What's new

Russia-Ukraine War - News and Developments PART 2

Footage of the strike of the Russian kamikaze drone "Lancet-51" on the Ukrainian light MLRS Sivalka VM-5 in the Kursk region of Russia has been published. The Sivalka VM-5 MLRS is designed to support infantry during offensive operations and is equipped with 12-16 80 mm unguided S-8 aircraft rockets. Initially, the Sivalka VM-5 MLRS was created for special forces of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine. The firing range of the Sivalka VM-5 MLRS is up to 5 km, it can be installed on any chassis, but is usually placed on pickups.
As a result of the strike by the Lancet drone, the Sivalka VM-5 MLRS was damaged, and personnel were also injured.

 
.
I think Trump will end the war. This sums it up below.
@IlyaTERA 1 month ago
And for 2 years the media has been saying that Ukraine is winning 😂😂😂

@haveaniceday6983 2 weeks ago
Have they lost

@IlyaTERA 2 weeks ago
Yes, they have lost an area of land the size of Portugal that they will NEVER get back. And that land was Russia's goal since the beginning, anyone that thinks Russia's goal was to "conquer" all of Ukraine is clueless.
 
.
Lately democrat admin allowed Ukraine to hit Russia with Usa equipment like atacms. They already use drones and similar systems of their own it wont make much difference in Kursk for example.

However if Usa-democrats give longer range lrasm cruise missiles to Ukraine and tell them to hit Moscow then it would be a very big escalation. As mentioned previously in the thread if Russia uses tactical nukes it will open a new chapter in other conflicts worldwide where tactical nukes will be available for them as well. Also Russian army mostly concentrated in SMO zone will be hit from Ukraine airspace by any third party like a massive cruise missile attack like for example missiles launched from sea or a neighbor country and Ukraine can claim responsibility for the attack. In return a large scale Russian nuclear attack can happen to Ukraine to stop the cruise missile attacks but as a result Russian army will be highly damaged from the attack.

Russian allies who have sufficient air defense like Iran and China can install short range air defense line south of Moscow. That would protect Moscow and Saint Petersburg. In return Russia can agree on lowering any conventional reaction against Kiev, Lviv regions outside of Smo zone and use large scale bombs like fabs-odabs defensively like in Kursk for example and use them much less in Smo zone. These kinds of moves can deescalate the conflict for both sides. The point should be the move should also deescalate Russian moves against Ukraine at the same time increasing protection of Russia against these types of attacks.

Also if they put Russia in a difficult situation when trump comes next month or so then trump can make a deal with Russia against Iran or even China maybe. Defensive moves like above will block any trump deal with Russia to stop conflict with Ukraine and in return get concessions from Russia against Iran.

Otherwise since usa is powerful you can trust democrats and believe in whatever they say for a month or two and hope trump will not make a deal to end conflict with Russia and in return get concessions against Iran or China. That is foolish and lack of thinking in my opinion.
 
.
The escalation of the Ukraine war risks bringing the world closer to a nuclear confrontation. Reports indicate that the U.S., France, and the U.K. have authorized Ukraine to strike deep into Russian territory using advanced missiles like SCALP/Storm Shadow. Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that such attacks could trigger a nuclear response and labeled these supplier nations as direct participants in the conflict. This heightened rhetoric and military support are fueling fears of significant escalation amidst ongoing geopolitical instability.


1731914605195.jpeg
1731914611705.jpeg
 
.
Lately democrat admin allowed Ukraine to hit Russia with Usa equipment like atacms. They already use drones and similar systems of their own it wont make much difference in Kursk for example.

However if Usa-democrats give longer range lrasm cruise missiles to Ukraine and tell them to hit Moscow then it would be a very big escalation. As mentioned previously in the thread if Russia uses tactical nukes it will open a new chapter in other conflicts worldwide where tactical nukes will be available for them as well. Also Russian army mostly concentrated in SMO zone will be hit from Ukraine airspace by any third party like a massive cruise missile attack like for example missiles launched from sea or a neighbor country and Ukraine can claim responsibility for the attack. In return a large scale Russian nuclear attack can happen to Ukraine to stop the cruise missile attacks but as a result Russian army will be highly damaged from the attack.

Russian allies who have sufficient air defense like Iran and China can install short range air defense line south of Moscow. That would protect Moscow and Saint Petersburg. In return Russia can agree on lowering any conventional reaction against Kiev, Lviv regions outside of Smo zone and use large scale bombs like fabs-odabs defensively like in Kursk for example and use them much less in Smo zone. These kinds of moves can deescalate the conflict for both sides. The point should be the move should also deescalate Russian moves against Ukraine at the same time increasing protection of Russia against these types of attacks.

Also if they put Russia in a difficult situation when trump comes next month or so then trump can make a deal with Russia against Iran or even China maybe. Defensive moves like above will block any trump deal with Russia to stop conflict with Ukraine and in return get concessions from Russia against Iran.

Otherwise since usa is powerful you can trust democrats and believe in whatever they say for a month or two and hope trump will not make a deal to end conflict with Russia and in return get concessions against Iran or China. That is foolish and lack of thinking in my opinion.
I don't think Russia will make a deal with USA against Iran because Russia and Iran are allied in Syria.
 
.
In September, Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a warning to Western nations, stating that Russia might use nuclear weapons if its territory faced direct attacks. This declaration came amidst growing tensions over the Ukraine conflict and concerns about potential escalation involving advanced weaponry provided by Western allies to Ukraine. Putin emphasized that Russia’s nuclear doctrine allows for such measures under extreme circumstances, signaling Moscow’s resolve to deter threats to its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

 
.
Back
Top Bottom