I do understand what I'm saying...u r just trying to change the subject bcuz u didn't have a proper comeback. U said Pakistan's nuclear threats are a bluff...to which I replied that u figured it out, it seems Kashmir is ripe for the taking by India.
Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is real, but the threat of it actually being put to use is zero. It means Pakistan will not use nukes in a war with India. The answer is simply because India controls escalation.
What this means is the very last move Pak can make is start a nuclear war, but India has the capacity to end the war. We are not in an equal situation.
Pakistan never claimed that it will exist afterwards. All countries on earth know what happens after the nuclear weapons exchange between two nuclear powers...Mutually Assured Destruction(MAD). It doesn't matter if Pakistan won't exist after nuking India...bcuz India wouldn't exist either.
How much do you know about nukes and what they can do?
How many nukes do you have?
How powerful are these nukes?
How many nuke-tipped missiles can you fire?
How many missiles will actually work?
How many warheads will be taken out by EW and BMD?
How many cities and towns do we have?
How much of our population is urbanized?
How much of the non-urbanized population can your nukes kill?
How many of the troops on both sides will be alive after a nuclear exchange?
How quickly can you reinforce the troops killed in a nuclear attack?
How quickly can you take advantage of a nuclear attack?
Do you even know what's the meaning of MAD and how MAD is achieved?
Find the answer to all these questions and you will know that you have no clue what you are talking about.
There are many factors that compel India in not attacking Pakistan. And although nuclear weapons are high up on the list, it's not on top of the list.
If we ever go to war, it will happen in such a way that we will win. And we will win in such a way that we will still remain a credible threat to China.