Asskicker
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Messages
- 342
- Reaction score
- 0
But then why are you using it ?
To make you more popular...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But then why are you using it ?
We can perfectly read through your point you try to make here.
Denial of Hindi does not make one less Indian. This is not 'One Unit'.
You are avoiding stating the facts about Tamils' dislike for Hindi
This is a fact. The movements against Hindi had been started much before even British rule.
So you cant hide behind snapshots against me
You are avoiding stating the facts about Tamils' dislike for Hindi
This is a fact. The movements against Hindi had been started much before even British rule.
So you cant hide behind snapshots against me
Hindi imposition in Tamil Nadu started in 1937 when the Congress Government of the Madras Presidency under C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji) made Hindi a compulsory subject in schools. (The British were still the rulers of the Indian subcontinent at that time but elected local governments in the Provinces were installed under the British rule. Madras Presidency was a province that included much of present Tamil Nadu and parts of present Andhra Pradesh.) Tamils opposed Hindi imposition immediately and Sir A. D. Panneerselvam and E.V. Ramaswamy (he would later be known as Periyar or "the great one") organized anti-Hindi imposition protests in 1938. Two of the arrested protesters, Thalamuthu and Natarajan, died in prison in January 1939. These were the first deaths relating to anti-Hindi agitations. There would be many more, in much bloodier circumstances due to police and army shootings, in the years to come.
The 1940s, 50s and the first half of the 1960s saw many anti-Hindi imposition protests in the form of public meetings, marches, hunger strikes, demonstrations before schools and Indian government offices, and black flag demonstrations before visiting Indian government ministers. Most of these were organized either by the DK or the DMK, and the general public supported them fully. There were several hundred such protests around Tamil Nadu and several thousand people went to jail. Several hundreds were injured when police used lathi charge (charge with wooden sticks) to disburse peaceful protesters.
Things came to a boil in January-February 1965 and the events showed the pent-up frustration and anger of the Tamil public against Hindi imposition. Unlike most of the previous demonstrations, these were NOT organized by DK, DMK or any other political party. These events started with the strikes organized by Tamil Nadu Students Anti-Hindi Agitation Council on January 25 and 26, 1965. The public at large rose up against Hindi imposition across party lines, caste differences, religious divides and economic-social strata. The mass popular swell of opposition to Hindi imposition scared the Hindian politicians who dominated and controlled the Indian government. The Indian government put down the agitation brutally befitting any ruthless dictator. Indian security forces massed into Tamil Nadu to crush the peaceful, unarmed agitation shot and killed well over a hundred unarmed Tamils (not a single demonstrator was armed during the agitation) in just one week in February. Thousands more were maimed for life and many more wounded. Indian government's actions were so brutal that even the United Nations (UN) took note of the situation and discussed it; this was one of the rare instances of United Nations discussing the internal situation of a country.
Just a while ago you were saying India never existed and all that crap ! WTF man! Make a stand.
Btw - Remember Nanking?
A quote of Churchill defines a country? Is he God?Yes, "India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the equator." Winston Churchill
Until 1947. So I was correct.
Nanking ? but we still have our own country.
Yes, "India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the equator." Winston Churchill
Until 1947. So I was correct.
Nanking or not, we still have our own country.
Check the dates in bold and die.
Quote a japanese dude. Quote your papa.Yes, "India is merely a geographical expression. It is no more a single country than the equator." Winston Churchill
Until 1947. So I was correct.
Nanking ? but we still have our own country.
But Indians make fun of the Chinese :
http://www.defence.pk/forums/china-far-east/276165-30-chinese-cant-speak-mandarin.html
LOL
atleast we do have a national language. and oh BTW we thank the invaders due to whom we got the national language and you got the hurt burn opsss no you got Indian Mughals
You must thanks Chinese that 62 war brought TN to your national folds once again.
Tamil staying or working in other states have no choice but to learn and speak the language of that state out of compulsion.
We are talking about Tamils' dislike for Hindi in their own state.
Even those who can speak prefer to reject it.