Why India wants an unstable Pakistan?

[Sheikh Rauf]

Does he bothers you ?

Not your fault bro, that your ancestors surrendered to barbaric invaders without giving a hard fight and were later forced to convert.... offering resistance and building a nation was never in your blood.. for the last 2500 yrs u people never produced a strong leader there was never a strong kingdom built by you people...

i am not going to argue cuz you are not only worthless but ignorant .. it will take nothing but to waste energy and effort..
you have nothing in history doesnt mean no one els have its normal prospect of indian now a days.
i am not going where hindu slaughters buddist and converted... and kill its own women with dead husband..
Muslim did a wonderful job to introduce a divorce thing and help you be civilized learn urdu persian and didnt convert by force. wonder why you still in majority.. question is why didnt they would have been easy life..
does the reality bothers you.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

May be a Pakistan divided into 3 will be more a reality

Wow what confusion and illusion the utter constipation these people live in

We ruled u for 1000 years

Morons there are more Muslims in India than in pak......
Why do u steal our history

Pakistan divided into 4 proviences its gonna be 5th one Kashmir..
lol which insane really wanna steal your stories.. its good for old fiction in books but reality is that even you guys hardly ever read it..
to be honest you have no stories and history.. changing names of cities and bringing some maharajas to change muslim rulers cant change the fact...
you can run but cant hide~

 

[jaatram]

Pakistan divided into 4 proviences its gonna be 5th one Kashmir..
lol which insane really wanna steal your stories.. its good for old fiction in books but reality is that even you guys hardly ever read it..
to be honest you have no stories and history.. changing names of cities and bringing some maharajas to change muslim rulers cant change the fact...
you can run but cant hide~

You are the one who has no history that's why you have to import heroes like Abdali ghauri and Tipu from neighboring countries.

 

[NIA]

You are the one who has no history that's why you have to import heroes like Abdali ghauri and Tipu from neighboring countries.

Tipu Sultan was an Indian king and his devotion towards lord Ram..And these pakistani stole his name and named after a crappy ship!

 

[Rahil khan]

Military is not the only concern that a concern that a country has, there are other concerns too. From that stand point, yes, it is indeed true Indians are much more concerned about other things than Pakistan.

Pakistan started four wars with India and happens to be the most unstable country of the region. So, it is important to keep our borders safe, cannot neglect that either. However, for a typical Indian there are other matters which concern him far more.

Kidooo before i get myself trapped into a long utter nonsense of blame game with you....at least think before playing with words... it appears that even Afghanistan... a country which is occupied by the foreign forces...a country in which not a single structure was standing on it's feet 15 years ago appears to be more stable for you as compared with Pakistan...it's your selective perception...i can't do anything about it...secondly..war has many shapes and India has waged wars on almost every neighbor of his own...should i give details.??..so please stop this repetition of typical spoon fed words against Pakistan...no matter what arguments i shall provide to you...theory of selectivity shall always be smiling on every single corner...tall and wide...End of discussion...!!

 

[Bornubus]

Inferiority complex

Its like a Somali Christian claims that his ancestors ruled British India.


Secondly every Indian are thankful to jinnah and Nehru for partition.

Thirdly stop living in lala land to dream of parity with India Economically,Militarily and Technologically.

 

[nForce]

Kidooo before i get myself trapped into a long utter nonsense of blame game with you....at least think before playing with words... it appears that even Afghanistan... a country which is occupied by the foreign forces...a country in which not a single structure was standing on it's feet 15 years ago appears to be more stable for you as compared with Pakistan...it's your selective perception...i can't do anything about it...secondly..war has many shapes and India has waged wars on almost every neighbor of his own...should i give details.??..so please stop this repetition of typical spoon fed words against Pakistan...no matter what arguments i shall provide to you...theory of selectivity shall always be smiling on every single corner...tall and wide...End of discussion...!!

See, I gave you the Indian viewpoint that Pakistan is not the most major concern here. You don't want to believe it, its up to you.

 

[coffee_cup]

I saw a pakistani crying on T.V asking why did taliban kill there children, why dont they cross the border and kill hindu children... let me be honest, the sympathy I had for the parents who lost there children suddenly vanished at that moment...

I can give you 100 times more examples of extremist hindutavas saying the same or even worst about Pakistan and Muslims. Would you want to see them as well? Or your selective memory is reserved only for Pakistanis?

