Lilo
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 12, 2006
- Messages
- 200
- Reaction score
- 0
It's a well known fact. If you deny that then you're in denial.
That was not sarcasm, i really dont have a source proving that indian army was behind the "murder" of about 80,000 Kashmiris"
so i still ask u for one.
If you could be more precise as to what you're talking about, I would be able to understand you. Atm, I got no idea.
That was sarcasm if u had seen the report more clearly u would have understood it.
Table of Disputed Territories: Comparative Measures of Freedom
Trend Arrow Country and Territory PR CL Freedom Rating
Armenia/Azerbaijan
Nagorno-Karabakh 5 5 Partly Free
China
Tibet 7 7 Not Free
Cyprus
Northern (Turkish) Cyprus 2 2 Free
Georgia
Abkhazia 5 5 Partly Free
India
Kashmir 5 5 Partly Free
Israel
Israeli-Occupied Territories 6 5 Not Free
Palestinian Authority- 4 ▲ 6 ▼ Partly Free
Administered Territories
Moldova
Transnistria 6 6 Not Free
Morocco
Western Sahara 7 6 Not Free
Pakistan
Kashmir 7 5 Not Free
Russia
Chechnya 7 7 Not Free
Serbia
Kosovo 6 5 Not Free
Somalia
Somaliland 5 4 Partly Free
http://www.freedomhouse.org/uploads/press_release/fiw07_charts.pdf
see the bolded territories ..?
Their presence in the list proves that a dispute need not be in the limelight to merit its inclusion in the "not free" category.
Even Israeli-Occupied Territories are in the "not free" category (as opposed to Palestinian Authority-Administered Territories which are "partly free")...and doesnt this fact itself contradict ur conjecture that this report was contrived with judeowestern intrests in mind..??
You just need an objective mind to realize that this report is more or less balanced.
and thnx for the link.