I never stated that Jinnah's words were more important but as Pakistan is a nation founded by him, the governing structure should have been set up according to his judgement.
And you forgot to mention the day humans set foot on this planet HUMANS should have been going according to allah's Judgment which has been revealed in Quran? Or how about after (Prophet Mohammed PBUH) Muslims should be fallowing his footsteps and implement his judgment in their lifestyle?
Jinnah was not a flawless man and neither he was send by Allah and he is no one to decide the course of entire muslim population who demanded their own separate LAND! For god Sake PAkistan is not his personal property neither Pakistan should revolve around him!
Jinnah said what he thought, it was a truthful statement to a question that was asked of him.
You are confusing opinion and facts here. Anything said by humans (other then those appointed by allah) is an opinion NOT FACTS. And anything said by allah or his messengers is the FACT!
And no Pakistani has claimed Jinnah to be either flawless or a Saint.
You are certainly making him appear like a saint flawless.
You say as if all Muslims supported him, the Mullahs of India including many of the well known personalities opposed and cursed Pakistan. After all they did rightfully assume that it was not going to be an Islamic state but later they managed to hijack the nation and do just that.
Dude, listen... I dont care much what mullahs said, did, thought about Pakistan etc simply because a muslim cant always represent true Islam.
These Muslims you speak of hailed from various sects and were working for a national identity, not a religious one. After all acquiring a nation is acquiring an identity and you can remain a Muslim even in a country where others are in clear majority.
I think you need to study Islam once again. To any Muslim his/her identity is Islam and when Islam is the majority population it is obligatory to implement the rules law etc of Islam on that Nation.
Yes, I know these Hadiths but they are describing relations between Muslims and are not about nation-states and the role of religion within them.
There are many sects in Islam and many states with Muslim citizens, they all have to be together in spirit and a sense of unity through religion. It is not entirely possible to be united under one state that is being proscribed here.
Remember your point was "islam" is only personal practice? well i proved you wrong..
And oh also read this..
Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those of you in
authority. [TMQ An-Nisa: 59]
Judge between them by that which Allah has revealed and follow not their desires
and beware of them lest they seduce you from some part of that which Allah has
revealed to you. [TMQ Al-Maidah: 49]
Whosoever does not judge by that which Allah has revealed, such are oppressors.
[TMQ Al-Maidah: 45]
But no, by your Lord, they can have no (real) faith until they make you judge in all disputes between them and find in their souls no resistance against your decisions,
but accept them with the fullest submission. [TMQ 4:65]
He also says:
Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those of you in authority. [TMQ An-Nisa: 59]