These kind of people exists everywhere in the world.

The vast majority both in Pakistan and India are just normal people and have no ill will towards each other. It is just the extremists who are the troublemakers. And unfortunately these extremists happen to be in the govt and all powerful positions in india.

@nForce that answers your judgement as well.

 

[Sheikh Rauf]

You are the one who has no history that's why you have to import heroes like Abdali ghauri and Tipu from neighboring countries.

dude we took our legacy and build Pakistan... and leave you with empty buildings and gave you a good reason to cry for

 

[coffee_cup]

Sicahen was a vacant land. Pakistan did send a team as well, to claim it. Indian team beat Pakistani team by a day I think. Now be a good sport. You people never had the guts to handle a defeat.

Wait a minute, are you saying it was a fair sport for india to occupy Siachen? And at the same time complaining about Kargil?

Now what kind of sportsmanship is that?

 

[itachiii]

Does he bothers you ?



i am not going to argue cuz you are not only worthless but ignorant .. it will take nothing but to waste energy and effort..
you have nothing in history doesnt mean no one els have its normal prospect of indian now a days.
i am not going where hindu slaughters buddist and converted... and kill its own women with dead husband..
Muslim did a wonderful job to introduce a divorce thing and help you be civilized learn urdu persian and didnt convert by force. wonder why you still in majority.. question is why didnt they would have been easy life..
does the reality bothers you.

we are in majority cause unlike present day pakistan, present day India was not completely under foreign rule. there were always areas of resistance provided by us towards foreigners... it was never a smooth ride for foreigners to rule us... there were kingdoms like vijayanagras of south, ahoms of north east, gajapatis of orissa who offered a heavy resistance to those barbaric invaders.. and then the rise of marathas and sikhs of north that almost liberated the present day sub-continent from the evil clutches of those barbarians.. muslims civilized hindus ??? keep that notion to pakistan itself... that fallacy can be used to justify the mass conversion of u people...

 

[jaatram]

dude we took our legacy and build Pakistan... and leave you with empty buildings and gave you a good reason to cry for

Sure you did, it's for everyone to see who is crying about Kashmir since you guys left

 

[coffee_cup]

Normal Indians don't care enough Pak to bother save for cricket or when a terror attack happens. Some of them are idiotic enough to trend IndiaWithPak.

From a strategic perspective, since Pak provides no benefits to India and is only a cause for trouble, there is no reason for India to wish for a stable Pak that will use that stability to attack India. However, Pak does serve as a buffer of sorts from the mess in Afghan. Thus, India would want an unstable Pak for the next decade or two, however not so unstable that it disintegrates entirely. Post that, depending on the relative positions, the stance can be reassessed to one supporting total disintegration.

The cool thing for India is that she does not to spend significant resources and virtually no man-power to achieve these objectives as Pak is doing such a wonderful job of destabilizing themselves as a result of their own 'strategic assets'.

The reasons that people in Pak such as the OP seem to provide for India's intent are entirely immaterial.

That is right, india has no wish for a stable Pakistan and that is the main point of this thread - to find out the root cause of indian insecurities and find a way to adress them.

Saying things like "India does not care about Pakistan", or "India does not spend significat resources and vitrually no man-power to achieve those objectives" is as far fetched from reality as you can imagine.

In reality, india has been spending more than significant amount of resources to destabilize not only Pakistan but also other neighboring countries. Training, arming, sponsoring, brain washing large terrorist organizations such as LTTE, Mukti Bahini, BLA and TTP does require a lot of resources and manpower.

And again, this is not the normal people who are the problem, these are the extremist hindutavas sitting in the govt who are the real danger to the regional peace.

India does have more than fair share of her own fault lines: Sikhs, Naxals/Maoists, Muslims, Chrisitans, Dalits are but a few examples and if some other country with enough economic clout decides to use them, india is doomed. So I think, indians must realize that they are following a very very dangerous path by spreading cross-border terrorism.

 

[jaatram]

Wait a minute, are you saying it was a fair sport for india to occupy Siachen? And at the same time complaining about Kargil?

Now what kind of sportsmanship is that?

Sportsmanship?

 

[nForce]

Wait a minute, are you saying it was a fair sport for india to occupy Siachen? And at the same time complaining about Kargil?

Now what kind of sportsmanship is that?

Nobody had any presence in Siachen glacier before both the armies raced towards it, while India had bunkers and regular presence in Kargil.