What's new

Why India no longer cares about Pakistan's nuclear threats

The well known nuclear bluff of Pakistan.

Pakistan can't use nukes against India. They are only meant for sabre-rattling.

I don't think you understand what you are saying.

But Pakistan is in no position to use a nuke and still exist afterwards.

So one could conclude that India called Pakistan's bluff and Pakistan's called India's bluff on the nukes. This is what people call it as "MAD".
 
.
Modi,s way of dealing with both Pakistan & China has been seen in last 12 months

Surgical strikes Massive artillery firing on LOC v Pakistan.

dokhlam stand off with China

there is no shirking from india

Yes, the great modi himself lead the invisible hanuman army to carry out the "surgical strike" and stare Chinese down
 
.
I do understand what I'm saying...u r just trying to change the subject bcuz u didn't have a proper comeback. U said Pakistan's nuclear threats are a bluff...to which I replied that u figured it out, it seems Kashmir is ripe for the taking by India.

Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is real, but the threat of it actually being put to use is zero. It means Pakistan will not use nukes in a war with India. The answer is simply because India controls escalation.

What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war. We are not in an equal situation.

Pakistan never claimed that it will exist afterwards. All countries on earth know what happens after the nuclear weapons exchange between two nuclear powers...Mutually Assured Destruction(MAD). It doesn't matter if Pakistan won't exist after nuking India...bcuz India wouldn't exist either.

How much do you know about nukes and what they can do?

How many nukes do you have?
How powerful are these nukes?
How many nuke-tipped missiles can you fire?
How many missiles will actually work?
How many warheads will be taken out by EW and BMD?

How many cities and towns do we have?
How much of our population is urbanized?
How much of the non-urbanized population can your nukes kill?

How many of the troops on both sides will be alive after a nuclear exchange?
How quickly can you reinforce the troops killed in a nuclear attack?
How quickly can you take advantage of a nuclear attack?

Do you even know what's the meaning of MAD and how MAD is achieved?

Find the answer to all these questions and you will know that you have no clue what you are talking about.

There are many factors that compel India in not attacking Pakistan. And although nuclear weapons are high up on the list, it's not on top of the list.

If we ever go to war, it will happen in such a way that we will win. And we will win in such a way that we will still remain a credible threat to China.
 
.
Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is real, but the threat of it actually being put to use is zero. It means Pakistan will not use nukes in a war with India. The answer is simply because India controls escalation.

What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war. We are not in an equal situation.

How? On the contrary Pakistan controls the nuclear threshold.
 
.
Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is real, but the threat of it actually being put to use is zero. It means Pakistan will not use nukes in a war with India. The answer is simply because India controls escalation.

What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war. We are not in an equal situation.



How much do you know about nukes and what they can do?

How many nukes do you have?
How powerful are these nukes?
How many nuke-tipped missiles can you fire?
How many missiles will actually work?
How many warheads will be taken out by EW and BMD?

How many cities and towns do we have?
How much of our population is urbanized?
How much of the non-urbanized population can your nukes kill?

How many of the troops on both sides will be alive after a nuclear exchange?
How quickly can you reinforce the troops killed in a nuclear attack?
How quickly can you take advantage of a nuclear attack?

Do you even know what's the meaning of MAD and how MAD is achieved?

Find the answer to all these questions and you will know that you have no clue what you are talking about.

There are many factors that compel India in not attacking Pakistan. And although nuclear weapons are high up on the list, it's not on top of the list.

If we ever go to war, it will happen in such a way that we will win. And we will win in such a way that we will still remain a credible threat to China.
Just answer one thing, whats stopping India to take over Azad Kashmir?
 
.
Haha, bhartis talking about terrorists being pushed when Bharatis are the first ones who started this game in 71 by throwing 300,000 mutkia terrorists, then in Nepal, SriLanka, Indian Occupied Kashmir where 7 lakh occupier terrorists slaughter innocent civilians with impunity.

@Topic, Pakistan's weapons are for it's defense, if push come to shove, Pakistan will make sure the opponent is destroyed to the level where it cannot stand up again ever.
 
.
. .
Why India no longer cares about Pakistan's nuclear threats
Because... Indians are now 400% radiation-resistant. :partay: :partay:

Gwcdzvl.jpg


hjLB4Vg.jpg
 
Last edited:
. .
Modi,s way of dealing with both Pakistan & China has been seen in last 12 months

Surgical strikes Massive artillery firing on LOC v Pakistan.

dokhlam stand off with China

there is no shirking from india

Yes talk is amazing from the Indians.
 
.
Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is real, but the threat of it actually being put to use is zero. It means Pakistan will not use nukes in a war with India. The answer is simply because India controls escalation.

What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war. We are not in an equal situation.



How much do you know about nukes and what they can do?

How many nukes do you have?
How powerful are these nukes?
How many nuke-tipped missiles can you fire?
How many missiles will actually work?
How many warheads will be taken out by EW and BMD?

How many cities and towns do we have?
How much of our population is urbanized?
How much of the non-urbanized population can your nukes kill?

How many of the troops on both sides will be alive after a nuclear exchange?
How quickly can you reinforce the troops killed in a nuclear attack?
How quickly can you take advantage of a nuclear attack?

Do you even know what's the meaning of MAD and how MAD is achieved?

Find the answer to all these questions and you will know that you have no clue what you are talking about.

There are many factors that compel India in not attacking Pakistan. And although nuclear weapons are high up on the list, it's not on top of the list.

If we ever go to war, it will happen in such a way that we will win. And we will win in such a way that we will still remain a credible threat to China.


This is hilarious. :rofl::rofl:

Are you having a nervous breakdown? :partay: :partay:

Coming to a border near you:

3ANpaZX.jpg
 
Last edited:
.
How? On the contrary Pakistan controls the nuclear threshold.

Not necessarily. We can pre-empt their nuclear attack with our own also.

Just answer one thing, whats stopping India to take over Azad Kashmir?

The Indian govt is not interested in increasing the Muslim population of India. But India is most definitely interested in balkanizing Pakistan.

India does not have capability to takeover AJK or GB from Pakistan.

India does. During Kargil War, our generals wanted to cross over and take it all.

Pak doesn't have the ability to defend the area.
 
.
Not necessarily. We can pre-empt their nuclear attack with our own also.



The Indian govt is not interested in increasing the Muslim population of India. But India is most definitely interested in balkanizing Pakistan.



India does. During Kargil War, our generals wanted to cross over and take it all.

Pak doesn't have the ability to defend the area.


Are you Real? Constitution of India says AJK & GB are integral part of India. There has been resolution in the parliament to reclaim AJK & GB but India shies away from taking any action even though it has capability? And the reason is India does not want to increase the Muslim population? If that is true then India should cede Kashmir and parts of Assam as that would decrease the Muslim population of India. Huh!
 
.
Are you Real? Constitution of India says AJK & GB are integral part of India. There has been resolution in the parliament to reclaim AJK & GB but India shies away from taking any action even though it has capability? And the reason is India does not want to increase the Muslim population? If that is true then India should cede Kashmir and parts of Assam as that would decrease the Muslim population of India. Huh!

I was trolling the troll.

India will take back all the occupied regions when the time is right, and not because some chest thumper wants us to attack for no real reason.

As I said, the objective is not just to take back the regions, but to also balkanize Pakistan while still having enough economic, diplomatic and military clout to counter China.

There is a threshold that's needed to be achieved where we can not only fight, but also win a two front war. The day that threshold is reached is the day we will be in a position to dictate terms to Pakistan without significant repercussions.

And that threshold is coming up really fast, that's why you see India's stance become so hawkish with both Pakistan and China.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom