Irrelevant. Canibalism is illegal. Period. You want to be fair on principles, you do not get to cherry pick. The rules have to be same for all minorities.
If you are willing to be "unfair" then beef ban is tenable because the majority is offended by it.
Nonsense. Our drafts does not control our action. Just because there is a law on murder, do murder not happen ?
Human rules are broke all the time. Nature's laws, cosmic laws CANNOT be broken. You cannot deny gravity, or time or life. You have no control over them. You can only manipulate them.
If you cannot enforce it evenly, then your rule is a sham. It is only for the weak and for the poor and for the foolish.
Laws of dharma are not drafted by humans, it is only understood by humans. That is the law that rules the world in all practical sense.
It is, but for a conscious being, you are held accountable for your actions. Killing humans are also within the laws of nature. Law of nature is not necessarily the law of man.
LOL at your understanding of logic. On one hand you say might is right, so logic is not required, and when convenient you cluth at logic.
We do not deny the same status to all living beings. Law of dharma is equally applicable on all and for all living beings. But the gap between our conciousness and their makes a difference. Even plant have life.
But slaughter of domesticated animals under our protection and exploitation is more sinful than the slaughter of wild animals. It is unethical and immoral.
Killing of ALL creatures is unethical when we can avoid it.
For Hindus the morality and ethics are defined in our scriptures. You can debate the scritpures, but you cannot debate faith
Since you do not know any scriptures and are ignorant of the moral and ethical guidelines and frameworks, you are foolishly debating faith. Every-time I ask you to name the scriptures you follow, you run away and come back when you feel that question has died out.
The ban on Bovines is a matter of faith. You deny others that faith and cal yourself a give of Freedom
..... now that is crappy logic.
. Total HUBRIS and Christian supremacist versions of history
AMUL founder was Tribhuvandas Patel, A Gujarati HINDU.
AMUL was formed when the farmers of Kaira approached
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel under the leadership of local farmer leader
Tribhuvandas K. Patel. He advised them to form a
cooperative and supply milk directly to the Bombay Milk Scheme instead of Polson (who did the same but gave them low prices). He sent
Morarji Desai to organise the farmers. In 1946, the milk farmers of the area went on a strike which led to the setting up of the cooperative to collect and process milk. Milk collection was decentralized, as most producers were marginal farmers who could deliver, at most, 1–2 litres of milk per day. Cooperatives were formed for each village, too.
Kurian was a government employee who was appointed as a dairy engineer at Government Research Creamery, a milk powder factory, in Anand.
Kurian later was a marketing man which is how he made his name. All his appointments were political appointments.