/parsees from savouring beef, which should be condemned.
Actually the pork was served during NCC training and the teacher informed students that those who do not want pork can leave.. Some students had some hatred towards the teacher and they spread rumors that the teacher forcefully feed Pork to students..This caused the outrage..Our resident bigot just using these kind of news for justifying his actions..